Hi, Lothar:
You confused me by following words
As to engine relights, there was no limitation on engine RPM on the live engine for relighting either engine but common sense dictated that it would have been unwise to be at 100%. Anyhow the Lightning flew very happily on one so rarely the need to be at 100%, indeed whole sorties after take-off have been flown single engine. The top engine, by the way, was designated No 2 but no difference except that the hydraulics for the brake chute doors only operated off the no 1.
I did some research, and I found the air flow passed inlet of Lightning certainly would reach the down engine first. Additionally, the top engine which gets much more curved air pipeline to transfer the airflow to has almost illogical to steal air flow from buttom engine, especially while the No1 engine during max. power.
Would you mind enlighten me with more visual explaination?
Yes, Lothar, it is helps indeed.
According to the photo you contributed, it seems that rocket bay could not be fitted with missile launch station simultaneously, am I right?
On the Lightning the stagger did not always provide ‘consistency for airflow’. When taxiing, the No 2 engine (top) was kept at 65% to keep the electrics on line with the No 1 at idle. On take off you had to bring the No 1 up to match No 2 before selecting full power otherwise the No 2 would ‘steal’ all the intake air which would lead to a very slow spool up of no 1. It was quite common to see inexperienced pilots launching off down the runway with the top engine in reheat and the bottom still trying to accelerate to 100%
This description gives me vivid image how the powerplant works on Lightning. Now I am wondering if the upper engine (its 1# engine I guess) failed or needs restart in any case, would it be waiting untill the 2# engine down its air flow or you could tell me even 2# engine was staying at maximum speed, the 1# engine were able to restart still?
Sorry Arch:
It is my mistake to call the RF-84F thunderstreak, you are absolutely right, it is called Thunderflash. And your link is helpful indeed.
Furthermore, may I ask its turn rate? The initial climb rate has been found, which slightly lower than F-84F Thunderstreak, perhaps because of smaller T/W rate due to its incremental weight added by reconnaissance instrument in nose.
What’s this enlarged bump for?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224645[/ATTACH]
The canopy frame is back to J-20?
No Female Aviator in Helicopter?
you must excuse Emily, she doesn’t know the difference between operational aircraft and test models, or even variants between them.
Is she a female?
BTW, there is a big difference between wartime and peacetime loads. Why would anyone load eight missiles worth $6mil on a peacetime training mission is beyond me.
Exactly!
I am looking for some videos which show F-16 or F-15 was full loading for their mission at wartime, or threw weapons while they were full loaded. Statical image won’t stop this argument between Emile and J-31 I am afraid.
I am also interested in why Emile wouldn’t touch J-10 since he’d revealed that Chinese he is.:cool:
The SMT(Singel seater) has what? 5700kg int fuel?
Russian announced 5100~5400kg for early prototype of MiG-29M2 MRCA which even was capable to carry missiles @ wing tip, just like F-18. But we have no idea where does your 5700kg come from.
For airframe not money 😀
Where is our expert of length?
This scale may be reasonable
The Y-20 is really such big? One told me that only A400M size alike.
What’s kind of maneuver done by F-22 @ around 01:30 in this video?