dark light

Kenneth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 843 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mosquito – Canadian Press Report #1288363
    Kenneth
    Participant

    The fuss in Canada about this Mosquito is almost identical to the uproar in Sweden recently when 2 1/2 Fireflies left the country in short succession (1 1/2 to DX, one to Denmark):

    Everyone had known about these aircraft for years and years, and yet nobody actively did anything with them. Then plans for their disposal emerge and everyone starts weeping.

    Sorry, I find it pathetic.

    PS! What kind of fire protection systems exist in the building where the Mosquito is presently stored…?

    PPS! Have I missed something or has nobody yet ventured a guess about the potential buyer in the UK?

    in reply to: Vickers/Triumph Plane/Car name swap #1257971
    Kenneth
    Participant

    No, but I wonder what impact it would have had on marketing if they had chosen Vildebeest or Wellesley.. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Up she goes ! (Fuel price ) #434126
    Kenneth
    Participant

    The hourly rate for the Remos G3/600 I rent here in Germany has increased from โ‚ฌ 90,- to โ‚ฌ 103,- per hour (wet) in less than 24 months. And that’s at a consumption of approx. 15 l (MOGAS) per hour…..

    in reply to: G-CVIX Sea Vixen Status (merged) #1259105
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Please be very careful when speculating, as it can cause untold harm to the organisation you are speculating about.

    With all due respect:

    Is this only applicable to the Sea Vixen, or does it apply to other subjects in this forum as well? If yes, where are you going to draw the line, on which subjects are we then allowed to speculate and would it then not just be most efficient to shut down the forum to avoid the damage you fear?

    There is a distinct difference between (a) people directly or indirectly associated with an organisation leaking more or less correct snippets of information, and (b) a happy bunch of enthusiasts speculating by firing off more or less correct guesses.

    Postings from people in category (a) indeed need to made while exercising utmost care.

    This nothwithstanding, I honestly find it very hard to believe that serious potential financial supporters of an organisation cannot distinguish between these categories in a public (!) forum with essentially unlimited access (!), and/or get put off from postings by people in category (b).

    @G-NATY (again with all due respect):

    This thread has been running for about a fortnight before you tagged on to it! I should think you would have look here quite often, given the importance you attribute to this forum?

    I can only echo the previously expressed opinions to the effect that information directly from the horse’s mouth would go a long way to avoid the situation that you so dislike.

    in reply to: Me 109 red 7 update #1264834
    Kenneth
    Participant

    EADS is the parent company/owners of the Messerschmitt Foundation

    No, they’re not, they are two separate entities.

    Unless I’m wrong, EADS has something to do with the Messerschmitt Foundation – D-FMBB and D-FEHD both bear the EADS logo beneath their cockpits.

    The G-6, G-10, Bf 108 and the Me 262 and M17 replicas are owned by the Messerschmitt Foundation, but are operated by EADS. The three former aircraft used two be owned by DASA as they were then, but as the company was going through some rough times in the mid-nineties, they were acquired by the Messerschmitt-Foundation.

    Whoever owns Rote 7 is however not quite clear at the moment.

    And, as I have probably pointed out umpteen times in this forum, the G-10 is registered D-FDME, it was D-FEHD until it was converted to full G-10 status with a DB engine….

    in reply to: Aircraft names and places (Merged with a zombie) #1264849
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Close to where I live in Munich, there’s Piperstrasse (but I am pretty sure that any relation to the aircraft manufacturer is purely coincidental), and in the Munich suburb of Neubiberg there’s Willy-Messerschmitt-Strasse.

    in reply to: What happened to the French Halifaxes? #1287362
    Kenneth
    Participant

    And what happened to those French Privateers? Also broken up without trace?

    While you’re at it you can add a lot of other types in French post-WW2 service which seem to have disappeared essentially without a trace, such as Hellcats, Helldivers, M-S Vanneau etc.

    Seems that aircraft preservation was not so big in France in those days as it is now?

    in reply to: French B-17 Pink Lady to be "grounded for good"!!! #1287368
    Kenneth
    Participant

    My previous post on this subject notwithstanding (I’m not a big fan of the insurance business and had to get that off my chest…), I do seem to recall reading somewhere (when Sally-B had insurance problems) that the situation was different with Pink Alice as was insured under a contract covering all of the Salis Collection aircraft, and that therefore no increase in fees was levied :confused:

    in reply to: Car safety seat might have helped save 3 year old #434266
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Seatbelts in light aircraft can be shocking in terms of provision and fixing. I wonder how many have succumb to a collision with the panel?

    Hear, hear!

    When I flew a C172 (built in ยด86) I always felt that the shoulder strap would cause severe neck and (possibly) throat injuries in a crash. One of our club instructors routinely never put it on, citing these grounds. The ridiculous seatbelts in the standard club aircraft was one of the grounds which me made convert to microlights. The ’06Remos G3/600 I fly now has a four-point harness from the automotive racing industry which positively nails you to the seat.

    in reply to: French B-17 Pink Lady to be "grounded for good"!!! #1294561
    Kenneth
    Participant

    As always, when this subject crops up, one very important detail is always forgotten:

    There is nothing which would prevent an insurance company from keeping the insurance fees at the level they were at before the required insurance sums were raised!!!

    So if all insurance companies decide to impose the same price hike on the operator of a low-risk vintage aircraft as on an airliner, “Pink Alice’s” grounding is just as much to blame on the ever-greedy insurers as on any legislative bodies!!

    in reply to: dornier pfiel 335 #1303434
    Kenneth
    Participant

    It was – see the Cessna 336 and 337 series…

    … and the new Adam Aircraft A500 ๐Ÿ˜‰

    I don’t think the concept is without its problems though. Apart from cooling of the rear engine, the turbulent flow arriving at the rear propeller would seem to cause excessive noise (as confirmed by the C336/C337…) and you’d need an imaginative airframe/undercarriage layout to avoid a propstrike at the rear end.

    in reply to: Heinkel He177 Greif #1318606
    Kenneth
    Participant

    [QUOTE][Greif is a griffen or griffon. There is a species of vulture called a griffon vulture but that is not the same a griffon. My dictionary tells me that the German for vulture is aasgeier.
    /QUOTE]

    You’re both correct, sorreee… ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Heinkel He177 Greif #1319143
    Kenneth
    Participant

    As regards the title, althought the He 177 probably brought “grief” to many, it’s real name is actually “Greif” (which is a vulture in German”). Sorry for nitpicking…

    in reply to: Hello and a quick question #1320312
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Apparently she is away for a ‘sympathetic restoration’

    Does that mean Swedish colours again ? (* duck *)

    in reply to: Hello and a quick question #1320586
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Susie has been exported to Germany…

    … and recently arrived in Freiburg in southwest Germany.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 843 total)