dark light

sealion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • sealion
    Participant

    Summary of the “big5” article

    There are 2 parts. The 1st part quotes from Kanwa and http://www.fas.org. It states that the J-10 is superior to F-16A/B, Mirage-2000 and IDF. It also mentioned that the IDA is no longer produced due to its mediocre performance.

    The second part of the article can be accessed by clicking the picture. It quotes from a major Taiwanese defense magazine. It is not an official publication, though. The article speculates on how the Taiwan conflict will unfold, with J-10 mixed in the picture.

    First wave missile attack

    First wave missiles destroy most airport runways, air-defense sites and command-control posts. The Taiwanese air force cannot expect to get more than 40 fighters in the air on time.

    PLAAF gains air superiority

    The 200 or so attacking Su-27, J-10, J-8 and J-7s (May I add JF-17) will shoot down all Taiwanese fighters that manage to take off. Prolonged PLAAF interdiction in Taiwanese air space will prevent airport repair and future take-off. With the loss of air superiority, the Taiwanese navy is doomed.

    ————————————————————————-

    I have to say that the J-10 has at least won the psychological warfare over Taiwan.

    in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2548121
    sealion
    Participant

    I would agree with Egberto. The U.S. Army is in a true quagmire in Iraq right now. This is clearly demonstrated in Thomas E. Rick’s “Fiasco”, if you bother to read the 400+ page book in some detail. After reading the book, I have the impression that a groud war between the U.S. army and Iran is next to impossible, let alone with North Korean.

    After reading the book, I also have the impression that Chairman Mao must be laughing in his crystal coffin in Bejing right now. The U.S. army, with all its might, is suffering from the “people’s war” wracked by the insurgency. From a culture point of view, this is understandable. The U.S. society itself is a “winner-take-all” society. They simplely do not care about the basic needs of the Iraqi people. As a matter of fact, the U.S. goverment does not take care of its own sick and poor that well either. Just look at the mess of the healthcare system in the U.S., and how they treated their own people in New Orleans after Katrina. The U.S. Army will never win the hearts and mines of the poor people in Iraq, which is the vast majority of the population.

    To be fair, I suspected that one of the major reasons that the Arab countries performed less than idealy in the Middle East wars was that these countries were full of traiters. Everything eventually boils down to human intelligence. If you believe that satellites, Joint Stars and UAVs can see it all, you will be in a rude awakening, just like the U.S. army in Iraq. This is one of the reasons that an airstrike against North Korean is also unlikely. Besides the 800 pound gorillas called China and Russia sitting there, the U.S. does not really know where all the labs are, due the the lack of human intelligence. An airstrike against NK is too late anyway.

    sealion
    Participant

    Why every argument has to have the Chinese involved? If the Russians withdraw from the treaty, that is because

    1.Russian economy has recovered, with the help of current oil price; 2.NATO is sitting squatly at Russia’s boader, and the U.S. military has outstayed their welcome in the former Soviet states.

    The Soviet Union was duped to sign this treaty, thus surrendered their leverage againt the NATO airpower. In my opinion, airport interdication was and is the most feared use of IRBMs against U.S.. With the current air superiority enjoyed by the U.S., I will not be suprised that Russia withdraws from the treaty unilaterally.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2589359
    sealion
    Participant

    Sabotage?

    Is the accident a result of espionage? Who ordered to have so many experts onboard? Something is fishy here.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force in deep crisis #2565312
    sealion
    Participant

    Whatever the article you guys are talking about, it is outdated. With the current oil price, it is just a matter of time that the Russians will pull themselves out of the hole. Unlike other oil countries, Russia has great industrial potential. If they can use their oil money wisely, you will see Russian economy taking off in no time.

    in reply to: Pumpjet propulsor #2078205
    sealion
    Participant

    I have the impression that one of the major problems of pumpjet is the clogging up by sand and mud while operating in shallow water or near shores. Pumpjets are also difficult to clean up and rust easily.

    Even conventional propellors may have clogging problems while operating in dirty water. In fact, the Chinese Navy are kind of proud of themselves that they pretty much solved this problem. Remeber all those pictures in which the Chinese submarines are sailing in the extremely muddy inland river ? You better know what you are doing in that kind of environment !

    in reply to: Pumpjet propulsor #2078362
    sealion
    Participant

    the Seawolf is claimed “to be quieter at 20kts than a 688I tied at the pier” and the pumpjet probably contributes a lot to this.

    Pumpjet or not, the 688I has to be running at full power without lubrication oil, while being tied at the pier, to surpass the noise level of Seawolf at 20 kts 😀

    By the way, the Seawolf class is the first full-size submarines to be equipped with bow thrustors (2 on each side), which give it unprecedented low speed manueverability and docking capability. Bow thrustors have been used on tugboats and small submersibles, and now are widely used on large surface vessels also. Is anyone aware of other large submarines with bow thrustors ?

    in reply to: y is china unable to build large aircraft? #2627025
    sealion
    Participant

    Few companies in the world can build economically competitive large passenger aircraft (those that can make trans-atlantic/pacific flight) now. There were more in the past, but fewer now.

    But military cargo plane is another story. From what I saw on the internet, I believe China’s large cargo plane programme will start in the near future.

    Regarding how freely people can move in China, here is an interesting fact: Chinese are building highways in a frenzy. In fact, China’s freeway, or limited-access expressway, ranks second in total mileage in the world (http://english.people.com.cn/200410/29/eng20041029_162122.html), it may surpass the U.S. if they keep building at this rate. The hardware for moving people around is already there, isn’t it ?

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 6 #2647965
    sealion
    Participant

    Regarding the “WZ-10 picture”

    There have been speculations that the Agusta A129 technology had been sold to China. It seems to me that the picture somehow resembles the A129, especially when you look at the rear wheel assembly. But there are major differences: A129 has 4-blade main rotor and 2-blade tail rotor, but the one in the picture has 5-blade main rotor and asymmetrical 4-blade tail rotor, which indicates that it is bigger and heavier than A129.

    in reply to: Japan hunts intruding submarine amid alarm over China #2067172
    sealion
    Participant

    The submarine might be in mechanical trouble.

    According to a major Chinese newspaper published in the U.S. and chinesenewsnet.com, Japanese found a Chinese submarine rescue vessel and a tugboat in that area several days ago, which was a ominous sign that a troubled Chinese submarine was nearby.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2621085
    sealion
    Participant

    I have the impression that the retinas in your eyes may separate under 13-14 Gs.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2637490
    sealion
    Participant

    Look like an An-124. Could be used to carry those mobile ICBM/micro-satellite launchers around.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2653660
    sealion
    Participant

    😮 That naval MRLS, could it be a metal-storm thing ? 😀

    in reply to: Friction between China and Japan to lead to war? #2666004
    sealion
    Participant

    http://www.unsustainable.org/view_art_un.php?AID=307

    The Sun and the Dragon: America’s Wishful Thinking About Sino-Japanese Relations

    This is an eye-popping article! After reading the article, it seems to me that there will be no guarantee that Japanese military will be directly involved in a conflict between U.S. and China over Taiwan.

    Also, now I finally understand why the Nationalist (pre 1949) and Communist governments of China never asked for retribution from Japan publicly: the governments wanted to keep the money themselves! Obivously, had the retribution been paid publically, it would have been paid to the victims and their families directly, and the governments themselves would not have been able to keep the money!

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2666144
    sealion
    Participant

    jet pumps propulsion (!)

    Actually, a pump-jet on a kilo class submarine is not as far-fetched as you thought:

    http://submarine.id.ru/galery/t269.jpg

    A little more info in this thread: http://forum.airforces.info/showthread.php?t=28058

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)