dark light

lauriebe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 525 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Singapore 1960's #1082180
    lauriebe
    Participant

    That Javelin photo is very interesting.

    It is most likely XH754 which was operated from Changi for a period on high speed trials of the rain dispersal system that was to be installed in the TSR 2.

    Changi was chosen to take adventage of the heavy rainfalls in the tropics. The topside of the aircraft was also painted a high gloss white as part of the trials.

    This aircraft was only used for trials work by the makers, A&AEE and RAE during its service.

    lauriebe
    Participant

    Sad sight indeed. Glad the pilot got out okay.

    in reply to: Spitfire TE356..but where? #1045998
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Roland Beaumont? Tsk, tsk, Mark.:)

    in reply to: Fleet Air Arm Helicopters since 1943 – OUT NOW #1086722
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Likewise. My copy has been on order for a while now and I hope it will be delivered in the next week or two.

    in reply to: Last flight of the Javelin. #1052394
    lauriebe
    Participant

    The only sound track that I have come across:

    http://www.btinternet.com/~javelin/javelins.wav

    in reply to: Bentwaters Open House 1965 Voodoo Photograph. #1059713
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Ron, thanks for the comment on the photos and glad they were of use.

    As I mentioned in my first post, I do have some 8mm movie footage of the formation. That film is presently stored in a box in the loft of my sister’s house in Plymouth though. I seem to remember transferring it on to VHS video tape about 10 years ago and am looking for that presently.

    in reply to: The Red White and Blue picture thread ….. #1062073
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Found two more:

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5142/5679396724_75171f72d1_o.jpg
    IMG_0038 by Janner88, on Flickr

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5150/5678837335_bd301664b4_o.jpg
    IMG_0234 by Janner88, on Flickr

    in reply to: Bentwaters Open House 1965 Voodoo Photograph. #1064116
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback on the photos. Glad they were of interest.

    Doug, thanks for the info on why Olds put the formation together. will have a look around for his book.

    in reply to: The Red White and Blue picture thread ….. #1064118
    lauriebe
    Participant

    One from Me.

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4088/5080051869_9021c01a4d_o.jpg
    IMG_0002 by Janner88, on Flickr

    in reply to: Bentwaters Open House 1965 Voodoo Photograph. #1065543
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Ron, as I mentioned before, please don’t expect much. I managed to get three out of the seven into a fairly usable shot. They were all backlit and the images here have been heavily cropped into the subject. I would not normally post this sort of photo but here goes:

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5102/5667349186_4d64af341e_z.jpg

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5022/5666776999_4379a9ab3b_z.jpg

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5307/5666779319_51980461d4_z.jpg

    BTW, what was the problem with Olds’ putting this formation together? I seem to remember the commentator at the time mentioning that he was off to SE Asia soon after.

    Oh for a digital camera and the RAW file format then!!

    in reply to: Bentwaters Open House 1965 Voodoo Photograph. #1067418
    lauriebe
    Participant

    I have found 7 slides of the formation. However, I think only one or two will be usable, and then only after much tweaking.

    I am in the process of scanning at the highest resolution that I can in order to get something. Will post what I can salvage but, as mentioned before, the quality will not be good.

    in reply to: Bentwaters Open House 1965 Voodoo Photograph. #1069386
    lauriebe
    Participant

    I was at that show and have some poor quality 35mm slides and some 8mm movie footage somewhere.

    I will have a look through my collection but don’t hold out too many hopes of finding anything usable.

    in reply to: Sea Prince Colours!!! #1070693
    lauriebe
    Participant

    pagen01, sorry, I misread your post.

    Re Adrian’s formation shot earlier. I have looked at that on three different monitors. The colour stays the same across each of those. To me it is red, as are other shots taken at Culdrose at approximately the same time. As pagen01 mentions in photos with a dayglo orange colour there is a distinct difference.

    in reply to: Sea Prince Colours!!! #1070754
    lauriebe
    Participant

    I see from other pics that it has HF on the tail, so I assume it is painted to represent a Hal Far Stn Flt aircraft.
    Generaly the C.2s were for this use but T.1s were also seconded to the role, as seen in the pictures in an earlier post.

    BTW any updates on sole surving C.1 WF137 or once airworthy WP321?

    pagen01, WF128 was at Hal Far with 750 Sqn from 12.10.59 to 5.7.65. During that time it carried the codes ‘676/HF’ and ‘673/HF’. That info from the A-B book “Fleet Air Arm Fixed-wing Aircraft since 1946”. Looking forward to adding Lee’s book, which is already on order, to that.

    Looking through the internet for images of the Sea Prince I came across this page:

    http://percivalaircraft.com/

    Your post seems to indicate that the aircraft, WP321, is no longer airworthy. Has this company ceased trading as well?

    In the photo of WP321 in that link, to my mind, there is no doubt as to the colour. Call it Post Office, Cherry, whatever, the manufacturers still agree that it is red. It is the same colour that I recall seeing on the BRNC Chipmunks at Roborough in the early 70s. I do not dispute the fact that it is a dayglo type paint, but it is certainly not orange.

    in reply to: Buccaneer Shots #1076766
    lauriebe
    Participant

    Photo of WF118 taken in 1974, while she was still in service with 750 NAS. Seems to be the same colours she wears today.

    http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/372288.html

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 525 total)