One of the aspects of modelling I love is how much you can learn about the full size object as part of the process
Thanks all, I learned a lot from this
Richard
Yes, sorry about the title ****-up. I don’t think I can change that – moderators?
In my defence, I got out of hospital this morning following surgery on a hand injury, so I’m a bit groggy
Richard
Here we go:
Advice on the method and scope of
structural inspection of wooden
aircraft during restoration, return to
service after extended storage, during
normal service at annual checks, and
following incidents likely to have
caused structural damage. Details of
standard modifications embodied and
details of inspection panels and drain
eyelets required.
http://www.lightaircraftassociation.co.uk/engineering/TADs/947%20DH82A%20TIGER%20MOTH.pdf
Presumably the Cirrus Moth is following best practice
And I can leave the ugly pimples off
Richard
Aha! that would explain it. They became a requirement following the crash.
So, if I base my model on a date before then I can leave them off
I knew this was the place to ask, thank you
Richard
On Planespotters:

Pimples
Richard
What is confusing me is, these pimples are not on all images of g-elbv.
For instance in this Air Britain picture from 2003:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]257472[/ATTACH]
No pimples on the fin and rudder
Richard
Inspecting what? Are there similar lumps on the lower wing
Richard
For jets, shockwaves in the intake, particularly oblique ones reduce the speed to subsonic by the time it reaches the engine face.
If I remember right, you also get a useful pressure increase as you cross the intake shock wave saving a bit of work for the compressor
It’s a long time since I did any fluid dynamics
Richard
Exactly. So every missed gearchange, plus every time you put the car in reverse produces the christmas tree on the sump plug
Richard
Not really, that would have been debris from the gearbox. Engines don’t shed much metal unless there is a problem
Richard
I’m afraid this was another ‘quick, turn Jeremy Vine off!’ moment.
Richard
Clearly not from an aeroplane, just posted because it is relevant to the thread title
Congreve rockets in 1814:

Le Prieur rockets have already been included – hurrah!
Richard
Neither the P-40 nor the P-47 seem to have those large cut outs in the bottom corners
The B-17 doesn’t seem to have that riveted in plate
Stearman looks promising!:

http://www.hoaircraft.com/Stearman-A75N1.html
Richard
The owner was given to understand it is from a B-17
Is that 450050003 number significant?
Richard
Use (quote=Mark12) if you want to include the name of the original poster.
Wow, that takes me back. That’s how I first started using forums
Richard