T/S-Darter integration with Gripen’s radar is probably just a question of time.
Interesting point is dat other countries have already started showing an interest in the machine…and any extra units sold would help to keep the tab on price. The cheaper it is, the more attractive it would prove to be many of those who cant wither afford sophisticated (and expensive) platforms or cant get them cos of snactions etc.
If u put together all recent interviews of PAF’s ACM, its quite clear that while PAF wants a western aircraft (mature technology) to meet its current hi tech needs, J-10 (more advannced versions) would have come into the equation in future (when the tech would have been matured). However, latest interview suggests that PAF is finding it very difficult to get a western supplier (mainly political reasons) and J-10 is the alternativ-although not mature it’d b better than anything currently in PAF’s inventory including future purcages of JF-17. PAF’s deputy chief of ops said that J-10 is available…so unless its a pressure tactic, it simply means it is available.
Few months back, AFM published a small news report about MKI, according to which assembly was likely to start by Dec 2004 while first MKI would make is first flight towards the end of 2007.
According to recent reports, SU-35 and Gripen r running head to head (recommendations forwarded to govt), though SU-35 enjoys a little more advantage due to other stuff that russians have offered. M2K-5 and F-16 r in 3rd and 4th place, respectively.
Russian comments about better J-11 finish in comparison with SU-27 r an indicator of improving chinese aviation industry.
I remember reading an article in a russian newspaper (probably Moscow Times???) published after a russian airshwow last year. It simply said that money matters a lot. Money purchases advanced technologies and expertise. The author was of the view (and i agree with him) dat the gap between west and russia is increasing by the day as Russia simply cannot afford to feed money into it defence industry.
PS. OTOH, i believe that gap between china and russia is narrowing by the day.
A simple question.
The inside of FC-1 intake seems rather curvy. Does anyone know if the rontal face of the engine can be seen (or not) if one is jsut standing in front of the intake???
i think the PAF will go for either the J10 or a western type, which type could is open to specualtion. wouldnt the PAF be better going for one type rather than 2? it would have more fleet standardisation and still have a good jet. the longer any future delivery of F-16 is delayed or any other jet, say the Mirage 2000, the less in service time they have due to the advancement of technology. id say the PAF will get the J10 due to it being a younger design with more potential. as an example we all know it is decades younger than the F-16. and of similar performance.
ACM’s interview indicates that PAF would indeed go for only one type…either j-10 or western.
Ideally they want a western hi tech fighter (and more advanced versions of J-10 in future), but if the option is not available they would go for current J-10 as their hi tech fighter.
Squadron nos. increase is for the coming few years and not later. 2020 is long long time from now.
Well 70 oldest mig-21 will go by next year. By 2010, u can expect that other older versions of Mig-21s (except Bison) and Mig-23 would have also gone. Thats around 200+ aircrafts. Can u imagine 200+ new fighters joining IAF by 2010? The numbers dont add even if u add hawk to the list.
the way things r going, UK may indeed end up cancelling the last batch.
By 2010? no way. the plan is to have an increased squadron strenght by 2015-2020 period. by 2010 this cannot be achived since there is no chance of having 220 LCAs in active service by then. 190MKIs, 220LCAs, 125M2K5s and yes you will have a increased squadron strenght. thats 535 new aircraft. plus an additional new gen aircraft should also be expected by then. but to counteract this Bisons and Jags will go out of service.
As i said before, the numbers dont make sense.
According to BR, IAF at present has about 680 combat aircrafts (excluding those in storage or attrition reserves) in about 40ish squadrons.
By 2020, bisons, jags, Mig-27s r bount to be retired by then. Even if IAF is operating 220 LCA, 190 MKI, 180 Mk-5s (if the deal goes through and even the present fleet is upgraded), 60 SMT (if Mig-29 fleet is upgraded) and 50 5th gen aircraft, dat only makes up 700 aircraft (once agai 40ish squadrons) and no attritions reserves r taken from this fleet.
PS. Is it true that IAF has a 1.2:1 pilot to aircraft ratio at present?
Last i heard, BAE was pushing saudis to buy 50 typhoons in a deal worth over around $4.5, which also including upgrading their existing tornadoes. Wot comes of it, i guess would depend on internal saudi situation and oil prices as well as saudi-US relations in future.
sharmaji
The IAF is actually intending to increase the number of squadrons, it also needs to retire certain strike acs such as the MiG-23s and hence the Mirages come in the picture, the IAF MiG-29s will not serve beyound 2015-18 me thinks. The IAF will eventually operate a su-30/LCA/Mirage/Pak-FA or MCA mix with the MiG-27s retiring by 2020 I think.
Its the increment in number of squadrons that i have never been able to understand.
How can IAF increase the number of fighter squadrons, if by 2010 it has retired all Mig-23s and old models of Mig-21s??? U cant increase that unless u r replacing every fighter on 1:1 basis and adding more.
Almost impossible for a totally soveriegn iraqi govt…unless of course USAF personnel r operating these.
There is no way that iraqis can afford all this (not just purcahses but running costs) when they owe billions to other countries. OTOH, US is likely to stay in Iraq for yrs to come (if things get better), and Iraq doesnt even need an AF of its own as there will b plenty of american bases there.