dark light

Bluewings

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 973 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2357408
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Spudman :

    When the 9X Blk2 becomes integrated, it will not have to hang out in the airstream at all before launch.

    Spud , you ‘re confusing multiple things here .
    You are talking about LOAL (Lock On After Launch) when we talk LOBL (Before Launch) .
    Firing LOAL during dogfight is outrageously counter productive ! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    If the target is turning hard (dogfight) , your 9X will go straight with nothing to lock on anymore .
    Think …
    What is useful is LOBL . When you press the trigger , the missile is already locked onto the target .
    This is barely possible with the F-22 .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2357414
    Bluewings
    Participant

    bloodshot :

    I wonder how many Viper pilots would agree with that statement ?
    Not to many I’m guessing !

    Yes , I exaggerated , I admit ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    I enjoyed your post and I like your tone . ๐Ÿ™‚

    The APG-77(V)2 is said to have some degree of in-band jamming capability which could be useful against x-band missile seekers. Although its also been stated that the current generation of MMIC modules which it shares with the APG-80 and APG-81 are limited by the duration that they can be used in this manner before damage.

    Exactly .
    This is what I was talking about earlier on and I believe that some US fanboys should think twice about it :
    The F-22 DOESN’T have any ECMs .
    For a 5th gen aircraft , it ‘s a big miss . When you add no IRST , no LRF , no LWR , no TV Cam … ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    They can bash our nice 4.5 gen aircraft(s) but they should think twice first . :diablo:

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357424
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Taygibay , thank you for … everything ๐Ÿ™‚
    lol !;)

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357434
    Bluewings
    Participant

    uss novice , we can provide even more materials but YOU have to do your homework TOO ๐Ÿ˜‰

    But this does not suggest that the Rafale can fire a mica at bvr using the info from the OSF – unless of course the LRF is used

    Correct .

    The OSF allows detection/tracking of heat sigs and forms a great image of targets well beyond VR, but is the track good enough for a firing solution. Range AND bearing?

    The OSF without the LRF can ‘t do ranging .

    OR does it use the RBE or LRF to be able to fire a BVR missile?

    It can use both , radar at long range , radar and LRF at 35-40km .

    This does not truly make the Rafale any different from its peers – almost any modern a/c with IRST/TV can do the same including the PIRATE and OLS-30.

    IRST/TV is not good enough , you don ‘t get any ranging which is something you need BVR to get a good pk (Probability of Kill) . A LRF is needed .

    Now , the Rafale is not the only fighter to have a good IRST and a good LRF but it is the only one to have a long range TV Cam . In itself , it is a huge advantage regarding situational awareness especially when you know how hard the RoE (Rules Of Engagement) actually are .
    Nowadays , you need to know who you are firing at and being able to visually look at your target at up to 50km is giving you the opportunity AND the “right” to fire earlier than anybody else .

    As an example , a SU-35 , or SH , a Typhoon , a F-22 , etc will check the IFF (when it works) or ask to an AWAC for infos on the “possible target” when a Rafale will look at the target and … fire .
    This is what happened 2 years ago during the European “Tiger Meet” joint exercise where the Rafales were able to fire first in most situations , including against “enemy” ships .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357441
    Bluewings
    Participant

    uss novice :

    Is this applicable for fast moving fighters as well?

    Yes of course . From the same link :

    Offering unique high sensitivity detection and multiple threat capability, and operating smart data fusion between multi-spectral sensors, it provides identification, location, jamming and decoying against an extensive range of electromagnetic, infra-red and laser threats.

    If I remember well , since its latest upgrade , SPECTRA works from 80 MHz to 40 GHz . It covers the following radio bands : VHF , UHF , L , S , C , X , Ku , K , Ka .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357456
    Bluewings
    Participant

    uss novice :

    Any sources on this would be appreciated.

    Thanks to TMor ‘s work on putting everything together in a nice and friendly way , here are your answers :

    The OSF is used for mainly for air-to-air (this is why it is above the nose), but also air-to-ground and air-to-sea detection. It is made of :

    * an infrared sensor (IRST), dual band (3-5ยตm and 8-12ยตm) so as to detect even stealth targets by day and night, at more than 100km, with an angular multi-target tracking capability. Of course, it is not prone to EM jamming, and does not suffer from maneuvers like “beam” ;
    * a TV camera associated with a laser range-finder. The camera allows the pilot(s) to : identify a target at long range (up to 50km depending on the size), check its weapons (the pilot will then tell Spectra about it), assess battle damage, count the aircraft in a close formation, all of this at long range, well before visual range. The camera automatically points the most threatening target. The laser range-finder also allows for a stealthy firing solution provided the target has no laser detector (a lot of fighter aren’t equipped yet). But its range is limited to 30 to 40 km, depends on the LCS (Laser Cross Section : is the target big ?) and can’t cope with fogs and clouds.

    The OSF can also work as a FLIR, but its position above the nose compromises it.

    All these data come from Dassault various publications like the FoxThree “journal de bord” :
    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/fr/defense/rafale/publications.html

    Also check the No14 (under “Nowhere to hide , passive detection”) :
    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/fileadmin/user_upload/redacteur/Defence/Rafale/Fox_Three_N_14_UK2.pdf

    Cheers .

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2357613
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Jessmo :

    Like I mentioned before, even with with no stealth the F-22 is superior because of its energy advantage.

    Nope . Energy advantage is only one part of the equation .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357617
    Bluewings
    Participant

    uss novice :

    So, no ranging just based on Spectra/OSF – TV ? ………………. that it could fire Mica IIR based purely on the emitter location system via the spectra.

    Sir , you said “without radio emission” , so SPECTRA can ‘t be used in this case .
    If there are some emission like radar scan , SPECTRA can indeed targets the foe BVR .
    So :
    -a) no radio emission : BVR firing with IR Micas + LRF (35km)
    -b) radio emission : BVR firing at long range with SPECTRA

    Do I make sense ?

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357628
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Taygibay :

    Is that good for you?

    Yep ๐Ÿ˜‰
    As I said elsewhere , the actual SPECTRA is even more advanced than the article is saying since it has reached its latest tranche .
    The next F5 tranche is already founded and will be fully digital and use the latest MMICs and probably better AESA antennas as well .
    Without being “cocky” , I personally believe that the French have a nice little lead in ECMs .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357638
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Well Taygibay, there is nothing to be confused about ๐Ÿ˜‰

    The Mica ‘s IR seekers don ‘t need “triangulation” , when they see something , they go after it .
    Regarding the acquisition range , it is classified but we know that the Magic II was capable to track a target at around 12-15km .
    Since the Mica ‘s IR seeker is more advanced and is said to be used as IRSTs by the pilots , we can guess that its acquisition range is probably around 20km .

    But as I pointed out a while back to those guys, it does not work quite as well once those misiles have been fired

    ???:confused: An IR Mica on its rail or in flight has the same detection range . Why it would be different since the seeker has its own power unit ?

    Cheers .

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2357671
    Bluewings
    Participant

    quadbike :

    The Problem is the Raptor can equal or better the Rafale/Typhoon when it comes to passsive detection and situational awareness with a comprehensive avionics upgrade.

    But neither the Rafale nor the Typhoon can get what the Raptor has in terms of Stealth.

    I agree . It is why the F-22 holds an edge from the start .
    Nevertheless , I strongly doubt that the F-22 fleet will get any meaningful upgrades like LRF and long range optics (visual light and IR) .

    In this regard , the F-35 has more or less all the bells and whistles , at least on paper .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: STRANGE STEALTH JETS – RUSSIAN MIG-144 PLASMA STEALTH #2357699
    Bluewings
    Participant

    The Mig 1.44 has been ditched long ago …

    Then , the plasma technology is nowhere to be ready .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357701
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Taygibay :

    It can do ranging, Bluewings, with its integrated laser.

    I know , re-read my post ๐Ÿ™‚
    I should have said IRST instead of OSF .
    Indeed the LRF is a part of the OSF .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2357713
    Bluewings
    Participant

    uss novice :

    b) Can the Rafale fire missiles in BVR without any radio emissions? I know that it can do so WVR with the use of a LRF, and perhaps a Gripen like triangulation is possible via multiple Rafales. However, can it do this singlehandedly with the combination of sensors that it has (OSF/Spectra) and the Mica IIR?

    Big question .
    Can the OSF do ranging ? Personally , I don ‘t think so . If there is no radio emission coming from the foe , SPECTRA is useless .
    So , at what distance the Mica ‘s IR seekers can track a target in LOBL ? The range is classified .
    At what distance the LRF can be used : 35km in good condition which is BVR .
    So yes , the Rafale (when alone) can fire BVR and btw , a target at 35km or less is within Mica ‘s NEZ (No Escape Zone) .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2357785
    Bluewings
    Participant

    aurcov :

    A draw in DACT doesn’t mean that one of the oponent run out of fuel. It means that the time alocated was up, or one of the oponents came below the allowed altitude.

    The French Rafale pilots said that the F-22 ran out of fuel few times (I already posted the link to Cpt. Romain ‘s blog) .

    BTW, in this thread, you keep mentioning that the F 22 will run out of fuel

    No , I don ‘t say such thing . I don ‘t say “will” run out of fuel , I say it has ran out of fuel . It has been noted by the pilots that the F-22 , when using the AB , is burning fuel at an alarming rate and can ‘t withstand a hard dogfight for a long time .
    We ‘re not talking about cruise at high altitude .

    Who told you this?

    Yes a M2000-9 had a “gun kill” on a F-22 and yes the Rafale is more agile than a M2000 . It ‘s now established facts .

    That’s because most of the fighters (including Rafale) use Link 16 (L-band), while the IFDL of the F 22 are on Ku band.

    Irrelevant . Furthermore , the Ku band (12 to 18 GHz) is more easily detectable that the L band (40 to 60 GHz (NATO), 1 to 2 GHz (IEEE)) , the Ku band is also susceptible to “rain fade” and “snow fade” . Google it to know more . ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    various official sources claim that it is harder to detect with IR sensor

    Maybe but personally I doubt it especially when the F-22 is build to fly high and a good IRST will detect it (against a cold sky) . Then , when you fly at high speed (supercruise) , the airframe gets hotter .
    F-22 seen from the Rafale ‘s OSF (TV) :

    http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/7910/capture1kb.jpg
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/1221/capture2ak.jpg

    an AESA is very difficult to detect by RWR, ESM; that why AESAs were built in the first place; that’s also why the French picked-up the idea and are in proces of introducing an AESA for their Rafale

    Not exactly . The main purpose of having an AESA radar has very little to do with LPI , as explained before . It has more to do with the capability to do multiple things at the same time like “scan here while track there” , scan in AtoA while doing a ground mapping , etc …

    Cheers .

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 973 total)