dark light

Kenneth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 843 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Looking To The Future… #2090202
    Kenneth
    Participant

    It may be allright in the US for now, but just imagine another “green” wave at EU-level prohibiting all leaded fuels? Then GA will be grounded whether they like it or not. I also believe that this trend will sooner or later arrive in the US and it is my opinion that it is very dangerous ignorance not to start getting very serious about developing a replacement fuel.

    in reply to: Looking To The Future… #2090267
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I think the main problem to future operation of piston-engined warbirds will be a lack of suitable fuel. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that for example the RR Merlin was designed to use 130 octane fuel but now has to settle for the only aviation petrol available today, namely the 100 octane AVGAS 100LL. This seems to be OK as long as care is taken with the power settings, but what will happen when AVGAS 100LL is no longer available? This is a real threat in my opinion; it contains more lead than any automotive fuel ever did (which doesn’t please the environmentalists) and the demand is decreasing (which doesn’t please the oil companies). In Africa, and even in Italy, it is already becoming difficult to get AVGAS 100LL, and whether a replacement fuel will suit a fire-breathing Merlin or P&W R-2800 gives me cause for concern.

    in reply to: Bang Seats – A waste of time in GA? #406289
    Kenneth
    Participant

    Why were these aircraft originally provided with an ejection seat? Because your unlikely to get out of one in flight without it and because the usually very high wing loading (-> high approach speed, steep glide angle) renders a successful forced landing off airport virtually impossible. Hence, the ejection seat provides a margin of safety which is deleted if the seat is deactivated. And when you also consider that these aircraft are now operated outside their usual environment (military ATC, military-trained maintenance and flight crew) the remaining safety margin is much too small for my liking.

    in reply to: How good are microlights? #406430
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I am not quite aware of the regulations in the UK but in Germany those nice looking 3-axis microlights have one big problem and that is weight. A German microlight must have a BRS system and its MTOW must not exceed 472,5 kg (recently upped from 450 kg to compensate for the BRS). One of those modern and sleek 3-axs microlights with a radio, transponder and a few other extra goodies here and there will easy weigh 300 kg – empty! Then add two passengers at a conservative 80 kgs each and that leaves you with 12,5 kg for fuel, which is less than an hours flying! This is in my opinion the main problem these aircraft have. Otherwise, for economy and fun they are hard to beat.

    in reply to: The Antonov An-2… #2090425
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I am not aware of any airshow in Molllis this year, but I’ll post it here if I hear anything.

    As regards the FW190 in Munich on 17/18.05.03 it is listed as an unconfirmed participant on the website for the event (http://www.flugtag-schleissheim.de). It’ll be interesting to see if it actually appears as it has yet to make its first flight.

    in reply to: Your worst ever landing experiance? #665828
    Kenneth
    Participant

    All by my own doing… 😀

    Went out with the instructor’s blessing on one of my first solo flights in a Bölkow Monsun. When I came back to the airfield the wind had increased to about 25 knots with gusts up to 30 knots. Although straight down the runway it was incredibly turbulent and I somehow neglected to maintain the correct approach speed, touched down way too fast, bounced twice before coming to a stop at the end of the runway. The airfield employees found it hilarious and wanted me to pay three landing fees… 😡

    in reply to: Friedrichshafen #406555
    Kenneth
    Participant

    I usually try to go to every “Aero” and I essentially agree with Roger, although the emphasis is definitely on the lighter side of aviation (S/E and microlights). The organisers have for some time been very keen on bringing in more business jets but sofar they have not been that succesful. You can also fly in yourself, but be aware that they have a very rigid PPR system where you need to apply for a slot well in advance. There is usually also an airshow on Saturday and Sunday, but don’t expect too much – certainly no military jets and safety distances and minimum heights are very conservatively chosen. This year the exhibition will take place in a newly built exhibition centre on the airport itself, which looks promising. If you expect a German version of Farnborough or Le Bourget, then I wouldn’t go. However, if you want to see the latest trends in General Aviation, then it is the exhibition in Europe. In any case, the area in itself (Lake Constance) is very pretty. There is also a website: http://www.messe-fn.de

    in reply to: Most Memorable flight? #667596
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: Most Memorable flight?

    Booked on the inaugural flight from Munich to Copenhagen on a BAe 146 with the now defunct Debonair, we were all requested by the PA to report at the Debonair counter in the Departures Hall – after having checked in! Customs/Security wouldn’t let us out the way we had gotten in but gave us directions to another exit, this resulting in a group of us being trapped between two one-way doors and having to pound the glass panes until Security “rescued” us. Anyway, the aircraft had technical problems but we would be put on an SAS flight, the Debonair employee told us while merrily amending the tickets in hand-writing. Further delays occurred at the SAS counter where they understandably were not accepting tickets amended in hand-writing. Meanwhile, no notice was forwarded to Copenhagen, where people waiting for the Debonair passengers were biting their nails down to their elbows thinking that the plane had crashed. Going back, we were relieved to see a Debonair aircraft actually waiting at the gate, even more so wehen were allowed on board, only to have spirits dampened by a cheerful announcement to the effect that the flight would be slightly longer than expected as we would have to pop by Mönchengladbach to pick up some other Debonair passengers marooned there with an u/s aircraft. Now, Mönchengladbach’s runway is raather short and I was thrilled to experience the BAe 146’s short landing and take off capabilities, but it was evidently not to everybody’s liking. The sight of a lone mechanic with a clapped-out van and a DIY shop aluminium ladder with his torso buried in the innards of the culprit engine on the other BAe 146 parked on the apron (which was now full) did also not give cause for much enthusiasm among my fellow passengers. As the icing on the cake, our luggage could be reclaimed in a completely different terminal back in Munich. I never flew with them again.

    in reply to: SAS #668231
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: SAS

    I flown with SAS on countless occasions within Europe and these are my experiences:

    Positive:
    – Very punctual
    – Interior fittings always in good shape and tidy

    Negative:
    – Economy Class within Europe outrageously expensive, particularly since they joined the Star Alliance

    Neutral:
    – Cabin crew. Can be very pleasant or less so; have experienced both.

    I have to say this though:

    As a Scandinavian I always regarded flying with SAS as something special as I used to think that they had more “style” and a much better image than other airlines. I thought their old livery with the dragon head at the end of the blue cheatline was a very elegant and timeless paintscheme (in fact it lasted from the fifties with minor changes into the eighties). Nowadays I don’t have this special feeling anymore. The present livery is awfully trendy, very boring and lacks style: the combination of blue and orange is fashionable at the moment (German television (ZDF) uses it for their evening news!), but in two years time it will look completely outdated, and (worst of all) the three crowns symbolizing the three Scandinavian kingdoms have disappeared! The present corporate image simply doesn’t convey the feeling of anything special anymore.

    Anyway, did you know that SAS isn’t an acronym for Scandinavian Airlines System but for “Svensk Alt Sammen” which means “it’s all Swedish” in Danish and Norwegian?

    in reply to: Your nearest BIG airport? #669612
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: Your nearest BIG airport?

    EDDM 😉

    in reply to: Classic Airliners from Switzerland #2091794
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: Classic Airliners from Switzerland

    Yes, they did in fact; either in the form of licence-built P&W Hornets or their own BMW 132. As a matter of interest, Lufthansa’s well-known Ju 52 “D-AQUI” is equipped with P&W R-1340 (as in the Harvard) as well as three-bladed propellers and some rather ugly mufflers as a result of noise complaints from the airports where they train their crew. I see this and the Swiss Ju 52s several times each year where I live and they sound very different too.

    in reply to: Scanner test #2091815
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: Scanner test

    I think it is an ex Swiss AF Pilatus P-2 with black crosses over the red/white Swiss insignia.

    in reply to: From Munich Airport on 19.01.03… #670042
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: From Munich Airport on 19.01.03…

    Thanks for the kind comments! Incidentally, airliners.net didn’t want it; “low image quality” in their opinion….

    in reply to: The Worlds Last ST-25 Monospar… #2091926
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: The Worlds Last ST-25 Monospar…

    Glad you liked it; v-e-r-y sorry to hear about the fate of the GAL archives. I followed most of OY-DAZ’s restoration which was carried out single-handedly by a former workshop manager of Skandinavisk Aero Industri (those with the KZ-series aircraft) and it was absolutely meticulous inside and out. Even the Pobjoy Niagara engines were taken completely apart and restored with new gaskets etc. before being carefully conserved. Incidentally, there should be another Monospar in Great Britain as well, an ST-12 with the Newark Aircraft Museum. A second, airworthy ST-25 perished in a hangar fire in New Zealand in the Eighties.

    in reply to: Do you build kits? Stick em up #2091943
    Kenneth
    Participant

    RE: Do you build kits? Stick em up

    Funny you should make this posting as I was thinking of asking the same question. As airshows and private flying are having more and more restrictions imposed on them, I have rediscovered this wonderful hobby. Current project is a 1:32 F-5E (Revell) in Patrouille Suisse colours, to be followed by a 1:48 F-86D (Revell) and a 1:48 PBY-5A (Revell) which I intend to finish in Danish Air Force colours. Those of you who can read German can find a comprehensive modeller’s forum at http://www.flugzeugforum.de. Anyone out there know of a Spitfire Mk. IX in 1:32 scale?

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 843 total)