dark light

andrei

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • andrei
    Participant

    Where did I say the US would bomb Cuba? I’m saying that in a shooting war they’d be conveniently stationed a couple hundred miles from both an F-15 base and an F-22 base. Not smart.

    There will be no shooting war between Russia and US. No, not now, maybe never. So sending Backfires to Cuba is exactly the same thing like sending an us army mission to Georgia. But the equivalent of arming equipping and training the georgian army with US support is sending russian soldiers and material to train iraqi insurgents. Or Iranian revolutionnary guards. What will the US do then ?

    andrei
    Participant

    Yeah right. The US will bomb Cuba ? For what reason ? With what mandate ? Nuclear war ? This is ridiculous. It is like saying that the presence of an us destroyer in the black sea makes it awfully easy for Russia to destroy it

    andrei
    Participant

    I don t see why people refuse to believe the evidence. Yes US trainers and US army was supporting the Georgian army. The georgian president may be excited or lunatic but there is no way that the 300 + american troops in Georgia including the 20 some active in the government would have ignored the georgian army assault built up. So it seems very probable that US forces might have been in the frontline and therefore killed or captured by the russians. The russian press has presented plenty of evidence of this. Putin has stated the obvious. It doesn t really change much the situation. It s even normal in the power game when you consider that the us navy is 50 km away from russian fleet in the black sea. So how come some people consider this to be russian propaganda ? Nobody imagines Putin the russian prime minister would lie about this. He may be hostile, maniac, imperialistic, whatever but he is not a comic. If he says that there is proof of us direct involvement in the georgian act there must be . It does not make the russian actions more or less legitimate. It is just logical

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2488266
    andrei
    Participant

    Well taking into account the pictures seen we can observe that the russian troops in Georgia were
    – mostly made of Abkhazian and Ossetian irregulars – seen using old tanks like t62
    = supported by chechen experienced batallions (like vostok), under the control of the GRU
    – at most 2 mechanised batallions of the regular army
    – VDV – paratroopers and spetznatz – a regiment probably
    – some artillery units
    – a lot of units from the ministry of emergency situation, which acts similarly to the french gendarmerie
    We are far from the organised structured force that some suppose was buing built up.
    The georgian defeat was obtained using these forces, not a massive armor push

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2488313
    andrei
    Participant

    Surely it would be child’s play for Russia to provide evidence of this “genocide”?

    FR 2 and Radio Canada have provided ample documentation in yesterday and today ‘s TV news journal about the destruction inflicted in SOuth Ossetia by the Georgians army (bombed hospitals, destroyed houses, etc). Was as always is terrible and it is ridiculous that CNN and other US manipulated channels cannot provide the minimum objectivity when covering civilian victims

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2489011
    andrei
    Participant

    Exactly how the existence of the F22 changed anything in Irak or Aghanistan until now ? Has it impressed Al Sadr ? The Talibans ? Has it protected anyone from anything ?
    How can a F22 based in Turkey stop a truck full of vostok irregulars to loote a city ? How can it impress a tank convoy blocking a georgian highway ? What difference does it make to Russian gunners manning check points ?
    Unless you are talking about bombing Russian troops, the F22 will make no difference. And bombing Russian troops is not on any one’s agenda .

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2489534
    andrei
    Participant

    Graphic photos

    Here some graphic photos from the conflict

    http://lsd-25.ru/2008/08/14/voyna-v-yuzhnoy-osetii-89-fotografiy-arkadiya-babchenko/

    Be careful, some are very… disturbing.
    From a military point of view
    – one can notice that most russian soldiers don t have armored vests as the georgians did
    – the individual equipment of the georgians seems to be very good. US stuff, LAVs and Javelins, Range rovers, and communication equipment, us trucks…
    – a lot of pictures of vostok batallion and chechen troops working with the russian. Old equipment, no individual protection but they must have been a tough bunch… a lot of experience.
    – the russians seemed to have had the upper hand with the use of artillery and heavy equipment… even if the georgians had very got ATGW, they probably got crushed by the mix of special forces and heavy armor

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2489589
    andrei
    Participant

    I still believe they are T64… T62 are kept in storage in the Russian army (around 4000).

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2489658
    andrei
    Participant

    What is that

    These tanks don t look like T90 or T80 to me… more like t64… What do you guys say ? Why would Russia use them ?

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2490438
    andrei
    Participant

    74 soldiers killed for Russia is quite a number. Let s say that 20 have died in the first day when the georgians attacked their basis. But the rest have been killed in combat.
    The fighting must have been intense. From what I understand from a strategic point of view, the russian air force has decimated the georgian air force, the VDV paratroopers raids have destroyed helicopters on the ground, the russian navy has sunked whatever they found in Poti and around, and the spetznats raids are still organised on a daily basis from the current russian army position to destroy georgian military basis around the country. It is far from over and it seems that the georgian army will be weakened also by abkhaz troops and other irregulars operating under the protection of russian air force and artillery (like the UCK was operating in Kosovo with NATO air support in 1999). Reading the russian newspapers ( i m not russian but I can read russian), the press is full of articles mentioning dead black soldiers with american passports found by russian troops

    in reply to: The Military Situation in Georgia, S.O. and Abkhazia #2491733
    andrei
    Participant

    Russia is sending 2 rogue special companies
    According to Russia Today, the 42d infantry division based in Grozny is sending two of its special rogue (volunteers) companies to Georgia. The Vostok and Zapad batallions are made of volunteers and famous for getting into racketting and gang battling chechen environment. You can google their name and find out in how many bad blood they have been involved. These are volunteers, cosack type troops, operated under the command of the GRU (army intelligence) but without the proper discipline of regular forces. This can mean that Russia wasn t really planning for this since their best available troops are in Grozny and made of volunteers. Second, it can also get messy since these troops (Vostok Zapad) are used to irregular warfare and mixing civilian with military targets. The only sure thing is that they have a lot of experience and are tough nuts to crack for anyone

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2491816
    andrei
    Participant

    It was just a quick answer to Guy and other folks who use only western sources to get a documentation on a conflict. It just seems to me that from a propaganda point of view, Russia has also learned (not only military), since the words and messages used are very similar to the ones used by the US : hitting terrorist hide outs, protecting peace keepers, eliminating threats to the on going peace keeping operations etc. It has taken 13 years for the US, since 1990 from Panama to the Gulf War and Bosnia interventions, Kosovo and the next war to improve their propaganda machine sustaining their military goals. Russia has learned this lesson

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2491843
    andrei
    Participant

    Yes, let s use cnn and fox news, they are much, much more credible. When the US is using a B2 to bomb a terrorist cave where goats hide in Afghanistan , all the fox news and cnn journalists are in awe, impressed by the american power and might. When Russia uses bombers to attack airports they are worried about excessive use of force

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2553912
    andrei
    Participant

    roaf budget for 2008

    Now the Romanian defence budget for 2008 has been approved, it is less han the army has expected and will be around 2.5 billions euros for 2008. Since a lot of this money will go for external missions (irak, afghanistan), there is no money left for purchasing new fighters. Hey, but that ‘s good news. The minister of finance said that the fighters will be paid for with a loan/lease from banks. Loan/lease with the banks means using a consultant to prepare the deal, and consultants are expensive but very effective because they ensure a smooth transfer of kick backs to the decision makers. BAE and the Typhoon seem in a better position today, because they have a long established track record of pay backs. And the Romanian politicians who know that have now a strong incentive to close the deal before the next elections in 2009

    in reply to: Portugal Take Over Baltic Air-Policing Mission #2553914
    andrei
    Participant

    Welcome portugal

    Now some pics from the ceremony of transfer of mission from the Romanian air force to the Portuguese air force. The Romanian Lancers (Mig 21 with improved avionics , HUD , helmet based fire target selection made by Elint etc) were armed with 2 magic 2 missiles and their standard load included two fuel tanks. Any ideea of what the Portuguese F16 will use ?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 55 total)