dark light

Anant

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 97 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rockets Red Glare #2215867
    Anant
    Participant

    😀 hmm not red but also not yellow
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235845[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235846[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2220797
    Anant
    Participant

    ^^ Thanks Teer, as always over the years I have always enjoyed your inputs in this forum, which puts things in right prespective. There was a recent tweet from Saurav Jha:

    “The aggressive timelines for the AMCA are on account of relaxed requirements on the aerodynamic side. HAL will be the lead integrator.”

    Teer any idea what are the aerodynamic requirements that got relaxed for AMCA. And what probable new aggressive dates we ought to anticipate? Is it that because AMCA will more geared towards AGM/SEAD/DEAD roles rather than highly agile dogfighter? (A pure uninformed speculative hypothetical question)

    I must say the wind tunnel model looks quite sleek:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]235418[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2221253
    Anant
    Participant

    France is as independent as it gets. Not sure what you’re going on about Rii, but the Rafale deal is not an American arms purchase. Tejas is partially one, but it’s probably using more Russia content than U.S. content by every measure.

    ummm.. The only internal Russian Content that we will see in Tejas is Gsh 23 Gun. It will be carrying Russian, Western, Indian weapons that are in IAF stock. Dont know on what basis you can say that Tejas is using more Russian Content? Engine is American of course. Avionics is mix of Indian, Israeli, Western…

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1788069
    Anant
    Participant

    India Reveals Intermediate Range SLBM: K-4

    http://i.imgur.com/qKFuDAN.gif

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2234343
    Anant
    Participant

    seems to me we heard that same sentence last year about the same period…

    as said by swerve, the problem lies in the fact that India wants Dassault to be responsible for everything, while Dassault simple can’ty do that (as no company could). Last year, we had Dassautl complaining that HAL did not build infrastructures as required by Dassault and even refused Dassault engineers the right to inspect the facilities. How in such situation, could Dassault agree to sign to be responsible for what HAL does in the end?

    One can only be so sure if an official statement from GOI ‘s MoD is issued stating “Dassault will be held for HAL’s fault”. All we have heard from def minister hinting in recent interview that problems are arising because of Dassault not agreeing to adhere to RFP. Now what are those terms of rfp? He did not tell as negotiations are still going up.

    Until then to believe hunch and so called unnamed sources of Indian media would be foolishness.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2235568
    Anant
    Participant

    Thanks for info. Hard to believe they did not start addressing this issue when initially introducing the type, considering the size of the eventual fleet.

    From the above article:

    Setting up the overhaul facility at Nashik, and overhauling the first Su-30MKI has taken 14 years. This is because the initial contract, signed in 2000 for building 140 fighters in India, did not cater for establishing an overhaul facility — a mistake, say contract lawyers.

    in reply to: India successfully launch new GSLV MK3 launch vehicle #2247898
    Anant
    Participant

    Well this vehicle is more important in terms of a) Future Indian Human Spaceflight Program b) Future Heavier Commsat launching capability, eliminating need to go to ESA for launching Heaving Comm Satellites. c) Heavier Interplanetary Missions. … and so on. But that is quite away in future as this was just experimental flight with passive Cryogenic engine simulating 3rd stage. Next Complete test of LVM-3 Rocket along with proper cryogenic engine is at-least good 2 years away.

    http://www.isro.org/gslv-mkiii-x/Imagegallery/launchvehicle_images/gslv-mkiii-x-12.jpg
    http://www.isro.org/gslv-mkiii-x/Imagegallery/launchvehicle_images/gslv-mkiii-x-13.jpg
    http://www.isro.org/gslv-mkiii-x/Imagegallery/launchvehicle_images/gslv-mkiii-x-16.jpg

    PS: I think this thread could be moved under Indian Missile Thread. Though I strongly support another forum sub-section for keeping track of space related activities world over. With new round of heightened space activity by various nations other than P-5 nations, these are interesting times. US, Russia, China, Korea, Japan, Brazil, Iran, India etc coming up with new interesting programs. It would be quite good to keep track and follow space activities in a separate space section.

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1788242
    Anant
    Participant

    Russia seems to have supplied China with Brahmos/P800 system.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]233651[/ATTACH]

    China has its own copy of BrahMos Supersonic cruise missile Now

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2254629
    Anant
    Participant

    HA HA HA HA!

    They’d do well to take a good look in the mirror, smell the coffee and go get the glass roof of their procurement house in order before throwing stones because they’ve no artillery pieces left.

    [howzat for mixing metaphors eh? :very_drunk:]

    Well India is the customer, is paying monies for the aircraft, hence very well demand /ask whatever was promised… Regarding setting procurement house in order would mean less orders for outside world 😉 so it benefits certain people if Indian procurement house is in dis-array.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2243717
    Anant
    Participant

    General Elections are very near in India, and this is the time when the Govt tries to avoid any controversies in big ticketed deals especially related to defense. Wait for the next govt.

    Anant
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]216967[/ATTACH]
    This is not Brahmos 2 but HSDTV, which is a separate program.

    in reply to: Will the IAF remove the PLA from Indian territory? #2274466
    Anant
    Participant

    What about Kashmiri muslims, who make up the majority, what do they want? Therein lies the problem for India.

    As I’ve said before, Pakistan, India and China are not really concerned with addressing the right of self determination of ALL Kashmiris, no matter what their ethnicity or religion.

    You are ready to ignore minorities, because they are not muslims 😡 They have been systematically cleansed, driven out of the valley by B@STARD jehadi terrorists over the years. They yearn to be in India, so shall it will be. India is not meant for one particular religion unlike Pakistan. And its constitution does not entertain any whim fancies, based on some Jehadi communal fantasies, Chanting Yindu Yehudi Murdabad .. Pakistan paindabad will not yield to anything

    in reply to: Will the IAF remove the PLA from Indian territory? #2274480
    Anant
    Participant

    I suggest you head north from mumbai to Indian occupied Kashmir, you’ll get a better account from the Kashmiris about the situation on the ground.

    I am from “North”. Only pakistan backed jehadi and Islamic Terrorists wants Azzadi and support bloodshed of innocoents. Kashmiri Hindus, Budhists, Sikhs , Christians they all want to be part of India. They are angry against Indian govt, because they feel that for the vote bank sake they have gone too far in appeasing and tolerating $hit from Islamic sepratists, and in turn ignored their plight

    in reply to: Will the IAF remove the PLA from Indian territory? #2275317
    Anant
    Participant

    At this point it is not about Kashmir being Muslim, contiguous with Pakistan, etc. It is about how India has systematically alienated the population by its brutal occupation. The popular sentiment is not for union with Pakistan, it is for the eviction of India!

    If by this you mean that Kashmir independent of India would be taken advantage of by Pakistan, I agree. Neither nation is interested in a solution, and this is why one has not emerged. Like Okinawa for Japan and the United States, Kashmir is a mere political football for India and Pakistan with scant regard for those who live there. Nevertheless, as the occupying power engaged in upholding an unjust status quo, the lion’s share of the blame lies with India, as it lies with Israel on the Palestinian issue.

    Ahh another rant by bigoted guy for whom Pakistanis are angels and what Muslims did to non muslim Kashmiris brethren is something to be ignored. For whom only Jehadi Islamists are angels, rest all are evil :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Will the IAF remove the PLA from Indian territory? #2276980
    Anant
    Participant

    The correlation between injustice and condemnation in the theatre of world opinion is, sadly, very weak. And India is one of the major benefactors of that. For all its inefficacy, Tibet is at least an active issue in world opinion. The same can’t be said for India’s ongoing occupation of Kashmir.

    :highly_amused:
    You just be smoking some really powerful stuff that you deluded yourself to think that *you* have the right to paint *your* bigoted opinion as what the whole world opinion is? :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 97 total)