dark light

Kenneth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 843 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker Hunter G-HUNT #2084245
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Just for the record:

    G-HUNT is ex Royal Danish Air Force 47-418, later E-418. It was delivered to 724 Squadron on 19.04.1956 and withdrawn from use on 30.04.1974. After having been in flyable storage together with the remaining Danish Hunters at Aalborg, the lot was purchased by Hawker-Siddeley in 1976 with the object of refurbishing them and selling them on to other air forces. It seemed that the market was saturated at the time, and the aircraft were passed on to (mainly British) museums (I don’t known whether G-HUNT was obtained from a museum or from Hawker-Siddeley). Only E-401 remained in Denmark and is currently on display at Danmarks Flyvemuseum in Helsingör (Elsinore) north of Copenhagen.

    in reply to: Concorde to be retired within coming months #757156
    Kenneth
    Participant

    The news media put the last nail in its coffin. The manner in which all (!) non-aviation news media blew every technical mishap out of proportion in the more and more popular “schock-horror” style scared away the last passengers. I hope that there are a lot of so-called “journalists” out there now with a bad taste in their mouth, but they are probably too busy working on articles as to how the world environment will now be saved and Heathrow/Paris residents are no longer going to live in eternal fear of a Concorde falling on their heads now that this terrible, terrible aircraft is being retired. Did someone just whisper in my ear what a technological achievement this aircraft was and how it represented what British aircraft industry was once capable of? No, must have been a mistake….

    in reply to: I would love to holiday here….. #757970
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Pembo, the island is called St. Maarten and is a part of the Dutch Antilles in the Caribbean.

    in reply to: Twin Pioneer at Bagdad Internationl #2085088
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Is that from the AP picture with a Boeing 727 wreck in the background and armoured personnel carriers in the foreground? Seems to me that it has been in use as an instructional airframe (make-shift wheels, and tailplane, outer wing panels and engines missing).

    in reply to: Wysiwyg goes back to Jersey (for a few hours!) #758575
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Highly commendable initiative!

    in reply to: USA- Plane crashes into building. #758576
    Kenneth
    Participant

    According to ABC News it was a Beech 200 King Air (which they describe as a “small plane” :rolleyes: ) which crashed into a sheet metal plant with 5 occupants onboard, all of whom perished.

    in reply to: Vimy flight #2085093
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Yet another engine change it would seem. Chevrolet got out because of product liablity fears.

    I seem to recall that it was actually BMW that wanted out because of product liability and that they tried to block its last flight with court orders. Were it not technical problems with the Chevrolet engines which brought about the change to BMW’s?

    in reply to: Foxy Lady #2087875
    Kenneth
    Participant

    This reminds me of the criticism the late Spencer Flack received from a “purist” upon painting his Spitfire in that (in my opinion very attractive) red colour scheme, whereupon his reply was something along the lines that “it’s my aircraft and I like it; when you buy your own, you can’t paint it in another colour”. This moaning about paint schemes is really Armchair Aircraft Preservation at it’s best…. 😀

    It may not be very well known in the UK, but Red Bull pleases many airshow fans in continental Europe every year with their Flying Bulls fleet comprising a B-25J, Corsair, T-28, Widgeon and two ex Luftwaffe Alpha Jets (!). They are currently restoring a DC-6B and sponsor a T-6 and a Zlin 50 aerobatic team as well. In my opinion the fact that the inventor of this vile but admittedly succesful fluid has taken an interest in flying historic aircraft is one of the best things that has happened to this movement in Europe in many years, even if entails “unoriginal” paint schemes. Think of what someone with the ressources to put Alpha Jets on the German civil register and to perform a ground-up restoration of a DC-6B can accomplish!

    in reply to: SAS low cost arm launched today. #656016
    Kenneth
    Participant

    And am I the only one to think that a “normal” airline creating a low cost division is a bit like insulting their regular customers like saying “see we could fly you for less”.

    No. Their price policy on certain European routes is outrageous.

    in reply to: Digital over 35mm – any good? #2089030
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Photography has been a hobby of mine for over 20 years now and like Roger I recently (2 years) ago invested in a new 35 mm SLR camera (Canon EOS-3). At that time a digital SLR was still beyond the reach of amateurs, but look what has happened in the meantime. Canon slashed the almost new 6 MPixel D60 with customers on a waiting list only to announce the 10D, which offers essentially the same performance for 2/3 of the price of a D60! Damien’s compressed pictures do not do full justice to the capabilities of a modern DSLR (nor to his photographic skills 😀 ), but have a look at his photos at airliners.net and I am sure discussions about quality will subside. I am also fed up with smudgy, scratched and stained lab prints at exhorbitant prices. What am I trying to say with this? I am only waiting for prices to come down further before going DSLR and I am estimating that it won’t be more than 3-5 years before a 6-10 MPixel camera will be available at prices comparable with a present high-end 35mm SLR.

    Another question is whether an amateur really needs a DSLR? Panasonic has just introduced a 2MP digital camera (sorry, forgotten the model) with an optical zoom (from Zeiss!) extending up to 400mm and an image stabilizer as well! Only costs about €600.

    Last but not least: Just like your word-processing program won’t write a bestseller on its own for you, some photographic skills and experience is still required in order to take full advantage of one of these fancy new cameras

    in reply to: General Discussion #377043
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Is it Warsteiner? Wouldn’t give that to my cat, poor thing… 😀

    in reply to: Pics of Our Pets #1960974
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Is it Warsteiner? Wouldn’t give that to my cat, poor thing… 😀

    in reply to: What time have you got? #406085
    Kenneth
    Participant

    The Monsun is a wonderful aircraft and if you ever get the chance to lay your hands on one, then don’t miss it! Being a quite small and light aircraft (about 750 kgs if my memory serves me correctly) with 150 or 160 hp (depending on the version) and usually with a c/s-prop it is quite well-powered and will do about 120 knots in the cruise. It is approved for mild aerobatics and handling is very crisp (has a stick and not a steering wheel) and visibility excellent. I learnt to fly on one and had no problems which I could relate to the aircraft. The relatively high wing loading is not to everybody’s liking, but again I didn’t consider this to be a problem. Build quality is excellent, but spare parts can be difficult to get. Braking is a bit odd, you brake with a small lever on a console between the seats, which acts on both main wheels simultaneously, and it can be locked for parking. No brakes on the pedals, which provide very precise nose-wheel steering.

    It is worth noting that it has nothing to do with the Bo 208 Junior, which is the Swedish MFI-9B built under licence (and modified) by Bölkow. The Monsun was designed by a Bölkow (later part of Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm) employee, Herman Mylius, and I think only the boxy rear fuselage was inspired by the Junior. Only about 100 of them were built in the early seventies, and they are much treasured by their owners today. Herman Mylius’ son has been struggling for some years now to put a modernized version into production.

    in reply to: What time have you got? #406105
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Not a lot: approx. 170 hrs in a Monsun, TB-200, PA-28-161, C152 and C172.

    @Moggy C: Which PA-22 have you got; a Colt or TriPacer?

    in reply to: High or low wing #406269
    Kenneth
    Participant

    In favour of high-wing (Cessna):

    – a door on each side for ease of entry and egress (only one on a PA-28);
    – sufficient ground clearance for those huge and effective flaps (which you cannot really say for the ones on the PA-28).

    As regards visibility, I agree that it’s poor on a Cessna, but it’s not much better in PA-28. The low-wing configuration only really yields significantly better visibility with a canopy like the one on a Bulldog, Katana, Monsun etc.

    As regards the nosewheels on Cessnas, I don’t have the impression that they are particularly weaker than on other designs, but many Cessnas are used as trainers where it regularly gets pounded into the ground first.

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 843 total)