An Aquila A210 registered D-EAIZ belonging to Airbus HFB Motorfluggruppe had taken off from Hamburg-Finkenwerder on 24.03.06 at about noon. It was found several hours later on a remote field in Rantzau (Plön) by forest workers. Both occupants, Gunnar T. (aged 38) and Daniel M. (aged) were killed in the crash.
Source:
Compilation of news reports here: http://www.flugzeugforum.de/forum/showthread.php?t=31260 (in German)
That’s Munich allright; the two aircraft in the top of the picture are right on top of Landshuter Allée which is a part of my daily commute to work…..
Has happened to me too:
A large European GA magazine used a photograph of mine lifted off the Internet without asking, but coughed up what I wanted after I sent them a letter reminding them about copyright and so on.
A US manufacturer of decals for model aircraft uses a photograph of mine (also lifted off the internet without permission) of a jet fighter in a little-seen special c/s aircraft on the packaging/instruction sheet of a decal set for that aircraft.
Two cases in less than a year and I haven’t got my own website and haven’t put that many photos on the internet. Makes you think.
And if you look in the forum in airliners.net you will see dozens of other similar cases….
can you get inside the Connie?
The Connie and the CASA are both open to the public, the DC-3 isn’t.
Quite “atmospheric” in the snow.
Depends on how you look at it. Another 2 feet of snow (not kidding!) were added until Sunday afternoon and absolut chaos reigned in Munich. A Siberian Airlines Airbus came off the southern runway and consequently blocked when the snow was at its worst. Many tramlines are still not operating and all school sports halls in Munich are still closed for fear that the roofs might cave in under the snow load. I’ve lived here for 16 years and have never seen anything like it. And more snow is to come tomorrow….
who are familiar with flygplan?
I am! “Flygplan” merely means “aeroplane” in Swedish…! The forum in the Swedish Aviation Historical Society could be a good starting point for the development history of the Viggen (which is Swedish for “thunderbolt”):
…presumably this is the location described by Kenneth.
Yes, it was 🙂
Regardless how you spell it you’re not going to find anything because they haven’t got a website! D-FMBB is apparently doing very well and is flown regularly. A photo was posted in the forum in my signature from a recent formation flight with a Eurofighter.
“Black 2” (which is registered D-FDME, D-FEHD was the registration it had when it was still a Buchon) has been seen recently doing engine runs in Manching near Munich where all of the Foundation’s aircraft are based.
Sorry for plugging this again, but the forum in my signature is a good source for news on these aircraft. A couple of spotters post pictures from Manching at an almost daily basis!You’ll have to register to see the pictures but the software is the same as this forum, so it shouldn’t be too difficult.
The signposting clearly points towards Denmark as the location.
Marines Flyvevæsen (Danish Naval Air Service) acquired two Nimrods from Hawker in 1933 and built a further 10 under licence from Hawker between 1934 and 1935. They were in service until 09.04.1940. I believe drawings from the Danish National Archives were used in the restoration of TFC’s Nimrod.
A Danish roundel seems to be visible on the upper wing of the floatplane on the left hand side in the first picture; this aircraft could be a Hawker Dantorp of the Danish Naval Air Service.
The building structure looks like the Forum exhibition hall in Rosenørns Allé in Frederiksberg, Copenhagen. This was built in 1926 and is still in use as an exhibition hall. It is definitely not the Main Station in Copenhagen!
My guess would therefore be Forum in Copenhagen, sometime between 1933 and 1935 (as the aircraft has obviously not been finished).
Unfortunately, no suitable Danish internet forum exists which I could point you towards for more help.
Where did you find the pictures? Couldn’t find them on the official RDAF homepage?
I am just in the process of letting my PPL-A lapse (having flown Bölkow Monsuns, C152, C172 and PA-28) and have converted to 3-axis microlights instead. Cheap, modern, great fun and better possibilities for flying these aircraft near my home were the reasons. Currently chartering a Remos G3/600 from a local flying school, here’s one of them:
Gorgeous aircraft – shame the Rosanik reconstruction never (?) flew. Saw it at Oshkosh in 1993:
One sunny afternoon a member in my flying club had booked our Cessna 172 to take two neighbours for their first ride in an aeroplane.
During the landing roll-out the aircraft suddenly veered off the runway at almost 90°, for undetermined reasons. Parallel to the runway – but a fairly large distance therefrom – is a stream, a row of trees and a trunk road (in that order).
Instead of letting the aircraft come to a standstill in the safety zone (which would have been perfectly possible), the pilot panicked, applied full throttle and yanked the aircraft off the ground. The flaps remained fully deployed, which in a C172 is Not A Recommended Thing.
Nonetheless, it managed to get airborne, flew over the stream, went straight through the trees and over the road (where it would have hit a bus or a lorry, if one had been there). According to eyewitnesses, the aircraft managed to gain altitude at an angle of attack which is not covered in the POH. The flaps remained fully deployed all the time. It then staggered around the impromptu circuit and made a “normal” landing, the passengers disappearing with very pale faces and the pilot voluntary surrendering his licence a few days later.
Due to the close encounter with the local flora, the aircraft required one new wing, one new strut, a new engine, a new propeller, new cowlings and two new wheel spats before it could be returned to service many months later.
The Cessna 172 may be the proverbial spam can, but I’ve always liked them and I have more than 100 hours in this particular example. I positively adore them after this incident.
I recall reading in FlyPast in the mid-eighties about a Proctor Mk.1 (the only survivor of this mark?) which crashed at La Ferté Alais. Did the remains survive? The aircraft was overall silver with RAF roundels.
Hand-held microphones? Just one of the many anachronisms and ergonomic disasters you find in those clapped out things which flying schools charge a fortune for and people still seem happy to pay through their nose to become owners of. They fit right in with the missing inertia-reel safety belts and multi-lever power controls…
Even Airlife’s General Aviation doesn’t mention it…!??
I find it somewhat hard to believe that people who have the skills and energy to be so succesful in life that they can engage in warbird flying/rebuilding are allegedly so sensitive that they get offended when someone they don’t know comments on or critizises the provenance or paint scheme of their aircraft on the Internet. Somehow this doesn’t match. If I were fortunate enough to be in a similar position I really couldn’t care one bit what other people thought in this respect.