dark light

nazca_steve

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 140 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Falklands "What if…?" #1228416
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Fascinating information from all involved and has cleared up a lot of my questions about this incident, even if the jury is still, and potentially always will be, out on what exactly was fired at who.

    I had no idea that B-108 was potentially severed in two by the Sea Dart, in fact I’m curious to know where that info came from. My guess is that it might have broken up after Pastran ejected, or broke up on impact. I wonder then, did the Royal Navy find some wreckage from it? Is it also possible (bear with me here, total civvie question) that radio transmissions could have been interecepted? I ask this because Pastran was captured shortly afterwards, and I wonder if the RN knew he had ejected? Sharkey Ward talks about the ‘muerta negra’ transmissions in his book, so perhaps RN personnel heard that Pastran was ejecting…

    in reply to: Falklands "What if…?" #1232991
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Very interesting, esp. the range of 32nm when the Canberra was hit. That is a lot further than I thought. Griffiths, from what I have read, the Argentine radar control at Stanley also thought a Mirage had been downed, it was not until a bit later that repeated attempts to contact ‘BACO 2’ failed and they realised B-108 was down.

    What is also interesting is this talk of the Mirage escort having to avoid these multiple SAMS. I’d be curious to know whether this was inbound to the target or outbound. From what I read, the Cans were lit up after the bombed and turned for home, and then hit very shortly after this turn. Not being a Sea Dart expert and knowing the speed of travel for 32nm, one would think this implied they had been lit up prior to this turn and fired on before. Maybe Griffiths can confirm his thoughts on this. Also the sad irony that the very escorts sent to protect them were responsible in way for the detection of the whole flight.

    Either way, it just shows what a tough old girl the Canberra was to take that Sea Dart hit right near the No.1 fuel tank and not just outrightly explode. Very brave of Captain Pastran to buy as much time as possible for Capt. Casado to eject, which sadly was not to be.

    B-109, the other Canberra in ‘BACO flight’ claims it had a hell of ride home and had to avoid AAA and more SAMs, using their countermeasures. This certainly doesn’t tally with the single Sea Dart launch that night, but then who’s to say what one might mistake in such circumstances.

    Jualbo, thanks for the info as well. I heard that the 2 Para man had damaged ear drums, or possibly that was from an earlier raid in May. Graham Colbeck in ‘3 Para to the Falklands’ remembers the sound and concussion from one of the night bombing raids prior to Mt. Longdon. I wonder if this Eagle Base attack is the same incident? My records also show a telephone exchange was damaged in one raid – need to check the date on that.

    in reply to: Falklands "What if…?" #1235402
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Hola Enrique,

    that would be fantastic and is very kind of you to arrange. I saw some earlier photos in this thread of bombed-up C-130s – quite unique to me, I have to say, as before I had only heard stories involving ‘bombs being pushed out the back’ rather than actually on pylons.

    in reply to: Falklands "What if…?" #1235555
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    No apologies necessary, your English translation is excellent and my Spanish is non-existent! ๐Ÿ™‚

    I still think there is a real possibility that the wingtip (the right one) touched the sea.

    Three Canberras flying in V-formation; would they all turn the same way to change course at low level? Probably.

    I would expect a great deal of fragmentary damage from the warhead of a missile that exploded close enough to bend part of a wingtip. Is it really steel or aluminium alloy? Also there is no mention of a flash, fireball, sound or blast, just that an impact was โ€˜feltโ€™ by the pilot.

    It is still a great mystery.

    Just came across this thread while trying to research more on Argentine Canberra ops in the conflict – very interesting discussion and nice to see contributions from both sides of the Atlantic. I think it is suffice to say this was a remarkably audacious mission, to attack the fleet in broad daylight with no ECM to speak of and no escort, and using visual bombing methods at low level. Since this is a ‘what if’ topic, my mind boggles at what if they had made into a bomb-run? My guess is something like what the second group experienced and all hell would have broken loose.

    Another ‘what if’ concerns the mission to bomb the fleet retaking South Georgia prior to the 1st May. Another well-planned and audacious mission, using a Boeing 707 for comms relay and nav aid most of the way down there the mainland. What if the weather had been clear enough to bomb? Would they potentially had more success than the Task Force groups on the 1st? My guess is possibly, but from what I have read, the approach to the ships in the harbour would have been very tricky to bomb from. One can also speculate how much accuracy would have been increased had the Canberras been successfully fitted with their ‘Pelicano’ radars. They would have certainly helped on their later night-bombing raids. From what I understand, B-101 was the only Canberra to fly with it fitted, but I don’t believe it was active. Need to find out more on that…

    Anyway, cracking thread, and I agree with some of the sentiments echoed regarding the tragedy of these two nations fighting when prior to this we had an excellent relationship, especially between our navies. I’m Anglo-Argentine myself, and when we visited there in ’84 and ’86 there was absolutely no animosity that I remember. In fact more of a curiosity, right down to the member of their 601(?) commando group who shot down Geoff Glover with the Blowpipe whom we befriended.

    in reply to: RAF jet kills #1161030
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    However, at least one FAA Wyvern was shot down by a Soviet flown MIG-15, but that’s about it from what I can tell.

    .

    That’s interesting Firebird, I just finished reading ‘Wings Over Suez’ and it made no mention of any Wyverns shot down by a MiG, only some by flak. The overriding theme of that conflict was the MiGs were ordered not to mix it up, and were only fleetingly seen, and often mistaken for French F/RF-84s which were similar in shape. This was much to the frustration of some pilots, but also to the relief of many others, such as Venom and Sea Hawk jocks who were accutely aware of the shortcomings of their birds vs. the newer Soviet stuff. I have wondered though what would have happened should say some of their Furys or Meteor F8s mixed it with the straight-winged FAA birds.

    In a way I should think the Hunter pilots defending our bases during the crisis were a little put out they didn’t get to fly offensive ops over Egypt. I heard there were some close calls though on intercepts, with them nearly shooting down incoming French or Transport Command stuff. What would have been EVEN more interesting were the US/UK encounters. Some close calls from what I read when tensions got high. I can’t believe the gall of the US Sixth fleet sometimes in getting in the way like that.

    Fascinating thread this.

    in reply to: Les Bywaters #1161744
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    This is sad news… I met Les on many occasions at the Midland Air Museum, and had the utmost respect for his Canberra knowledge….

    Blue Skies Les, you will be missed

    Very, very sad. I just saw this now. Like Hunterfx, I met Les at the MAM once as well, following almost a year of e-mail correspondence in which he kindly filled me in a lot of Canberra ins and outs, as well as some cracking cold-war stories from his RAF years. He also ‘proofed’ my early Canberra repaints for FS2004 very thoroughly and I thank him for that. Top, top bloke and I will miss him a lot.

    I do wonder what will happen to his superb web site, as it is too good to let fall by the wayside. I shall pay my respects to him from this side of the Atlantic and will miss his posts on all the forums. Definitely the authority on the Cranberry. Rest in peace, Les.

    Steve

    in reply to: Some new pics of Indian Air Force aircraft in the 60's #1165929
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Nice 2 (?) Sqn GAF Canberra in the top pic as well. I love that old Aussie white and silver colour scheme.

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1166943
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Incidentally and completely off topic – but our “Blue Bomber” T4 WJ874 on 39 Sqn was due to go all goth and get adorned in blackness after her 50th Anniversary tour in the now famous Petter Blue representation scheme..as it turned out the blue proved so popular we never went ahead with it (amongst other reasons)..Always wondered how she would’ve looked in gloss black..

    Okay sorry, back on with the topic in hand! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    Interesting, I had no idea, Tim. I like the Petter blue a lot myself, even if the shade they did WJ874 in is not quite azure enough but more turquoise/PRU blue. The tone they did the T.4 in for the 40th anniv. at Wyton was closer, but was matt rather than gloss, so not quite accurate either. For an all-black, glossy Canberra, think VX185, or better yet, English Electric’s old chase Canberra, G-ATZW. There is a colour pic on Air Britain I think of the latter, and I did a repaint of it too. Lovely bird really, but I do prefer a ripple myself!

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1169871
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    I agree that we are definitely closest with that XF375 shot, Tony. I will wait a bit longer though on the off chance we find out for sure. If not it’ll be guesswork based off what we have here. I’m sure she’ll still look fetching in red and grey.

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1170487
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Thanks to Bill, Chox, Tony and everyone else for shedding more light on this mystery. It looks the case is still somewhat open though until we get a clearer idea of the full colour scheme. The Hunter photo helps, but I feel I still can’t accurately paint this one up yet. There’s got to be some old ETPS photos showing WV910 lying around in personal collections…

    Seems like 910 had an interesting service life nonetheless, even if she didn’t make the conversion upgrade to FGA.6 like many sister FGA.4s (isn’t WV797 at the MAM another upgrade conversion?) As for her ground instruction work, UK Serials states 910 was w/o in ’58 to the ETPS as a GIA, and Rocketeer himself used for those purposes. Great to hear that, by the way. It is interesting that she flew between ’53-59, so she must have worn some kind of ETPS colours prior to the ‘chop colours’ as has been theorised. These may well have been different to what we see on the current nose cone, as Chox suggests. The plot thickens…

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1171797
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Nice one, Chox, that’s helpful. I’m going to try and find some shots with those schemes, but if you or anyone else has some, please share.

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1171853
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Thanks anyway XM692. This looks as if it might be a hard one to come up with anything. I have submitted my request to the BD collection newsletter, so that might net something too.

    It is curious that the scheme seems to show red and grey, rather than red and white and (blue) if this was a typical raspberry ripple scheme. It almost looks more like the 70s era red and grey trainer colours that you saw some Canberras in.

    in reply to: canberra prototype? #1171934
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    If anybody goes looking for the scrap remains of VN799, good luck and let me know how it goes. What would be equally interesting would be to find the remains of the other sister prototypes, especially my old fave, VN813, which was later used as the De Havilland Spectre rocket testbed. I have no idea what happened to these other B.1s, but would love to know.

    There is something classic to me about the B.1. It really was too bad that the radar bombing equipment never materialised in time to fit the B.1 and make it what it was supposed to be. Results might have been more accurate in the Suez crisis for example. As much as I love the glazed nose types, there is something sleek and attractive about the smooth nose B.1 (and T.4 I suppose).

    Maybe Les B will confirm about VX185, but I would guess that is among the oldest, since this was an early PR.3 prior to her conversions. I wonder if the MAM’s PR.3, WF922 is also a contender…?

    in reply to: Seeking info on Airwork Services #1171946
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Does anybody have any info on specific work performed by Airwork Sea Hawks? You’ve probably all seen the photos of them in their all-black livery. Given that some were fitted with Harley lights, I think the FRU used them for gunnery practice, but I wondered if a) anyone on here flew them or b) knew some more details.

    ATB,

    Steve

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Hawk WV910 (ETPS machine) – photos? #1171980
    nazca_steve
    Participant

    Hello again,

    well, I managed to get a couple of snaps of WV910 from the Boscombe Down Collection themselves, but no other info is known about this particular airframe. As I saw there was another recent thread about Sea Hawk noses, I thought I’d bait the waters again in the hope that someone out there knows something about this old girl.

    http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a218/nazca_steve/seahawk/WV9101-1.jpg

    http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a218/nazca_steve/seahawk/WV9103.jpg

    The plan is to paint up WV910 for the model I made recently for FS2004, such as this rather folorn WV798 static scenery model:

    http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a218/nazca_steve/seahawk/wv798_021-1.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 140 total)