dark light

Frazer Nash

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 251 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Maybe he wants a bigger boat?

    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Actually, and without meaning any disrespect to Ms. York, I found her appearance in the BoB film to be as unrealistic as the famous illuminated door button.

    I have to say it’s always surprised me that with all the effort made to recreate a Spitfire squadron of 1940, no-one noticed that Section Officer Harvey shared the same hair stylist as Barbara Windsor.

    And why does Sqn Ldr Skipper have to be so unbelievably grumpy and snarly??

    in reply to: F4u wings #1157299
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Excellent points James! I do know that in the early stages of the Korean War, Corsair pilots attacking ground targets were experiencing an unexpected tendency of the fighter to roll on pullout. This was finally attributed to warped wooden ailerons, and was solved by their replacement.

    in reply to: F4u wings #1088097
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    You might want to bear in mind that Vought was awarded the contract to build the Corsair in 1938, and the prototype flew in 1940. So it really wasn’t that much later than the Hurricane, especially as far as pre-war technology is concerned. The advances made by the aviation industry once it was totally embroiled in the war are quite staggering. Hence, the Corsair was able to later benefit from that.

    in reply to: Cosford Wellington Colours? #1094144
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I do like it displayed in a “traditional” bomber paint job, reminds me of the old Airfix kit.

    Ahh, Mr. Cross! Memories indeed!

    in reply to: Aircraft Appearing In Films #1104645
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Lovely little Cessna 150 Aerobat in ‘The Mechanic” with Charles Bronson(1972)

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1108811
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I thought we were giggling because none of us knew Amelia Earhart was a boxer…

    in reply to: WW2 RAF aircraft – any ideas on type ? #1108814
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Maybe a Potez 63?

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1109793
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    MarGus

    Many thanks for the correction, yes, I was thinking of the very rare Ju86 at the Linkoping Museum amongst all the other rare exhibits. Well worth the visit to that Museum.

    It’s quite annoying when people hijack threads to discuss things such as classic aircraft…….

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1110753
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I simply wished, you understand, for Ms Swank to accompany me in order to discuss Amelia (of which she knows a good deal) and for her knowledge of and interest in aviation. Not for any other reason, you understand.

    I understand completely, Andy. However, I must confess that if it was me, while we were discussing Amelia, I would tend to gently steer the topic of conversation around to ‘Gee, why don’t you take all of your clothes off, Ms Swank”.

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1110894
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    I just googled her. Yes please, and sod the aircraft wrecks.

    [ATTACH]190923[/ATTACH]

    Oh alright then.

    in reply to: The wonderful thing about TIGHAR….. #1115212
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Ok class, first lesson today in infant level biology is to list five differences between people and turtles….

    Not as easy or straightforward as one might think. I went to a mate’s fancy dress party carrying a girl piggyback. He opened door and wanted to know why I wasn’t in costume. I said “I am. I’ve come as a turtle.” He said “well, who’s the girl on your back then?”

    I said “That’s Michelle…………..”

    in reply to: Aircrew Lynching #1129093
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    In WW1 a loss of 10 troops was viewed as nothing to get concerned about, 10,000 before lunch was just bad luck. Thankfully attitudes have changed.

    I think this is because any conflict anywhere in the world now is broadcast live to a television and internet-viewing public. There is no shortage of self-proclaimed experts to make comment, criticise and condemn the actions of others (in many ways this is a good thing!!)

    The world has changed the way it views war. Filmmakers now spare no expense in detailing the bloodshed, maiming and horrific death suffered by soldiers and civilians alike. Truth be told, I don’t believe any filmmaker would dare make a film glorifying war as was so popular decades ago.

    The end result of this is the general public are probably now more than ever ready to say “not to my son, you don’t”.

    in reply to: CORGI re-writes history. #1130376
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    Is this a Sidcot?

    I think that’s a Taylor suit. Bomber Command gunners’ issue.

    in reply to: CORGI re-writes history. #1131151
    Frazer Nash
    Participant

    My apologies for leaving the thread, but…….Sidcot suits (invented by Sidney Cotton) were quite a padded affair of kapok. From what I can see in my limited book collection, the white suits were a standard pre-war RAF issue.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 251 total)