dark light

Paul

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Archiving records #1001056
    Paul
    Participant

    Thanks all for the starting points, I think the hard part will be the catalogue and ability to search for references.

    Paul.

    in reply to: Heads Up. BBC News today. Pantons announce Lancaster to fly #982426
    Paul
    Participant

    I wish the Patons good luck and it is grand to visit, see and smell “Just Jane” just after shes done an engine run! (much more alive than YAMS “Friday 13th”), however I must say that I think the money would be much better spent on the Hampden in their charge or recreating a Stirling, Wellington, Whitley etc. (Now that would be a museam to visit)!

    As a Yorkshireman proud of No4 and No6 (Canada) association with the Halifax it did nark that the BBC deliberately avoided saying the Halibag on two occaisions during the report. We on this forum are educated folk but to Joe Bloggs the Lancaster/Spitfire gets increasingly elevated to mythical status while the “other Btitish Bombers” just get written out of history by the likes of the BBC. “Grr”.

    in reply to: Heads Up. BBC News today. Pantons announce Lancaster to fly #984649
    Paul
    Participant

    They lost their elder brother in “another British bomber”…… What is so difficult about saying the word “Halifax”. Lets just let the BBC erase every British WWII aircraft from history except Spitfires and Lancasters.

    Cheers BBC.

    in reply to: Tony Agar #945244
    Paul
    Participant

    A speedy recovery sir.

    in reply to: Lanc repaint? #1064529
    Paul
    Participant

    Ok lets stir the pot a bit:

    I like the idea of coastal command and it got me thinking…

    Why a Lanc scheme! There were other bombers than just Lancasters you know. PA474 is supposed to be a memorial to ALL Bomber Command…. There were many interesting schemes painted onto Halibags, Stirlings, Wellingtons, Whitleys etc.

    How about “Excalibur” LK-E of 578 squadron… The mount of Cyril Barton the only Halifax VC.

    It may show Joe Public that there were other bombers than just the lancs…. Or will that be sacrilege to the Lancaphiles!

    Just a thought.

    Paul.

    http://578squadron.org.uk/operations/easy.jpg

    in reply to: Bad designs #1067176
    Paul
    Participant

    Have you ever tried to move about the confines of an a/c wearing a seat-type ‘chute’…? 😮 As far as I’m aware, RAF Bomber pilots all normally wore a Seat-Type ‘chute when flying British-built a/c. Their seats were normally ‘bucket-type’ to accomodate the Irvin. Other crew members simply did not have the space, or required greater mobility, especially gunners. I’m sure there may have been some variations however, such as US bombers such as the Liberator. 🙂

    Point taken Snoopy… Bomber pilots had chest type chute just like the rest of the crew. Usually stowed behind or below the pilots seat…. Not an easy place to get to while trying to maintain control of a crashing bomber…. From my own experiences my uncle was an F/E, he stayed to clip on the pilots chute and pushed him out of the exit but didn’t get out himself.

    in reply to: Bad designs #1067240
    Paul
    Participant

    I suppose this counts as a design fault as it could have been easily sorted out. I never really understood why WWII bomber crew did not have fighter pilot type permanant chutes. We lost a hell of a lot of aircrew having to find and clip on their chutes.

    In 1944 some bomber pilots were issued with seat type chutes as a trial. There are several accounts of them saying they only survived because they had their chutes on them…. Not stowed away out of reach requiring the flight engineer to help find it, clip it on, while having to sort his own chute and make his escape.

    in reply to: Ever wondered what a bomber stream sounded like? #949937
    Paul
    Participant

    Excellent thought provoking sound.

    I once asked my mother what the sound was like… She hated it and said she didn’t want to think about it… She lost her brother on Halifaxes. It must have been hard to hear the sound night after night.

    in reply to: RAF Burn Gliding Club #949944
    Paul
    Participant

    This is really good news as Burn Gliding Club look after what is left of the old airfield and keep it alive, and are proud of their heritage. It is sad that it is only for three years though. Perhaps the local council still have plans to turn it into some anonymous industrial estate or something in years to come. Which would be a great shame. It is really fitting that the gliders circle peacfully where once the Halifaxes roared.

    http://www.burnglidingclub.co.uk/

    http://578squadron.org.uk/

    in reply to: Ten best-looking British aircraft #964013
    Paul
    Participant

    Shoulda gone to specsavers :);):D

    I don’t know what you mean.
    Shes a beaut!
    No Lanc could look this good! (I know its a MkIX but looks damn good in all ali).

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/wallpapers/1946_1949/halifaxc8800.jpg

    in reply to: Bomber Command Documentary – 3 July #969360
    Paul
    Participant

    Couldnt help but be moved at the very end when they focused purely on the chaps, name , rank ,number of ops etc. and without sounding er, childish or ‘Boys Own’ I couldnt help think that if you gave those chaps a serviceable Lanc or a Halifax today what would be the chances of them getting it off the deck these days , do a circuit or two? I appreciate that after seventy odd years they might be a bit out of practice, But my money is that theyd soon have it all flooding back!. well thats my fantasy of the day satisfied. Well done on a fabulous programme!

    I know its not a Lanc or Halifax but what about “Project propellor”. Light aircraft folk give flights to aircrew veterans…. I am sure some of the pilots are given the controls!

    http://www.projectpropeller.co.uk/

    in reply to: Blimey I wouldn't want to get on this guys bad side #1017369
    Paul
    Participant

    Peterson was stating that the bomber crews were bailing out over the target area! What chance had they landing amongst hostile locals?

    Nasty business total war, hopefully we’ve learned the lessons never to do it again thanks to the sacrifices of those seventy years ago.

    in reply to: Halifax squadrons #1021743
    Paul
    Participant

    Another one of my stupid questions, entering outside my familiar and safe haven of 331 and 332 squadron.

    Anyone care to mention a typical Halifax bomber squadron based in Lincolnshire in 1943?

    Can I ask a “stupid question” back? before we start a long list.

    The “typical Halifax bomber squadrons” were 4 & 6 Groups based up North in Gods own County; Yorkshire and Teeside not Lincolnshire.

    The Halifax being an adaptable kite did much more than typical bombing, SOE stuff, glider towing, coastal command, HCU, electronic countermeasures etc…. Some based in Lincolnshire, but these are not the “typical bomber squadrons”.

    in reply to: Halifax squadrons #1031123
    Paul
    Participant

    Another one of my stupid questions, entering outside my familiar and safe haven of 331 and 332 squadron.

    Anyone care to mention a typical Halifax bomber squadron based in Lincolnshire in 1943?

    Can I ask a “stupid question” back? before we start a long list.

    The “typical Halifax bomber squadrons” were 4 & 6 Groups based up North in Gods own County; Yorkshire and Teeside not Lincolnshire.

    The Halifax being an adaptable kite did much more than typical bombing, SOE stuff, glider towing, coastal command, HCU, electronic countermeasures etc…. Some based in Lincolnshire, but these are not the “typical bomber squadrons”.

    in reply to: Hampden at Langley B.C #1050273
    Paul
    Participant

    A lot of it is non original, but as such a unique airframe it does deserve to be undercover and I’ve often wondered why nobody has shown more interest in the beast.

    I dare say the folk at Langley are doing the best they can.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 195 total)