dark light

SSS-666

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 235 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936134
    SSS-666
    Participant

    I have been reading this post, which I find quite comical, I did at one time agree with your conspiracy theories, and that the moon landings were indeed fake. However when i reached Year 2, i had my first Physics lesson. I remember watching the Discovery channel about this matter, which made convincing arguments. For example the reason why there is no stars, is caused by the exposure of the camera/eye, if you look up at the sky with a lampost of some sort above you, you cannot see the stars as the eyes react to the amount of light being focused on the retina. As for the flag, I remind you the moon has no atmosphere and minimal gravity. Therefore if they flag had been knocked, e.g when placing the flag into the moons surface, there would be no resistance to the motion and minimal gravity to stop the flag waving. To be honest I find these claims to be rather hilarious, and you should save your breath for blowing up your girlfriend/boyfriend.
    Please may I refer you to this site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_Landing_Faked
    Best of luck with it all,
    Jon

    I was about to take your post seriously, and from a mature person. Then I read your insult. Well, so much for that.

    AND

    Why isn’t this ignore option not working?

    in reply to: General Discussion #332619
    SSS-666
    Participant

    BEHAVE GENTLEMEN, please we have a perfect oppertunity to display we can deal all issues rationally without getting personel, NAAAAAAAAAH no fun in tht , flare up rulzzzz DUDE. Let me get a coke n popcorns its gona get intresting.

    That’s the spirit.

    I admit, I lost my cool. I was trying so hard to stay on the topic. But, the cheap shots and sarcasm kept coming, and I got suckered into it. My bad. However, I found, and made use of, the “ignore” option.

    So, where was I???

    Lets see, I was talking about the fraud NASA has managed to keep under wraps for 40, or so, years. And, the shame it will bring to a country that has recently brought enough shame to its reputation that it will take decades to recover. If ever.

    We were talking about “flag waving,” “foot steps” “multiple light sources, ” “bad videos” and “great, studio quality photos”.

    There was a deadlock on the Flag thingy, or the foot steps. I attempted to move the discussion along by switching to the anomalies present in mountains and rocks, but was accused of “changing the rules”. So……….

    How does lack of air contribute to a flag continuing to wave?
    How can an Astro-not weighing 30 pounds make perfect foot steps in a medium void of any moisture or air?
    AND
    Why is it that there are the same mountains showing up in 2 different missions, at different landing sites?
    Why does the Lander disappear from photos taken in the same mission?

    Finally, why is it not so obvious NASA, and the US Government faked the landings. And, the prestige with its associated respect is undeserved.

    Isn’t there somebody out there who could fund a competition to pay $1,000,000, or so, to anybody who can take a picture of the “landing sites” and the “equipment” left at those sites??? I am certain that money will never be needed.

    Personally, I am off to find a backyard telescope, much much more powerful than my current one, which can take pics just close enough to see the surface.

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936168
    SSS-666
    Participant

    BEHAVE GENTLEMEN, please we have a perfect oppertunity to display we can deal all issues rationally without getting personel, NAAAAAAAAAH no fun in tht , flare up rulzzzz DUDE. Let me get a coke n popcorns its gona get intresting.

    That’s the spirit.

    I admit, I lost my cool. I was trying so hard to stay on the topic. But, the cheap shots and sarcasm kept coming, and I got suckered into it. My bad. However, I found, and made use of, the “ignore” option.

    So, where was I???

    Lets see, I was talking about the fraud NASA has managed to keep under wraps for 40, or so, years. And, the shame it will bring to a country that has recently brought enough shame to its reputation that it will take decades to recover. If ever.

    We were talking about “flag waving,” “foot steps” “multiple light sources, ” “bad videos” and “great, studio quality photos”.

    There was a deadlock on the Flag thingy, or the foot steps. I attempted to move the discussion along by switching to the anomalies present in mountains and rocks, but was accused of “changing the rules”. So……….

    How does lack of air contribute to a flag continuing to wave?
    How can an Astro-not weighing 30 pounds make perfect foot steps in a medium void of any moisture or air?
    AND
    Why is it that there are the same mountains showing up in 2 different missions, at different landing sites?
    Why does the Lander disappear from photos taken in the same mission?

    Finally, why is it not so obvious NASA, and the US Government faked the landings. And, the prestige with its associated respect is undeserved.

    Isn’t there somebody out there who could fund a competition to pay $1,000,000, or so, to anybody who can take a picture of the “landing sites” and the “equipment” left at those sites??? I am certain that money will never be needed.

    Personally, I am off to find a backyard telescope, much much more powerful than my current one, which can take pics just close enough to see the surface.

    in reply to: General Discussion #332630
    SSS-666
    Participant

    I wonder if there’s an IGNORE this dribbling idiot with his silly little conspiracy theories button…

    There seem to be quite a few of these around today…

    Don’t make me tell your daddy. He will cut off your allowance, if you misbehave.

    Now, go and leave this to the grown ups.

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936175
    SSS-666
    Participant

    I wonder if there’s an IGNORE this dribbling idiot with his silly little conspiracy theories button…

    There seem to be quite a few of these around today…

    Don’t make me tell your daddy. He will cut off your allowance, if you misbehave.

    Now, go and leave this to the grown ups.

    in reply to: General Discussion #332639
    SSS-666
    Participant

    You can have a free grassy knoll aswell if you want? It’s just I won’t be able to tell you what colour it is!

    (I don’t think I’ve ever been called a dweeb before – result! 😉 )

    (Oh, what a shame – SSS-666 has removed his post where he called us dweebs – but it’s still a result for me! :p )

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE this S.O.*. button???

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936187
    SSS-666
    Participant

    You can have a free grassy knoll aswell if you want? It’s just I won’t be able to tell you what colour it is!

    (I don’t think I’ve ever been called a dweeb before – result! 😉 )

    (Oh, what a shame – SSS-666 has removed his post where he called us dweebs – but it’s still a result for me! :p )

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE this S.O.*. button???

    in reply to: General Discussion #332640
    SSS-666
    Participant

    Well said!

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE this S.O.*. button???

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936190
    SSS-666
    Participant

    Well said!

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE this S.O.*. button???

    in reply to: General Discussion #332642
    SSS-666
    Participant

    According to your profile you are only 14 years old!

    Shouldn’t you be in school?

    I keep putting 1906, but it keeps resetting itself to 1992. So, I guess I settle for 1916.

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE option???

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936192
    SSS-666
    Participant

    According to your profile you are only 14 years old!

    Shouldn’t you be in school?

    I keep putting 1906, but it keeps resetting itself to 1992. So, I guess I settle for 1916.

    I wonder if there is an IGNORE option???

    in reply to: General Discussion #332949
    SSS-666
    Participant

    My post was removed not by me, but by the powers be. Yet, yours remain.

    From your barrage of piteous posts, it is clear that the attempt is to divert attention from the
    message to the messenger. And, it is working, to a point.

    Over 1200 people have read these posts, and they can see the level of your intellect. Your posts
    are childish and pathetic. How I wish there were more grownups here. It seems at least one of
    you puts on checkered skirts.

    I think a lot of readers see the prestige of being the 1st, and the only, country to set foot on the
    Moon was faked and NASA is a fraud, along with all those Astro-nots pretending to be heros for
    all those years. The sarcasm and personal attacks is an indication of trying to mask the shame
    which comes with that knowledge. Clearly this rather pitiful attempt to fool the entire planet is
    failing.

    The photos can depict 100% picture perfect images of the US flag or the word United States of
    America, where everything else is dark. But, as the saying goes, you can fool some of the people
    some of the times…………. The reality is that there has only been very little decent attempts to
    prove this thread wrong. Only this constant self-righteousness and sarcasm. Which actually is
    not very surprising, considering the patrons. Then you people wonder why you are disliked by
    the entire planet?

    Waiting for the rest of us to continue this discussion.

    in reply to: The second biggest hoax of the last century #1936299
    SSS-666
    Participant

    My post was removed not by me, but by the powers be. Yet, yours remain.

    From your barrage of piteous posts, it is clear that the attempt is to divert attention from the
    message to the messenger. And, it is working, to a point.

    Over 1200 people have read these posts, and they can see the level of your intellect. Your posts
    are childish and pathetic. How I wish there were more grownups here. It seems at least one of
    you puts on checkered skirts.

    I think a lot of readers see the prestige of being the 1st, and the only, country to set foot on the
    Moon was faked and NASA is a fraud, along with all those Astro-nots pretending to be heros for
    all those years. The sarcasm and personal attacks is an indication of trying to mask the shame
    which comes with that knowledge. Clearly this rather pitiful attempt to fool the entire planet is
    failing.

    The photos can depict 100% picture perfect images of the US flag or the word United States of
    America, where everything else is dark. But, as the saying goes, you can fool some of the people
    some of the times…………. The reality is that there has only been very little decent attempts to
    prove this thread wrong. Only this constant self-righteousness and sarcasm. Which actually is
    not very surprising, considering the patrons. Then you people wonder why you are disliked by
    the entire planet?

    Waiting for the rest of us to continue this discussion.

    in reply to: The Advantage of a Mini Sub #2059063
    SSS-666
    Participant

    Mini subs ( as opposed to midget subs or smaller) are cheaper to make, can be made quieter and more manouverable in restricted waters and add difficult targets for the enemy.
    With fuel cell technology and a couple of decent torpedos they could be very effective, but they would not exactly be cheap. Decent sonar and modern propulsion (ie mini nuke or fuel cell) are not cheap.

    They would certainly add flexibility to a naval force… even if they are just used for covertly laying mines, or attaking from unexpected directions.

    With today’s tech aren’t we able to employ transparent materials in a Mini Sub? I mean in a
    shallow body of water like the Persian Gulf, and with defensive intentions only (I mean not
    having to go around the planet for World Domination) wouldn’t having a Mini Sub with transparent top
    and a couple of torpedos be the most effective counter attack?

    Considering the use of composites, are the Sub Hunters using something like MAD still be able
    to see Sub of that size? Even so, wouldn’t a Sub the size of a Great White be able to just sit at the bottom
    and stalk the CVN or the Nuclear Sub for the order to be given?

    And, is there a weapon that can be fired by one of these Subs, that can bring down a CVN with
    one shot?

    in reply to: General Discussion #332972
    SSS-666
    Participant

    A teapot, perchance? :D:D:D
    I have not. I don’t think you fully understand the way that gravity works, though.

    The small force of lunar gravity would be acting with equal force on both the flag and the pole, the resulting downward force adding slightly to the friction on the joint between the two.

    You may recall that I mentioned friction.

    I notice you don’t argue the point about the lack of air….. I wonder why? :rolleyes:

    Or a carpet ^_^

    I truly don’t know what you are getting at with the gravity and the flag. And, I think there are
    other areas that do not involve physics, chemistry or any other science, but only observation. The
    academic stuff is not going anywhere. I would love to know why the anomalies in the photos and
    the videos exist. Just a quick note that ” woops there was a mixup in the photos is not going to
    cut it”.

    What is the argument about the lack of air???

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 235 total)