dark light

vikasrehman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 1,386 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697161
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    The stress of all IAF exercises with foreign countries has been BVR which is obviously a big advantage when you have a Phalcon as well, why get closer to the enemy? The R-77,27 etc combo will be used, tis dangerious to dogfight especially when you didn’t really have to.

    Well the problem is that as soon as MKI pilots turns on his/her radar to guide R-27 or R-77, the enemy’s pilot’s RWR would start screaming giving enemy some options. πŸ™
    I think u’d agree with me when i say that any BVR missile is extremely unlikely to b fired at max range, as enemy fighter can easily turn away and outrange it…and most fighter pilots would wait till they can within the effective range to increase the chances of the kill. By this time, the enemy may b well aware of MKI’s position (GCI is likely to provide a lot of help and AWACS can b truly God’s blessing) and things over hostile territory can get very nasty indeed.

    PS. In any pak-ind scenarion, air supremacy would come at a very considerable price…in forseeable future. πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697168
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    the MKI has a rather large RCS like all flankers. but that wouldnt matter one bit. especially when 4 MKIs come hunting datalinked to a phalcon.

    So would these MKI also use AWACS’s radar to guide their formiddable R-27/R-77? Or would the Awacs guide them to WVR of adversary where they can use their R-73/HMS combo…over a hostile territory?

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697170
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    This forum is probably unique in the sense that there is so much about FC-1 and stealth. :rolleyes:
    I think that the recent statement by the project director dat…during FC-1’s R&D stealth was not a requirement but the issue was not completely ignored…should somewhat clarify this issue.
    In my opinion, if FC-1’s frontal RCS is somewhat smaller than early model F-16s, dat would b a major achievement. That said, i wonder wot would b the frontal RCS of MKI (its main adversary in ind-pak scenario) when its fully loaded. Would it b in F-16 fighter class or F-15???

    in reply to: which is cheaper, Mirage 2000Mk5 or Gripen? #2697172
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    I think its difficult to attach a specific price to any fighter, since there r various factors which determine the unit price. For any buyer, its usually the number of purchased units that detrmines the price…and greater the number lower the unit price. On top of that extra goodies, i.e. tot/weapons/maintenance facilities etc increase the overall price even further. For example, UAE paid around $3.2 billion for first set of 30 or so mirages, while they r paying comparatively less for the next set…since all the facilites r already there. That said, russian/chinese stuff is usually cheaper than western stuff.

    As for gripen and M2K, i’d assume that the former would cost considerably less than the latter…since empty weight is also a big factor in unit price.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697510
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    PLA

    Unless im mistaken, Avionics r generally about a third of the overall unit price. That said, i think one cant say at present wot avionics PLAAF fighters (if confirmed) will take. J-7G is an example…which is probably using either licence produced Grifo-7PG or something similar…right???

    in reply to: Aviation Art #2697512
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Golden dragon

    That was a good one. πŸ™‚
    In future, with even better high off bore sight missile combined with helmets…will make life very difficult for any pilot in any aircraft.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697514
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    If this news of PLAAF order is officially confirmed, it’ll probably be THE SINGLE MOST SIGNIFICANT news since its maiden flight. It can bring down the unit price considerbaly, which is wot most developing countries r interested in…price/performance ratio. Additionally more money the sales can generate, greater the chances for further R&D and upgrades in future.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697565
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Another pakistani source confirming that china indeed has already placed an order for FC-1.

    http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/Apr-2004/17/main/top5.asp
    The serial production of the aircraft will start in 2007 and China has already placed order for a large number of aircrafts, Chief Project Director of JF-17, Air Vice Marshal Shahid Lateef told journalists. In addition to China, other regional countries are also interested in buying this aircraft, which carries a one fourth price tag as compared to its other contemporaries but is far better in efficiency and fuel consumption. 😎

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697570
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Although i only rely on babelfish when it comes to chinese language articles, my understanding regarding that 1000 figure is dat project director was referring to its possible potential. In my personal opinion, if FC-1 can sell only half as much (500 units) that would b a great success indeed.

    Crobato is absolutely right when he says that PLAAF r keeping all their options and taking their time. Makes peerfect sense. Yet Golden dragon is also right in sense that the huge figure is indicative of PLAAF interest…further supported by the article from Dawn talking of a big chinese order (though unfortunately its not a direct quote).

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697652
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Following report is from http://www.dawn.com which is probably the most reliable English news paper of Pakistani origin. However, a big problem is that pakistani press generally does not use special defence correspondents for military briefings and ordinary journalist r not the best to report/question on military related matters.

    http://www.dawn.com/2004/04/17/top2.htm
    JF-17 to be equipped with modern missiles
    By Our Staff Reporter

    ISLAMABAD, April 16: The air force on Friday announced plans to integrate the Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles into the JF-17 Thunder aircraft.

    Half of the 16 Thunders from the first batch of the supersonic third-generation aircraft are expected to be inducted into the PAF inventory by mid 2006, while the rest would be conscripted by the Chinese air force.

    Briefing journalists at the JF-17 Thunder project directorate at Chaklala, Air Vice-Marshal Shahid Lateef shared the progress being made on the project and dilated on the features of the maiden flight of prototype-3 held at Chengdu in China on April 9.

    It was for the first time that two foreign pilots had flown a prototype aircraft in China. “We have now selected the BVR missiles for integration into the JF-17 Thunder. We made a breakthrough recently by acquiring the technology,” he said. He said the JF-17 would also carry H-2 and H-4 bombs.

    About the avionics component of the JF-17, AVM Lateef said the West was reluctant to offer help in this regard. He said an avionics package for the aircraft had been examined and a contract for it would be finalized next month. In reply to a question, AVM Lateef said five radars of Italian make would be used on the prototypes.

    The information made available to the media said the prototype-1 of the aircraft was for verification of flight performance, prototype-2 for ground and load testing, prototype-3 for verification of light performance, prototype-4 for avionics and weapons integration and qualification and prototype-5 for fatigue testing. Prototype-2 and prototype-5 were only for ground tests, it said.

    AVM Lateef said induction of the aircraft would help maintain combat potential, especially at a time when the need to replace the ageing fleet was the top priority and new aircraft were not available from anywhere. “It (JF-17) would replace every aircraft that would retire,” he said.

    According to the schedule, flight testing of the aircraft would end this year. The small batch production would be followed by serial production. AVM Lateef said 25 PAF officers had been sent to China and the PAF would have enough expertise to duplicate the work in Pakistan when the people trained in China returned.

    He said a number of countries were interested in buying the aircraft. He said the Chinese air force had ordered the aircraft in big numbers.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697659
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    If 03 indeed made its maiden flight on 9 April and FC-1 went supersonic on the same date (flown by PAF pilot) then perhaps it was 01 and not 03.

    Regarding this stealth issue, as the project director said to the effect… Although Stealth was not a requirement, the issue was not ignored during its R&D.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697660
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Golden Drangon

    First time i played Air combat (an old game by today’s standards:D ) on playstation, my F-16 zoomed past a flanker as it pulled a cobra from nowhere.

    But not again.

    Next time, i maintained some distance when in pursuit and when it was almost stationary in mid air, a missile went straight into it.;)

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697729
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Out of 16 JF-17 fighter places only eight jet planes will be provided to Paksitan other eight to China Air Force

    Could dis mean that PLAAF have also expressed interest in this machine.
    OR
    Could there be another reason?

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697918
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    Can anyone provide a better translation for the follwoing quotes from the above article please…for better understanding?

    Chengdu business newspaper: “Owlet dragon” goal market approximately in which countries and area?

    Commander-in-chief faces the forest: At present the main user develops the cooperation side, but also has very many countries extremely to be interested to this airplane, is discussing with us, should say the international market potential is very big.

    Chengdu business newspaper: Its potential market has in a big way?

    Commander-in-chief faces the forest: My individual view is about 1,000. If according to “the owlet dragon” the selling price 100 million Renminbi, is 100 billion Renminbi.

    Chengdu business newspaper: “Owlet’s dragon 03” becomes Γ₯ŠŸé¦– flies, is not meant already had has been allowed the continual volume production ability? Official payment use in when?

    Commander-in-chief faces the forest: The continual volume production should be does not have the question. At present, already carried on the small volume production the preparation, officially paid the use also to need period of time.

    Chengdu business newspaper: It is reported “the owlet dragon” has the certain stealth ability?

    Commander-in-chief faces the forest: When design, certainly not sedulously pursues the stealth ability, but or has the consideration in the air operated layout aspect.

    PS. Am i correct in understanding that 7 sU-27 protypes crashed during its development and that cobra manuever was an accidental discovery???

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697920
    vikasrehman
    Participant

    But with precision bombing, you don’t really need a high payload. High payload is only for carpet bombers. You can extract similar effectiveness with guided missiles and LGBs; a TV guided missile of the Maverick class is only about 300kg, and when you carry about four of them that amounts to 1200kg. You’re not even halfway the FC-1’s total payload of 3800kg. LGBs are usually of the 250kg and 500kg class.

    But for deep interdiction with 3 fuel tanks and 2 IR AAMs on outer pylons, FC-1 will only have 2 hardpoints left. And if so, it may require more fighters for escort which means more head ache for mission planners.

    If serial production of FC-1 starts in 2006 and first batcg order is completed by 2009, then there may be enough time and funding (through sales) for extra testing required for another version of FC-1.

    PS. Im merely speculating. hopefully PAF will be able to get another hi tech fighter and wouldnt b limitd when it comes to deep strike missions.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 1,386 total)