dark light

Frazer Nash

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 251 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BE2 roll out #1179502
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Really lovely. Beautiful timber, stunning joinery.

    in reply to: Dambusters remake Lanc unveiled #1183188
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Wasn’t Barnes Wallis working on a four engined Wellington, how close was that to flying?

    I’m getting into an area where I’ve got no idea what I’m blithering on about!!!

    I think you might be talking about the “Victory Bomber”. This was a 6-engine geodetic construction high- altitude bomber conceived by Wallis in 1940 to carry his proposed 22,000lb ‘penetrating bomb’.

    It got to the wind tunnel testing stage, but the fact that it could only carry one of the proposed bombs at a time caused the Air Ministry to reject it. There was also some concern over the time it would take to put the aircraft into production.

    Hope this helps!!

    in reply to: B-17 gets a polish #1198698
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Yep James is right: anything that’s new, shiny or technologically advanced (in Australia this can be anything from a time-travel machine to a electric toaster oven)

    “Mate, this new microwave’s the grouse. Look, it does roast beef, pasta, the works! Pretty schmick, eh?!”

    in reply to: B-17 gets a polish #1199044
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    In a nutshell. Pretty darn schmick for mine!

    in reply to: Howard Hughes film – "Hells Angels" #1200222
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Just a little further information; quoting from the non-fiction novel ‘Richthofen’ by William E. Burrows:

    “Hughes assembled 50 airplanes, including a Gotha bomber, into the largest non-governmental air force in the world, and based them on a complete period airdrome near Van Nuys, California….Ten camera planes were used to photograph what, by December 1927, had become 87 combat airplanes.”

    I know this doesn’t answer your question one iota, but it’s a nice little aside!

    in reply to: B-17 gets a polish #1201210
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    The Americans do the same thing with their classic cars and over-restore them to a finish that would be just too expensive on a production model, even a Ferrari or Bentley. My personal view is that the patina on the OFMC Spitfire MH434 is absolutely right as it looks as though it is in regular front line service.

    Funny you should mention this. It was finally realised not too long ago that of the stunning classic cars at Pebble Beach (THE Concours show in the U.S.) many of the entrants were what was termed “over-restored”. In other words, pieces were chromed that shouldn’t have been, cast iron pieces had been ground smooth and powder-coated when they were originally brush-painted in their raw state….you get the picture. Now I can’t say for sure what the outcome of this lightning-bolt of realisation was, but I do know it was accepted that ‘concours’ trophies were being awarded to vehicles that were indeed completely at odds with the definition of concours.

    However, I’d sure as ******y rather have those folks spend that money restoring those beautiful pieces of history that way rather than sending them to the crusher.

    I doubt very much whether Delta’s “Ship 41” looked as stunning in the 30’s as it does now. But what a beautiful aircraft! What an amazing restoration!

    I once watched, not too long ago, a self-proclaimed ‘officiando’ and ‘enthusiast’ refuse to get on a vintage steam train because it was pulling the wrong era carriages, in his opinion, and he thus proceeded to hold court with his disciples on ‘everything that is wrong with the steam enthusiasts of today’.

    He failed to see the ecstatic, laughing faces of families as they steamed out of the station for a one-hour glimpse of times past. Jerk-off.

    in reply to: What's on your doorstep #1209653
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Point Cook RAAF Base, along with the RAAF Museum; RAAF Base Laverton, which is awfully fast disappearing under attack from bloody property developers, and Essendon Aerodrome, which too is under threat from individuals who may or may not have a vested interest in the extremely valuable dirt it sits on (and has since 1913). Now, 90-odd years later, it appears it’s a menace to society and so terribly dangerous.

    You’ve upset me now……:mad:

    in reply to: I missed Avalon airshow(again) how was it this year #1225361
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Well, as we’re paying for it, I’d like something for my money. 😡

    Too true. I’d like something for my money that goes into the Grand Pricks, too!

    in reply to: I missed Avalon airshow(again) how was it this year #1228604
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    In short: Who needs Avalon??!! There’s far too much fantastic stuff in the offing for the likes of us……

    in reply to: I missed Avalon airshow(again) how was it this year #1228691
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I was discussing this with a friend of mine who was in the general aviation industry when Avalon was held for the first time. As far as we are both concerned, Avalon was always first and foremost a trade show, aimed at the aviation industry.

    However, it appears that some bright spark has hit upon the idea of marketing it as an airshow and thus throwing the doors open to the general public. This in itself is not a bad thing, as long as the show itinerary is also engineered to the general public. Unfortunately, I dont think it has been.

    Avalon 2007 featured an identical flying program for both Saturday and Sunday, which would rate in my book as one of the most thoughtless and condescending acts I have ever seen from a group trying to take my hard-earned in return for promised entertainment.

    I think the organisers better make up their minds whether they are holding a trade show or an airshow, right after they look up the definitions of both in the dictionary.

    Great Victorian airshows? Tyabb and Point Cook. A lovely day out for all concerned.

    in reply to: An aircraft's true identity (2003 Zombie) #1180626
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Truth be told (as he drains another Tasman Bitter) I brought this subject up when I first joined the forum: that on painting aircraft “to represent the one flown by…etc etc”

    The consensus of opinion was it was the owner’s perogative.

    I hated seeing the most recently restored F4U Corsair emerge in Ira Kepford’s colour scheme…and how many Memphis Belles do we need?

    However!!!! Not too long ago, the thought of having so many Corsairs, Forts, Hurris et al airworthy and / or on public display was an absolute pipe dream. Believe me, if that Corsair flew over my house I would not be standing in the backyard shaking my head with pursed lips saying ” yes, very nice I’m sure, but it’s not the right colour, is it?!”

    I think it maybe boils down to groundpounders like myself merely expressing a wistful dream; that of “if I had the money, I’d buy this aircraft, restore it this way, paint it this colour…..” I really can’t believe folks would turn their noses up at any historic aircraft because it wasn’t done to their liking.

    (Another Tasman)…as for Friday 13th: I live in Australia. We don’t have a Halibag here, composite or otherwise. I followed the construction of it via the excellent UK magazines, and I have to say real or not it’s bloody fantastic!!!!

    Back to the beer fridge…..

    in reply to: Film horrors #1196601
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Steve, I just had a bit of a look and couldn’t find that Binbrook ghost posting….can you offer some guidance please?

    in reply to: Film horrors #1196630
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Agreed, but I don’t count PH as an aviation film.
    More like history in the hands of schoolboys.

    “Pleez dun tayg mah wingz ma’am….”

    I’d be more worried about her taking his Actor’s Equity card, on general principles!!

    in reply to: Film horrors #1196635
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Yes, but fun to look at.
    Perhaps it should be celebrated as being perhaps the last aviation film to use real airplanes? 😀

    Now correct me if I’m wrong, but was there a B17 written off during the filming of this film?

    My votes for favourite would have to include The Sound Barrier and The War Lover. (even though this is well off-topic)

    Great thread!

    in reply to: Film horrors #1197086
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I do have to to whack my two’penn’s worth in…..

    Pearl Harbour was well up there with BackDraught for the sheer ability to make one cringe with embarassment (I’m a firefighter, that’s why I’ve mentioned it.)

    However, lest it be thought I’m Yank-bashing, I have to say I always had real trouble understanding the actors in Battle of Britain. It’s only when I got the DVD and put the subtitles on I was able to decipher what was actually said!

    The worst aviation film ever made? Memphis Belle. Truly awful.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 251 total)