dark light

Kenneth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 843 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Good Pics #399130
    Kenneth
    Participant

    That’s a Swiss EKW C-3605 with a turboprop indeed. It and some others started life as a C-3603 figher with a Hispano-Suiza V-12 engine in the Forties and was converted to a turboprop in the Sixties for use as a target tug, the lighter turboprop necessitating a longer nose. A third fin was added too. Most of the surviving examples were sold on the civil market in the Eighties but very few fly today. One of them has been converted back to piston power in Switzerland (I posted a pic of it in the Historic Aviation forum about a year ago or so).

    in reply to: Experience with Canon EOS-300D DSLR? #2103664
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Thanks for your qualified expert replies! As regards the “sports” mode, I formulated the posting wrongly as I was aware of the fact that it could track objects in this mode, but I am not too keen on these all-automatic modes. If I were to buy a “consumer” camera for family snapshots – which I also use the EOS-3 for now – I would be looking at a camera in the € 500-600 range. I switched from print to slide films a while ago, which my flatbed scanner is not very good at, so I’d need a slide scanner then for the aircraft photos from the EOS-3 (in order to be able to continue bothering people here with my photos) and that would be at least another € 400. Adding these up, you’re very close to the price of an EOS-300D; that was my reasoning behind acquiring this camera.

    in reply to: Disposable Camera – The original thread. #2103716
    Kenneth
    Participant

    When I get it I´ll pop out to the airport and take a photo of an A340. That’ll easily qualify as a vintage aircraft by the time the camera gets all the way round…..

    in reply to: Real aeroplane company #2104853
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I would be interested in knowing where the propeller from the Buchon comes from, since the Merlin-engined Buchons had 4-bladed props (AFAIK) . Looks like a cut down Hamilton Standard (?) off e.g. an R-1830.. :confused:

    in reply to: Good Pics #399302
    Kenneth
    Participant

    :p

    The zoom lock is a friction lock at it can be a pain sometimes. You get used to the push-pull action, but is annoying when you want to quickly focus in an out and the friction is set at full. Have a look at here, this very talented photographer uses the same lens; you’ll probably agree that the crispness of the pics make up for this handling problem.

    in reply to: German Airforce Canberra Bombers #2105394
    Kenneth
    Participant

    There is one at the Luftwaffe Museum in Berlin/Gatow and one at a small museum in Villingen-Schwenningen in South Germany. I think that the Auto-Technik Museum in Sinsheim (where an AF Concorde went) also has one.

    in reply to: Good Pics #399314
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I have the Canon 100-400mm lens and it’s highly recommendable. The pic of the Navion (which I believe has a door on the left-hand side) was taken with it. For an example of what a proper tubular spaceframe looks like, I suggest you have a look at a Caterham …. 😀 Nice pic of D-FOXY as well, as you probably know this aircraft was involved in a mid-air collision last year and has – as far as I know – not flown since its forced landing following that event.

    in reply to: Good Pics #399354
    Kenneth
    Participant

    A delightful little Kitfox

    Not quite; it’s a Eurofox which is a Czech aircraft heavily inspired by the Kitfox 🙂

    Nice pictures by the way, which camera do you use? Here’s a Navion Rangemaster landing on Hahnweide/Teck:

    in reply to: British Airways JU-52 G-AFAP"Jason" #2107083
    Kenneth
    Participant

    “D-AQUI” has P&W R-1430 engines and it actually had two-bladed props for its first couple of years on the airshow circuit. I get to see this and the Swiss Ju 52 (which have BMW engines and two-bladed propellers) regularly throughout the year here and they sound quite different.

    in reply to: Strange Rally variant ? #399710
    Kenneth
    Participant

    It is indeed a Rallye and the tailwheel u/c is not an aftermarket modification but was a factory option on some models. Looks much better like this, I think!

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2110556
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Percival Proctor Mk III OY-ACP, ex 62-605 (RDanAF), HM365 is on display in Danish AF colours at Danmarks Flyvemuseum in Helsingør in Denmark.

    in reply to: Tail Configurations #399954
    Kenneth
    Participant

    “V” tail: less weight, less drag, but problems in coupled roll/slip situations. Only on old Beeches and gliders.

    How about Fouga Magisters… 😀

    no tail, “Nurfluegler”, flying wing: no drag, no weight, restrictions in crosswind, complex input. With manual input successfully done only by the Horten brothers in WW2 and a glider from Akaflieg Darmstadt around 1990. B-2 does it with computers.

    How about the Northrop flying wings of the late Forties… 😀 😀

    in reply to: PPL – Advice? #399987
    Kenneth
    Participant

    As difficult as it may seem now that you have saved up the money for the licence, don’t start now if you are not sure that you can afford to fly regularly after you get the licence. If you have to scrounge up money for an occasional flight, these will be pure horror rather than enjoyment and it’s not very safe either. Have you considered taking up gliding now and “progressing” to powered aicraft later? It’s much, much cheaper and will turn you into a very accomplished pilot. As for becoming a professional pilot, dont’ get to fixated on this idea. Whichever way you choose (commercial/military) it’s a long way with lots of obstacles and there’s great likelihood of becoming very disappointed along the way. Keep some options open before embarking on this, e.g. by getting a degree or training in another occupation beforehand.

    in reply to: General Discussion #388484
    Kenneth
    Participant

    You have to decide for (a) birdlife in the garten, or (b) a cat. The two options are not mutually compatible! Forget about keeping the cat indoors, if it wants to get out it’ll terrorize until you give up. They always have it their way. Giving it a collar with a bell is one of the more cruel things you can do to a cat; they have extremely sensitive ears which register a much wider frequency and amplitude range than the human ear.

    Kenneth
    (Cat Host – Appointed without prior consulation by a black moggy three years ago)

    in reply to: Mieow ! #1970449
    Kenneth
    Participant

    You have to decide for (a) birdlife in the garten, or (b) a cat. The two options are not mutually compatible! Forget about keeping the cat indoors, if it wants to get out it’ll terrorize until you give up. They always have it their way. Giving it a collar with a bell is one of the more cruel things you can do to a cat; they have extremely sensitive ears which register a much wider frequency and amplitude range than the human ear.

    Kenneth
    (Cat Host – Appointed without prior consulation by a black moggy three years ago)

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 843 total)