Slightly related… since it’s the same number and jet… SAAB today presented their offsets to Norway. 48 jets for 3.12 Billion USD (20M NOK) and 100% in industrial and technological offsets.
(The Gripen 39N with more thrust, more fuel, and more stores than 39C.)
< YAWN >
Eh.
Apparently you’re not capable enough to fully understand acquisition programs nor basic English language.
But nice job going OT and childishly crash Bring it On’s thread.
You’re a most valuable asset to this forum.
Siggles
You told me the whole C-17 thang was a done deal…blah blah blah blah blah you said…are you telling me now it didn’t happen? Good Lord!
I’m shocked.
:rolleyes:
YS
I never said such a thing. I don’t really remember who you are but I do remember not ever typing such a statement. So you’re a liar.
Riga summit:
Buying and putting them in the pool. One of the options I’ve pointed out earlier this year.
The jets are operated out of sovereign national requirements such as Aid relief, tactical support or training our aircrew during a Maple flag exercise.
Got a problem with that?
HEY! Maybe they’ll send the C-17s. That would so rock.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That was a exceptionally stupid remark since Sweden don’t operate C-17s yet.
Is the SwAF going to MAple Flag this year? I was talking with the Canadian head of 17 wing in Winnepeg this week and he was very impressed by the Swedes. He worked with them on the KC-130 conversions and training a few years back.
Good to hear 🙂 Let’s see.. we’ve sent c-130 units to Maple flag 5 times but never combat jets. Maple flag is mentioned in the 2007 budget but without specifying what will be sent.
We have a instructor there (at SQ419, 4Wing) since 2003.. Major Jungwallius is doing Fighter Lead In training with Hawk jets training NATO pilots.
Real good to exercise with the Americans and Canadians (and Japanese!)
The Supreme Commander just came back from visiting Red Flag NELLIS AFB and said it’s our ambition to make this a annual exercise. But he didn’t specifically say if it would be Nellis or Alaska next time. (A few years ago two 39A paid Nellis a familiarization visit.)
F-16 analogue umbilical interface not digital like on new generation jets. There’s not much off-the shelf stuff available.
Why does that helmet have “lumps and bumps” all over it??? Some kind of sensors???
” The helmet is a further development and refinement of the Striker helmet developed for the Eurofighter by BAE SYSTEMS. The Gripen Helmet System will now be marketed under the name of Cobra. “
looks like bolt or screws or something…


Here’s a small pic of the EF Striker. I couldnt find a big one.

Are any Gripen customers interested in purchasing IRIS-T?
No orders other than the Swedish AirForce… The Hungarian Air force have said they would like the IRIS-T but not in a position right now to order such a expensive missile. Instead they got an older stock of AIM-9M and a new stock of C5 amraams. South Africa is using their own weapons.
About Rafale
2020+
2020 is more of a guess though isn’t it? Afaik they have built about 60 of the 120 on order. So more like 2012 unless France order additional jets. Which will probably happen.
Switzerland likes to assemble and modify her aircrafts by herself and I don’t think the JSF will allow that.
They also prefer strong aircrafts able to land on short runways. I do think the gripen and the rafale are the best choices for the Swiss. (The F/A-18E being too big)
The gripen, is cheaper and uses the amraam already in service in the SwissAF but the rafale is safer with 2 engines and some of its parts are already made in Switzerland.
Greece has already said that she will not buy more F-16. The next order, around 1010-2012 will be a 4th generation aircraft and most probably the rafale or the eurofighter. If Greece decides to buy the JSF, they will do it in order to replace their early F-16 after 2015.
Switzerland might be able to get some used F/A-18 Super Hornets but I would also place a bet on Gripen. SAAB last year selected Swiss company RUAG as their exclusive Drop tank manufacturer. As for Rafale being safer, I don’t know, maybe, but after 75,000+ flyhours the Gripen have not had a single engine failure that led to a crash.
Yes Greece is not a easy read, jets is not the only thing they need to buy and the budget is not unlimited, but at the same time they need something new. Both to replace crashed F4/F-16 jets and a new generation jet.
When is the Rafale production line to close ? (based on current orders) I like that jet and if they can just keep the line open I bet they will score several orders.
The Gripen line has had quite an extension as the SwAF is getting 31 additional 39C jets in addition to the South African order which is just starting to move (28) and Hungary still has another 7 jets to be delivered.
But no one ever buy just a jet.. it’s political, offsets and lots of other BS in this business.. :p
October 30, 2006 (by Anonymous) – According to Janes news, Six additional countries consider joining the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program. Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President and JSF General Manager Tom Burbage said the six nations were “NATO countries or US allies” but would not disclose which countries they were.
Spain (1) , which would be looking at the F-35B short take-off vertical-landing (STOVL) variant to replace the Boeing AV-8B Harrier II Plus aircraft that it is currently operating off the aircraft carrier SPS Principe de Asturias, is certain to be one country.
The other five to join the nine partner nations of Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, the UK and the US, could include Finland (2) , Greece (3) , Switzerland (4) and potentially Israel (5) .
Looks like they can’t count.. ? Anyway I think Taiwan and South Korea possibly even Japan and Singapore is more likely than Finland and Switzerland. Israel is kind of already on. Finland just ordered a MLU for their F-18’s and Switzerland need jets sooner than JSF can deliver. But of course, they might want to join for the future.
Over at Defensenews.com this week:
Israeli F-35 Faces More Delays
After two years of study by experts working the Israeli portion of the multinational F-35 program, Tel Aviv still does not know what specific version of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), renamed the Lightning II, Washington is willing to approve for release to the Israel Air Force.
Sources from both countries said the Pentagon has offered to renew for the second time in three years what was supposed to have been a one-year contract to determine the Israeli-specific configuration of the new stealth fighter. Israel’s current so-called Phase One study contract expires in December, and both sides have agreed to extend the effort through the end of 2007.
I see his general idea. On its own the JSF doesn’t seem to fit into the picture all that amazingly as some people might propose but it’s not planned to be alone in the full spectrum warfare of the future. It might be an issue for small states such as the European JSF candidates but not for the USAF.
The Eurocanards and Russian jets is more focused on different tasks than the JSF. These are Air Superiority fighters with the added bonus of non-stealth bomb-runs. For this, the USAF got the F-22A.
One has to understand that the need for a massive fleet of air superiority fighters is not there, but a large fleet of strike jets is. Yes they are multirole but one role weigh more than the other, there’s no escaping this.
The Eurocanards is by no chance outdated nor is the F-22A (if manufacturer dates is important then well both Typhoon and Gripen 39C flew after the F-22) and still, to compare operative jets vs. jets or UCAVs in development is practically ridiculous.
Tried emailing SAAB ? They are probably quite busy atm but maybe they have a intern that can scan something…