dark light

SabreAce

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 201 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-16 v/s SU-30 MKI #2650990
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Originally posted by PAF Fan
    Sabreace
    The Block 60 has much more range then an ordainary F-16 and one of the best radars around as well as very advanced stand off munitions, if you think its “over priced crap”, then that reflects more on you then the F-16….

    If you wanna make cheap comments about teh PAF do it somewhere else! Cheers!

    The extra range comes at the expense of precious smooth airflow. Those draggy CFTs and the FLIR will eventually give you a small increase in range. We already know how well an F-16 reacts to large, draggy munitions it was never designed to carry.

    The Agile beam being an AESA looks promising but it’s too small with limited power. As for stand off munitions, any aircraft can be adpated to carry them.

    in reply to: F-16 v/s SU-30 MKI #2651035
    SabreAce
    Participant

    You can’t compare a small short legged fighter with limited armament, radar and equipment to a monster like the Su-30MKI be it the overpriced crap like block 60 or the glorified block-50 F-16I. Even a late model Su-27 would eat up an F-16.

    I can think of the Rafale, a fully developed one which may be able to hold it’s own. I’d choose the Su-30MKK too but the N001 is simply too limited to compare to the Bars.

    This obviously does’nt matter for the PAF where every F-7 is a superfighter. 😀

    in reply to: F-16 v/s SU-30 MKI #2651801
    SabreAce
    Participant

    This topic is BS. Xanadu, you’re an idiot for thinking that an F-16 compares with an Su-30MKI.

    As for the rest of the flame, expected!

    in reply to: F-7MG Flight Trials by Pakistan Air Force #2652718
    SabreAce
    Participant

    would ibe better for country like Pakistan to concentrate on simple and pure air defence aircraft having a powerful engine and long range radar with bvr missile.

    No, it would be better for you to concentrate on building an air defence SAM network. What you said is actually already done. In today’s context, the PAF is a purely defensive airforce.

    The Bison could carry two Kh-31P ARMs in the inner pylons for such missions.

    I doubt it. The Kh-31P is too heavy.

    The PG goes much further and is a far more maneuverable development of the J-7II with a new wing and a whole battery of combat flaps and lift devices.

    The PG should outclass any Mig-21 variant in WVR combat. Its weakness is the lack of BVR and smaller radar capacity.

    But the PG also has the same if not worse TWR. Putting a quasi LEX and increasing the wing area on a Mig-21 is’nt going to result in a supermaneuverable fighter like some nationalists try to imply here. It does give a great improvement in AoA handling. We do know that the Mig and F-5 were very maneuverable but that was in yesterday’s world. There’s also no evidence to show that the PG in PAF service has HMCS. That’s just another BS rumor.

    in reply to: PAC Gearing up for K-8 and JF-17 Production #2654638
    SabreAce
    Participant

    How many names does PLA have? He has only one and it’s M.U.N.I.R from pdef, not SyedAKM, not Hkhan!!

    How did this thread get only a 1 star rating as well?

    It must have been you! 😀

    in reply to: Price of Su-30MKI #2654644
    SabreAce
    Participant

    That’s right. Add ‘frienship price cuts’, ‘bulk order factors’, ‘ license production’, low labor costs and you’d probably get it to around $35 million. Otherwise, it would cost $50 million even by Russian standards. I know that HAL is claiming that it could build a complete Su-30MKI for $33 million but that remains to be seen.

    in reply to: Quiz time again #2655593
    SabreAce
    Participant

    YF-17 doing the cobra seems to be some fake myth just like the claim that an F-14 could do it. I’ll wait for pictures or Videos for proof. Whatever the YF-17 did, I’m sure it was’nt the same cobra we know and love today.

    in reply to: Anza 3 ready for testing #2655616
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Anza-III missile to end Indian dominance
    FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT

    Oh no! More nutty fantasies from the dregs!!

    in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2659141
    SabreAce
    Participant

    In Air superiority role F-16 does not offer any thing over

    FC-1.

    You’re correct. It offers everthing over the FC-1. 😀

    I will not rule out Mini-AWACS from 2006 and full Phalcon type

    by 2010. Which are reasonable timeline.

    So which other AESA AWACS radar is there in the world, especially an affordable one?

    Just what are you on? Maybe you should add a few UCAVs too.

    in reply to: Paper Plane Competition #2661857
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Is that Mikoyan thingie a copy of this or the other way around?

    http://www.johnmacneill.com/PS_Fighter_cover.gif

    in reply to: Formal Apology #2661911
    SabreAce
    Participant

    That’s flaming? Oh yes, I forgot. Every non-pakistani’s post containing the P word is considered flame. Poor babies.

    in reply to: Formal Apology #2661923
    SabreAce
    Participant

    The thing is Goldendragoon, that some people may get the wrong impression of your country when they see people talk like that, especially if they are pakistanis in fake ids.(even PLA draws flak here) I personally feel that it was decent of iguana to straighten things up. Now calling him a moron would put that impression back to square one.

    Hayley, I want to start a poll on how many members actually read your posts which I think is but a small, extremely bored fraction of the total. Is it alright?

    in reply to: Formal Apology #2663284
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Sheesh, I was under the impression that CMF itself had somewhat improved but the people on that pakistani forum are seriously giving their country(ies) a horrible name.

    However, there are some posters from you know where, who have the habit of posting under fake chinese names for obvious unenviable reasons.

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664198
    SabreAce
    Participant

    That was my point, sharmaji. Like I said, just for the sake of it. 😉

    Anyway, I did’nt make that pic. I just got it from this forum when it was posted earlier. Thought it was realistic. 😀

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664348
    SabreAce
    Participant

    yerna, you talking about this??

    Yes, I know it’s pointless, but like phrozenflame said, just for sake of it>

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 201 total)