Any hypothesis as to why the shadow has engulfed the hose?

Any theories about those beautiful photographs taken of the LM after it detached from Eagle,
through the little window?

Sticking to the discrepancies in the photos is a better course of discussion, than reasoning as to
why?

Lets see where we go with these photos, because I have 3 amazing pics, that boggles the mind.
Even those who think the idea of this thing being fake is absurd, will be lost for word.

Incidentally, I forgot to mention these pics were from NASA’s own, archived, web site. Here is the link http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

I think even the most hardened “anti SSS” readers should find these 2 pics interesting, and
questionable. Putting aside from the fact, like all other pictures, the Moon appears to be a
planetary body only 200 feet in diameter; So in any direction the background becomes abruptly
pitch black after about 100 feet. (I apologise to my English Professor for the use of Semicolon)
^_^

And, putting aside the, already fakery, highly discussed in many other circles. Which is the clear
superimposing of the Hand-Held Radio looking thing in the foreground on the fake picture,
being in front of the “Crosshair”. Because the film came with the crosshairs, so every object has
to be “behind” them. There are other fakeries here, but for now, how about the following?

Pay attention to the parallel white hoses extending down from the LM to the ground. Going
sideways for about 1 metre, and then going back up. This hose is attached to that landing strut
and extends at an angle to the camera. That is why the shadow it depicts, supposedly, is much
closer to each other than the actual distance between the hoses. However, the shadow
from the landing pod it is attached to this runs over the white hose, and as well,
the shadow from the other landing pod at the back.

How in the hell can that be?

It is because the picture is faked, and the shadows were added, or deleted, to make up for the
“multiple” light source effect.

If you still don’t accept the mistake, which is not surprising, take a look at the other pic, which is
a closer-up. The guy who drew the shadows totally messed up the depiction of the “hose”
shadow here. Some part of it that was placed behind the shadow of the strut are now in front of
it, as they should have been. And, some still are not. He also forgot to add a shadow for that
3foot high rode one the left side and right next to the landing pod.

I wish I knew how to place each pic after the corresponding paragraph. It would make more sense.

Here are a few interesting points, worthy of scrutiny. Keep in mind, these are not tangible arguments. Those will come later.

– The lander has a pressurised cabin volume of 235 cubic feet. That is roughly 6.17 x 6.17 x 6.17
feet. Get up from your computer and put your foot in front of the other 6 times. That is about 6
feet. I have also attached a pic from the inside of the so-called Lander. Is there anybody out there
that would really believe 2 Astronauts with their pressurised suits and backpack could do
anything but stand against the bulkheads immobile. Either I am missing something, or NASA
has, once again, mislabeled this pic.

– This one is just great. The pic is supposed to be of the LM being visually inspected after
undocking from the Orbiter, orbiting the Moon. I love the way the US flag AND the word United
States is visible in this “picture perfect” pic. Personally I think showing national pride in a show
piece like this is fine and dandy. But, this pic is so fake that it defies discussion.

– This pic is of the LM while still in production. Notice the size and the door shape. The size just
doesn’t look big enough to hold even a couple of large dogs. And, notice the square door shape
for later references.

– Once again, the work in progress on the LM. Notice the circular door shape. I know it means
there were 2 of these LMs, but has NASA admitted to owning 2? Keep in mind these were both
Apollo 11s.

– I just wish I knew how you could put 2 fully suited Astronauts in there.

– In this fabulous and perfect pic, Armstrong (the best photographer in the world) has taken a pic
of Aldrin using his chest-mounted, no-view-finder camera. I really find it obvious that this pic is
studio quality. This is supposed to be the “shady” side of the LM, and yet, you can see everything
as if there are several reflectors bouncing the light without creating shadows. Just look at the 2
larger section of the gold foil. It is reflecting something high up. And, this is just a few of the
many things that just does not jive. I love the way the US flag or the word United States is
showing perfectly, as usual. As if saying “in your face you Soviet Commies”.

– This is yet another picture perfect…..well, picture. I wonder how long it was before Buzz came
down after Neil (hey, what happened to “I” before “E” except after “C” !?) had? There are so
many foot prints around. Once again, the US flag is “in your face Commies”.

– Okay, this one is very interesting. It is another one of the “inspection” shots. It is absolutely
perfect picture of the LM suspended from the ceiling. The reason the pic is small, is because
when you click on the thumbnail of this fabulous picture, you get a different pic which is NOT
this one and is also fuzzy ???

– The United States logo is just sooooo perfect here. Another one for the Soviets. Now, could
somebody tell me why in this picture, of the shade-side of the LM, the reflection is at the top of
the Gold Foil?? So much for the ground reflection theory, huh.

More proof the Moon Landings were fake, 1. NASA claims that the LM didn’t cause a “CRATER” when taking off because on the Moon they (The LM/Astronuts) are in a “Vaccum” so the blast would go “OUTWARD” and not “Downward”, well if thats NASA’s explaination, WHY is it when the LM from the First Apollo Landing “Apollo 11” is coming close to the surface when it was landing you can see with the naked eye the moon SURFACE being blown away from the “supposed” Rocket booster??? 2. What was the speed that the Moon car was traveling at? Why is it at the Houston Space Station in TEXAS you can see the original suit and LM and you can clearly see the space suit could not fit threw the LM’s door?????????????

Good observation “Clear War”. There are just too many inconsistencies in the material
provided by NASA as the proof of their 6 “landings”.

I am deducting, from what I have learnt, that the Apollo 11 mission, aside from the liftoff and
orbiting the Earth, was 100% designed to fool the planet (mostly the “evil” Soviets), and make
up for the humiliation of being defeated in the race to sent a human into space AND the defeat
in placing the 1st satellite into orbit.

I think in at least one of the subsequent missions they managed to orbit the Moon. It seems they
tried, but the technology to land just was not there, and still isn’t.

I believe they used each mission to learn how to actually do land on the Moon. But because they
just couldn’t do it, the lie got bigger and bigger, and, the fabrication of the evidence of the
“landings” became more routine. That is why simple mistakes where more prevalent in the
following “missions”. Such as using the same backdrop, of mountains, for 2 different missions.
Or, forgetting to put the Lander back where it was supposed to be for the photo shoot.

It is so amusing that NASA even screwed up the measurement of the hatch opening and the
Astro-nots wearing their suits can’t even fit through it !!!!

SSS-666.

As far as I can see with all this debate, whether the whole thing was a hoax or not, is simply this…..

The majority of people don’t care either way. People are in stressful situations regarding their work or their interpersonal relationships, they have family members who are ill, they are facing debt or some large forthcoming expense, the cat’s got to go to the vets, the kids need money for a school field trip. All of these things contribute to pushing the (alleged) moon landings way down our list of everyday priorities.

Look at it this way.

1. The moon landings happened.

2. The moon landings were staged.

Whichever happened, it has little or no impact on our daily lives today other than to create a mildly interesting diversion when the topic comes up for debate on fora such as this.

Personally, I believe they did take place. Were they part of a conspiracy to distract American public attention from the increasing losses sustained in Vietnam? Who knows? Were they expected to give us some huge technological advancement which would enhance the future of mankind? What are those benefits?

Perhaps it would have been better if the returning Astronauts had in fact landed on the grassy knoll so the two great conspiracy theories could have been rolled into one.

What it really boils down to is did it really happen or not? And more importantly, do I care?

Regards,

kev35

Thanx for the civilised post.

I think you established that you don’t care about this post. Fair enough.

What do you care about, to talk in this forum?

I have been reading this post, which I find quite comical, I did at one time agree with your conspiracy theories, and that the moon landings were indeed fake. However when i reached Year 2, i had my first Physics lesson. I remember watching the Discovery channel about this matter, which made convincing arguments. For example the reason why there is no stars, is caused by the exposure of the camera/eye, if you look up at the sky with a lampost of some sort above you, you cannot see the stars as the eyes react to the amount of light being focused on the retina. As for the flag, I remind you the moon has no atmosphere and minimal gravity. Therefore if they flag had been knocked, e.g when placing the flag into the moons surface, there would be no resistance to the motion and minimal gravity to stop the flag waving. To be honest I find these claims to be rather hilarious, and you should save your breath for blowing up your girlfriend/boyfriend.
Please may I refer you to this site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_Landing_Faked
Best of luck with it all,
Jon

I was about to take your post seriously, and from a mature person. Then I read your insult. Well, so much for that.

AND

Why isn’t this ignore option not working?