dark light

|RLWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 531 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1025958
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Did I hear my gallant Capitain call me?

    It is I, Bluebottle

    http://telegoons.org/Images/Bluebottle_TGUM.jpg

    Richard

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1035619
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Did I hear my gallant Capitain call me?

    It is I, Bluebottle

    http://telegoons.org/Images/Bluebottle_TGUM.jpg

    Richard

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1042970
    |RLWP
    Participant

    No, they were definitely U2, I recognised Bono

    http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/3793/elevationplane2bv6.jpg

    Richard

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1050158
    |RLWP
    Participant

    FSM Spitfire £9k bin..

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/spitfire-full-size-replica-/170785465382?pt=UK_Collectables_Militaria_LE&hash=item27c39b6426

    My wife says that I can’t have that to put up on our roof… 🙁

    Richard

    in reply to: ID on this wheel, please! #1050440
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Yes, looks to me like a Johnson 6 wheel non-corridor third, with 5 compartments. 98 built 1893-95, withdrawn 1931-46…;)

    😮

    Serious Respect!

    Richard

    in reply to: ID on this wheel, please! #1050503
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Wow – Those two coach bodies are extremely interesting… 😮

    The larger of the two bears a resemblance to an LNER bogie type, whilst the smaller (formerly 6-wheeled) one reminds me of a GNSR type, although without a comparable image I cannot be 100% certain.

    What is certain is they are of great interest, and are definitely worthy of preservation!

    Thanks for posting the photos. 🙂

    Thank goodness for that, it isn’t only me!

    I wondered if the older one was LNWR, with the location it is more likely to be GNSR. Still on it’s underframe too

    Richard

    in reply to: Fokker DR.1 Triplane Preservation #1051926
    |RLWP
    Participant

    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a108/Gregvan/Jasta18_FokkerDVII368-18Schultz.jpg

    From The Aerodrome

    The DR.I is in the background of this image of a D.VII in the Agricultural Hall, Islington

    MORE: Here is a better image of 144/17:

    http://www.fokkerdr1.com/Dr1_144-17.jpg

    From a great site for all Triplane fans: http://www.fokkerdr1.com/144_17.htm

    Richard

    in reply to: Fokker DR.1 Triplane Preservation #1051969
    |RLWP
    Participant

    One was of course, and displayed in London during the war. It was destroyed afterwards along with the other exhibits

    Richard

    in reply to: Rocket-Boosted P-51D Mustangs #1052528
    |RLWP
    Participant

    It makes interesting reading 😮

    It does look like it was intended for instantaneous in-flight performance boosts, although there seems to be only one set of flight tests done. Meanwhile…

    Acid fumes nearly killed one pilot

    The jet went off on the ground and wrecked an aircraft (tailwheel deflected gasses into fuselage)

    None of the pilots would fly with more than 50 gallons of fuel in the aeroplane because of instability

    And someone went and ended the war

    All good fun

    Richard

    in reply to: Rocket-Boosted P-51D Mustangs #1052532
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Perhaps, although Aerojet were heavily into the development of JATO equipment, so it stands a good chance of being for take-off

    Perhaps I should read the report

    Richard

    MORE: I don’t think they liked it!

    Testing yielded the following conclusions:

    The jet-assisted P-51D airplanes equipped with acid-aniline rocket motors were not operationally suitable and were not useful for any military purpose.

    The dangers and difficulties inherent in the handling and use of nitric acid were excessive. It was extremely unlikely that it would ever be desirable to use rockets based on the acid-aniline combination in any aircraft applications.

    The drag caused by the external fuel and oxidizer tanks was not large enough to have important effects on the top speed of the airplane.

    The rearward CG shift caused by the rocket motor installation had a very serious and undesirable effect on the stability and handling characteristics of the airplane.

    in reply to: Rocket-Boosted P-51D Mustangs #1052538
    |RLWP
    Participant

    They would be for rapid scramble operations. Clostermann describes similar ops in Tempests in the early days of trying to intercept ME-262s, although not rocket assisted! Basically, it was to get off the ground and up to height before the 262s were long gone

    I wonder how long the tail wheel lasted?

    Richard

    in reply to: ID on this wheel, please! #1054396
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Would you be kind enough to take a picture of the railway carriage in the top right of your first picture too please?

    Richard

    in reply to: Heads-up. Hooton Park on Heritage Heroes. #1061661
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Thanks Pully

    Richard

    in reply to: Heads-up. Hooton Park on Heritage Heroes. #1061842
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Still sounds like heads need banging!!!! Would it be worth inviting the offenders to view the forum. Every story has 2 sides and just maybe if they are oblivious of their actions then something positive may come out of it.

    Perhaps the local paper might find some interest in a Hooton mafia story?

    Thanks for saying that, I was trying to decide whether to respond or just forget about it

    As far as I know there is no mechanism for the public to manage the public’s money directly. There are just too many of us. The accepted way is to have an identified group that receives and manages funds – which is what is in place.

    Now, if there are disagreements between various groups, the solution is invariably discussion

    Again, from the outside, it looks like spats between groups with differing aims, and I’m only getting one side of the story. Bottom line for me – if I happened to be local to this project, would I want to get involved? No bloody way

    Richard

    in reply to: Heads-up. Hooton Park on Heritage Heroes. #1062516
    |RLWP
    Participant

    As a totally ignorant outside observer, I can’t see where you are going with this. It looks like one group owns the place and has fallen out with another group, resulting in civil war and attempts to recruit people to one side or the other

    Is the future of the hangars really going to be decided by argument?

    As I say, I know nothing about the place, beyond seeing the building s on TV last night

    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 531 total)