I use a product called bio-deruster, sounds a very similar product to the above sugestion. Uses a chelation process.
Doesn’t burn and removes all the oxidisation right into the pits. Great for seized assemblies and doesn’t harm plastics, rubber or even touch paint or chrome. Cast iron emerges from an overnight soaking a nice uniform grey.
Blasting is pretty agresssive.
If you can find a company that does soda blasting (as in bi-carb), then you’ll find that is an extremely gentle medium. It is possible to take paint off layer by layer, and it’s good for the environment.
I’ve used it on various classic car and motorcycles panels etc, and it’s very impressive.
When I started working as a vol with the RAAF Museum, I was careful not to offer my limited abilities to the actual ‘restoration’ of the museum’s aircraft, purely because the long-term blokes there certainly had it under control, and I must assume were clearly happy to comply with the wishes of the museum, whichever direction they took.
Instead, I happily ended up in the archives section, or walking around as an ‘on-the-spot’ guide, if you will.
I digress. Folks, I think that as a volunteer, while we may feel we have an ‘implied’ say in the museum’s direction, in the cold, hard light of dawn we have none. (indeed, I came across one or two vols who considered they owned the museum, but that’s another story…..grumpy old ******s..)
I would like to believe though that any museum would extend any and every available courtesy with regards roll-outs, disposals and commemorative occasions to the very people who have made it all possible free of charge.
As I understand it, the original picture on “Marge” was a very large photograph pasted on the nose.
The artwork on Bong’s P-38 was a facsimile of a photo of Marge, his then-fiancee. I’ll stand corrected, but an officer in the admin section of his squadron had the know-how to enlarge it and it was indeed pasted on the side of the aircraft and covered with lacquer by Bong’s crew-chief.
An extraordinarily pretty lass!
You blokes worry me at times. It’s a Sopwith Camel; anyone can see that.
Maybe the only reply to Proc would be “Thank God we had all 3!!!”
Exactly. If one type’s contribution is “more important”, then it must follow that the men who flew or died in other types somehow were “less important”, a clear nonsense. This would have been a question best kept unvoiced, if you ask me.
I really don’t think that was what Proc was implying, Web. I’ve always been of the opinion that the only stupid question is the one you don’t ask.
Best regards for the New Year!
Been watching a f British videos over the break and I started to wonder what Bomber played the more important role in liberating Europe during WW2, the Liberator (B24), the Flying Fortress (B17) or the Avro Lancaster?
I suspect that its a toss-up between the B17 and the B24.
cheers
Without going into facts, figures, quotes and slide rules, I’ll go with Proc’s subject title: “most significant”. It has to be the Lancaster: British designed, British built, crewed by members of the Commonwealth, easily recognisable (by sight and sound), and lauded by Harris after the conflict.
Absolutely stunning Elliot, I know there are more than a few Aussie enthusiasts following the Whitley Project with much excitement! Great stuff!!!
Roberts Dunstan was sent to the Middle East as a sapper and lost a leg after being wounded by a shell splinter just before the siege on Tobruk. He had lied about his age to get into the army, and was now facing a life with one leg, having barely experienced his ‘great adventure’. Subsequently he badgered the RAAF until they accepted him as an air gunner, in the best Bader tradition.
He flew as a Lancaster rear gunner with 467 Sqn, preferring to leave his aluminium leg on the ground, as it was easier to crawl around the aircraft. He also had more room in the turret than other gunners!
I have to say my favourite was the Japanese ground troops’ inevitable cry when they were being strafed……
“AIIEEE!! I DIE!”
The RAAF Museum in Point Cook, Victoria has a few bits and pieces of the triplane, as does the Australian War Memorial. The stunning new WW1 Aviation Museum in New Zealand (which name escapes me, but it’s run by Graham and Jane Orphan) has some of the wing fabric. I seem to remember reading the aluminium seat is in Canada, but I’ll happily stand corrected on that……
It’s worth bearing in mind that the last genuine Fokker DR1 was destroyed by Allied bombing during WW2, so we’re probably lucky that so many pieces of Richtofen’s triplane were souveniered when it came down and thus they’ve survived for us to study today.
Yes the rear gunner was always in his turret from go to whoa. Some squadrons insisted rear gunners turn their turrets to port or starboard with guns depressed on take-off so as to avoid any accidental discharge into the aircraft behind. You will notice this in some period film clips.
It was a very lonely and frightening way to go to war. If (and that’s a big ‘if’) you saw a nightfighter there was no-one to turn to: the survival of the aircraft and crew was solely down to you.
We won’t see their likes again.
There was a Mk1 and Mk2 type ‘E’ turret for the Halifax, but they are all but identical. There was no room for a parachute in the turret, but if I remember correctly, towards the very end of the war some pilot-type parachutes became available for the rear gunner.
The type ‘E’ turret was well-liked by its crews, and was unique in that the four .303 guns were mounted on their sides to facilitate the feed mechanism. It was controlled by a single ‘joystick’, with the trigger button on top.
Muchly hoping this is of some use!
Thanks Dave,
Here’s one of RAF Sylt taken in 1945. I’ve tweaked it all I can and hope some things are recognizable. Seems to be a JU88R (coded S) under inspection, the Liechtenstein can be seen in the original shot. Behind, an Auster coded 9 and the aircraft to the right with a G on the tail also has an 8 on the fuselage behing a large white circle. The airfield is littered (in the nicest way) with Tempests or Typhoons, with one in the circuit. There also seems to be a detonation in the background.
brgds
Alan
It looks like everyone standing on the Ju88 and the hangar roof are all looking over at the ‘detonation’, so there’s every chance it was something loud and entertaining!
I seem to remember reading that landing the Bulldog was like “trying to control a loaded wheelbarrow at arm’s length”.
Correct me if I’m wrong (not an unheard-of occurance) but I think it was in “in The Cockpit”