dark light

Kenneth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 843 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B-377 Stratocruiser – Project #879962
    Kenneth
    Participant

    This “project” has been around for a couple of years now. I’m not holding my breath.

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #852071
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Fantastic pics! Herzlichen Dank!

    in reply to: Danish Silver Draken #853082
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I’m quite sure that only one or two Drakens wore that scheme, and only while they were with Saab, and that they were all delivered to the RDanAf in the familiar green scheme.

    You coul also try the forum at ipms.dk, there are a couple of real RDanAF paint scheme specialists there.

    in reply to: F4F Phantom 38+48? to UK #859053
    Kenneth
    Participant

    This German-Phantom-to-fly-in-the-UK story ranks right up there with the greatest urban myths of all time.

    in reply to: Asking $2.5 for a Spit. A record ? #873922
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Actually, they aren’t undervalued compared to cars. Classic and vintage cars are valuable because they have verifiable provenance. If you put together a 1750 Alfa, say, from bitsas and fabricated parts, you’d have what the cars guys call a replica.

    I’d venture that there is much more demand – and hence higher prices – for vintage cars, because

    – anyone can drive a vintage car and walk away from the experience alive without any further training
    – you can keep it/them at home, and relatively little space is required
    – hardly any red tape involved with operating a car

    Cars are just so much more accessible and practical.

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869419
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Here’s another sacrilegical use of “Spitfire” for an airplane 🙂

    http://www.loehle.com/loehle-aircraft-kits/spitfire/

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869797
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Either they use the same volunteers to knock up the next eleven or they hire some guys

    Well, yes, that’s one of the issues where the naïvety aspect comes in. I sincerely doubt that this kind of mass production falls within the LAA’s definition of “amateur construction”.

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869800
    Kenneth
    Participant

    They had a German representative for quite a number of years, and it’s propely certified in the microlight category. Only a couple were built. A German, scaled Bf 109 microlight replica achieved similar numbers.

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869810
    Kenneth
    Participant

    If that’s their liking, why not? I wouldn’t critisize your plane and what you wear in it.

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869822
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Just had a look at Enstone’s homepage and the same price is cited there 😮

    The entire enthusiastic concept is a nice one, albeit very naïve in many aspects. If done honestly and not causing financial grief or bodily injury to anyone, why not?

    Scaled WW2 replicas have however been around for years (WAR, Jurca, Loehle) and none of them are around in any significant numbers. Not even the very cheap and simple Loehle 5151 Mustang. Why should it be any different with this one, and at that price?

    Are there any active PPL holders here who, if you won that amount of money in a lottery, would spend it on such a type?

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #869955
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I wonder whether the price was quoted correctly by The Daily Mail, seems rather a lot of money for a kit-built aircraft with an automotive engine? That’s what a little used, 2-seater Extra 330 or a new Decathlon with all options would cost. I know which one I’d choose.

    in reply to: Derelict Stearman at RFV Rendcomb? #870171
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Interesting instrumen fit for a Stearman, cf. the manifold pressure gauge and the airspeed indicator going up to 300 kts/mph 🙂

    in reply to: New UK Spitfire Restoration Company? #870319
    Kenneth
    Participant

    a Lotus 7 that is a copy but smaller of a Caterham 7, which is far away for the real thing

    The Caterham Seven is the legitimate successor to the Lotus Seven, not vice-versa, not a copy, and very much the real thing (I own one).

    How can anybody get so worked up about somebody reusing the Spitfire name for a look-alike? Where’s the problem? Potential look-alike owners would never be in the market for the real thing and vice-versa, they are worlds apart in all dimensional, financial and performance parameters, and the marketing of the look-alike does not harm that of the real thing.

    Different thing for the Seven. The original Seven is still being built, and the various look-alikes can come very close in looks, performance and price, hence those who try profit form somebody else’s name to the latter’s detriment.

    in reply to: Stinson L-5 Sentinel #873973
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Another possibility would be to contact the Luftfahrtbundesamt in Germany:

    https://www.lba.de/DE/TopService/Kontakt/kontakt_node.html

    You’d have to argue why you need the information (data protection laws) and pay for it as well though:

    http://www.lba.de/DE/Technik/Verkehrszulassung/Hinweise/Auskuenfte.html

    in reply to: Italian Historical FlyParty 2014 #460004
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Fantastic, something else for a change! Interesting to see that the Boredom Fighters are registered in the microlight category!

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 843 total)