This “project” has been around for a couple of years now. I’m not holding my breath.
Fantastic pics! Herzlichen Dank!
I’m quite sure that only one or two Drakens wore that scheme, and only while they were with Saab, and that they were all delivered to the RDanAf in the familiar green scheme.
You coul also try the forum at ipms.dk, there are a couple of real RDanAF paint scheme specialists there.
This German-Phantom-to-fly-in-the-UK story ranks right up there with the greatest urban myths of all time.
Actually, they aren’t undervalued compared to cars. Classic and vintage cars are valuable because they have verifiable provenance. If you put together a 1750 Alfa, say, from bitsas and fabricated parts, you’d have what the cars guys call a replica.
I’d venture that there is much more demand – and hence higher prices – for vintage cars, because
– anyone can drive a vintage car and walk away from the experience alive without any further training
– you can keep it/them at home, and relatively little space is required
– hardly any red tape involved with operating a car
Cars are just so much more accessible and practical.
Here’s another sacrilegical use of “Spitfire” for an airplane 🙂
Either they use the same volunteers to knock up the next eleven or they hire some guys
Well, yes, that’s one of the issues where the naïvety aspect comes in. I sincerely doubt that this kind of mass production falls within the LAA’s definition of “amateur construction”.
They had a German representative for quite a number of years, and it’s propely certified in the microlight category. Only a couple were built. A German, scaled Bf 109 microlight replica achieved similar numbers.
If that’s their liking, why not? I wouldn’t critisize your plane and what you wear in it.
Just had a look at Enstone’s homepage and the same price is cited there 😮
The entire enthusiastic concept is a nice one, albeit very naïve in many aspects. If done honestly and not causing financial grief or bodily injury to anyone, why not?
Scaled WW2 replicas have however been around for years (WAR, Jurca, Loehle) and none of them are around in any significant numbers. Not even the very cheap and simple Loehle 5151 Mustang. Why should it be any different with this one, and at that price?
Are there any active PPL holders here who, if you won that amount of money in a lottery, would spend it on such a type?
I wonder whether the price was quoted correctly by The Daily Mail, seems rather a lot of money for a kit-built aircraft with an automotive engine? That’s what a little used, 2-seater Extra 330 or a new Decathlon with all options would cost. I know which one I’d choose.
Interesting instrumen fit for a Stearman, cf. the manifold pressure gauge and the airspeed indicator going up to 300 kts/mph 🙂
a Lotus 7 that is a copy but smaller of a Caterham 7, which is far away for the real thing
The Caterham Seven is the legitimate successor to the Lotus Seven, not vice-versa, not a copy, and very much the real thing (I own one).
How can anybody get so worked up about somebody reusing the Spitfire name for a look-alike? Where’s the problem? Potential look-alike owners would never be in the market for the real thing and vice-versa, they are worlds apart in all dimensional, financial and performance parameters, and the marketing of the look-alike does not harm that of the real thing.
Different thing for the Seven. The original Seven is still being built, and the various look-alikes can come very close in looks, performance and price, hence those who try profit form somebody else’s name to the latter’s detriment.
Another possibility would be to contact the Luftfahrtbundesamt in Germany:
https://www.lba.de/DE/TopService/Kontakt/kontakt_node.html
You’d have to argue why you need the information (data protection laws) and pay for it as well though:
http://www.lba.de/DE/Technik/Verkehrszulassung/Hinweise/Auskuenfte.html
Fantastic, something else for a change! Interesting to see that the Boredom Fighters are registered in the microlight category!