dark light

Bluewings

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 973 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale News IX #2399406
    Bluewings
    Participant

    jackjack :

    can you do a french google for me please, i have found nothing in english

    That wouldn ‘t help you . The latest Thalรจs infos (in english) :
    http://www.thalesonline.fr/Portfolio/Defence/Aerospace_Product_AESARBE2Radar/?pid=6902

    Cheers .

    in reply to: New Swedish stealth Aircraft concept? #2399450
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Nice design , interesting …

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2399457
    Bluewings
    Participant

    As far as I know jackjack , no .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2399483
    Bluewings
    Participant

    As far as I know , only the APG-81 (F-35) and the F-22 APG-77v1 (v2 version is not fielded yet) are capable of active jamming .

    The APG-77v1 (when used as an active jammer) is only capable of boosting 1000watts for a single minute or it burns . The v2 version is supposed to increase the output power .
    Anyway , we have to remember that only the X band is concerned .

    The AESA RBE2 is said to have about the same capability but I don ‘t know if the Rafale will use it .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399526
    Bluewings
    Participant

    What claims do you want me to prove , jackjack ?

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399541
    Bluewings
    Participant

    I don ‘t know the expression . Could you explain it to me , please .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399870
    Bluewings
    Participant

    I agree , TMor and Toan can be trusted .
    Myself , well … I say what I mean and I do what I say ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Up to you to trust me or not , no worries ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399907
    Bluewings
    Participant

    the rafale reputation is improved by dismissing fanboy sillyness and not giving it oxygen

    That ‘s for sure . ๐Ÿ™‚
    To be honest , I haven ‘t read anything yet coming from a “fanboy” . The few French posters here on this board are knowledgeable and intelligent enough to avoid talking crap .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399911
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Ok , sorry , I did not get it right ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    Thanks . ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Cheer .

    in reply to: Rafale F4 vs. Typhoon (ca. 2014) #2399913
    Bluewings
    Participant

    jackjack :

    [Bwhen BW dismisses the word changing of removable to droppable for the pixie dust rafale [/B]

    Hang on !!
    The probe is NOT dropeable .
    I only pointed out that if it was , it could not be possible to drop it while flying upside down .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399914
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Thank you for your good and enlightening post TEEJ . ๐Ÿ™‚
    *******************

    You are probably thinking of the Mirage 2000 lost over Bosnia during Operation Deliberate Force in 1995?

    Yep , sorry for the memory fart , ooops .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399948
    Bluewings
    Participant

    When I ‘ll see the F-35 doing half of this :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv9MW0o32wc

    I may change my mind , maybe …

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399953
    Bluewings
    Participant

    pfcem , there is one thing you must understand once for all (this is also aimed at other posters) .

    The F-35 is a brick with engine powerful enough to keep it airborne .
    It can ‘t even do a proper roll without loosing altitude .

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june10/defense_04-21.html
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4df9k_f35-lightning-ii_tech

    I can find many other videos showing the same behavior .
    Then , people (like Beesley) are telling me that it can match a F-16 !?? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    They should go easy with the Jack Daniel ‘s No7 :diablo:

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399963
    Bluewings
    Participant

    pfcem :

    It does no such thing.
    What it does state is “to counter potential wing drop in transonic turns” (amazing how they could possibly anticipate a potential issue &/or know before hand how to counter it) & that if said potential issue should manifest that it “can be resolved with flight control software changes”.
    Note that this is only a potential issue for the F-35C & only at transonic speeds, not a concern for the F-35A or F-35B.

    Nice bla-bla-bla and nice try , no offence but you come short . :p
    Tell me again , why do they need a “spoiler” ? :diablo:
    I don ‘t know any other aircraft needing such … device to fly properly at transonic speed …

    Cola :

    Well, coalition forces lost six Tornados indeed, but they busted an airfield

    I am really sorry that the coalition lost six Tornados with their crews , but six aircraft lost for an Iraki airfield is poor and not worth it . We could have shot down the Iraki aircraft in the air for less than that .

    Cheers .

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399993
    Bluewings
    Participant

    Jessmo :

    5 . You come off as desperate.

    Lol ! AHAHAH !!!:D
    You are a funny one , lol ! ๐Ÿ™‚ really !

    Cheers .

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 973 total)