dark light

SabreAce

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 201 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: An interesting question from PakistanDefense: #2664832
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Is this forum getting dumber by the minute? Some dumbfk at one of the world’s dumbest, most flamy forums built for the nationalist community of a country with questionable credibility dreams up some crap and you post it here?

    I’m sure the IAF will buy some JFI-17s, QJFI-17s that is.

    http://pakistanidefence.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=27616

    in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2665589
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Good post.

    Yeah Soviet aircraft lacked RWR, Flares, countermeasures and

    even radars and were droping bombs by hands and were carrying

    only guns no concept of missile. This thing look more funnier than

    initially thought.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2665608
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Why does pakistan need the Ghauri when the Shaheen-2 does everything and more? If you track the developments, you’ll see that pakistan started to establish infrastructure for longer range BMs with the Ghauri, like when they imported lathes from NK. Is it possible that Sameen Mubarakband(sp?) who fathered the Shaheen programmes, stole khan’s research? Now the guy has a monopoly.

    I would say that is quite an achievement

    I agree. Goldendragoon must be very proud.

    iridium, no pakdeaf or pakistanidefence sources or quotes please.

    in reply to: Pakistan Tests Shaheen II #2667713
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Can any pakistani try to answer these without bringing the usual india paranoia and BS?

    1. Will the Shaheen-2 supplant the Ghauri in Pakistani Service?
    2. Is this an attempt to show that the BM development will continue despite the lead scientist whose products such as the Ghauri equip pakistan, being dishonoured?

    I don’t think that the white shaheen is the correct video and looks more like the Shaheen-1. I chanced to encounter the green one being test fired somewhere else..

    in reply to: Now, IAF has trouble with ammunition #2668806
    SabreAce
    Participant

    was blowing up 80 trucks with ammos during the last stand off and loosing few hundred soldiers part oif the training excercise also, not that it doesnt happen with other armies, but they don’t come up with excuses like you just came up with.

    Sigh, yet another attempt by your neighbourhood pakistani troll to try and start a flamewar.

    One single R-73 failed. So what? Missiles fail all the time. And just how does that spell disaster for the Su-30MKI that fired it? If you were also to choose between older stocks and newer ones for practise or demos, the choice is also obvious. Just for the record, check SIPRI for the most recent R-73 orders by the IAF.

    The triggers bit does’nt make any sense either unless ammo exploded aboard the aircraft and that did’nt happen.

    http://www.devilbunnies.org/pictures/spam.jpg

    in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2668815
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Adding to the list

    567: Pakistan captured Tomahawk missiles and sent em’ to China.
    568: PAF kicked Soviet ass.
    569: An-26s can carry Exocets and mines.
    570: (CLICK TO INSERT NEW PAK CLAIM)

    PAF Fan, you have clearly said that An-26s can carry Exocets. Please expand on that. You clearly know something that others don’t.

    You’ve also implied that the PAF took off but was too late to save the Atlanque. That’s the first time I heard of that. Those indian migs were up in the on an intercept course for quite a while. Don’t tell me that your ground radar did’nt pick em’ up just like the indian radar picked up the Atlantique? I’m curious, PAF Fan. If IAF aircraft, especially ones with short legs like the Mig-21, can happily fly in, score a kill and fly back, and the PAF is “too late”, it speaks volumes about the PAF’s lack of capability, don’t you think?

    What’s up with the ACIG article anyway? It’s a good one but does’nt in anyway show anything grandiose regarding the PAF’s sorties. Why are you guys going on about it again and again? Even that article mentions the RoEs which made it a turkey shoot for the PAF. :confused:

    in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2669266
    SabreAce
    Participant

    PLA you’re seriously dumb to think that the pic is that of the Il-76. It’s more likely the Gulfstream-5 Phalcon being built for Israel.

    Have any of you actually been inside an Il-76, especially a civilian one? It’s huge and wide!!!

    in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2669286
    SabreAce
    Participant

    PAF Fan, An-26s can carry exocets and mines? I’m sure you can show us. 😉

    I guess you also think that there’s no difference between a cargo bay with a ramp and a bomb bay?

    I always put forward one question which no pakistani can seem to answer – According to official pakistani stances, the Atlantique was inside pakistani territory. So where was the PAF?

    I also wonder why all pakistanis respond to everything from literally everyone starting with “you indians” and follow it up with a dose of whine and BS. The real indians must laughing their asses off at how scared and initimiated the pakistanis are, although sometimes you can’t blame them pakistanis and their range of associated complexes. Strangest thing is that it first started with russia bashing.

    in reply to: PAF over Afghanistan [Russian Perspective] #2669975
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Yes, we’ve all read the ACIG report but what’s your point? Are you saying that there were no RoEs?

    PS The Atlantique can carry Exocets, bombs, mines….you know…

    in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2669983
    SabreAce
    Participant
    in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2670605
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Does anyone fkin know if the Phalcon is AESA or PESA?

    PS Munir, where was arthur talking about diversity? You -> Krazy!

    in reply to: Chile's Phalcon : The IAI Condor #2671408
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Is the phalcon an AESA or PESA?

    in reply to: More complaints about F-16I #2671426
    SabreAce
    Participant

    I thought that it was Principal skinner and not Rev. lovejoy.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2671436
    SabreAce
    Participant

    Munir, do you get kicks out of making your jealosy evident?

    in reply to: Contract Signed (for the 10th time) #2672102
    SabreAce
    Participant

    LOL. No kidding!

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 201 total)