halloweeneRegarding the 11g turn, I have posted screenshot of video showing the G-meter capped at 10g.
That this would be the result of the G-meter hodometer or that of a FCS limiter we don’t known (but can reasonably guess).*The video was later removed from the entire web…
FCS limiter is set at 9g but their is a mechanical stop that can be overcome to -very temporarilly- 11g. A bit like in F-18.
halloweeneSo how can we be sure the twitter account belong to the real pilot?.There are many fake self-proclaimed experts on all military forums. So why twitter should be treated different. After all, it is not that hard to create a twitter or fb account.
p/s : If i give you the benefit of the doubt and say you telling the truth aka that is a legit account. Finding references is still your job. If you claim that garry is wrong, then it is your job to back that up. If you fail to do that then your claim have no weight.
Maybe check who he is talking to and who is answering him? Easy…
halloweeneSo you basically cited something that has nothing to do with active cancellation to start with.Putting some acronym together, pretend like it answer the question .Then get mad when someone writes down the actual definition and working principles of such thing?.
And you didn’t cited the electronic engineer who work with the system, you cited the marketing guy. Moreover, you didn’t dare to cite everything because it will expose your lack of understanding about both systems.
Calling me pathetic? so how come you still have to hide behind these made up stories? how come you still haven’t explain the relation between that sound system and wave interference in active cancellation?
Not my bad if you do not understand what iFi mother company electronicians wrote. He wrote the system was designed using active cancellation BECAUSE a linear regulator would NOT have fit. And after you pitifully attempt to disclaim “explaining” (sorry copy pasting wikipedia without sourcing your comment) how works what they DID NOT use to say it is not active cancellation… Of course a linear regulator isn’t… And they did not build one!
How typical from you…
Which acronym did i use? Cite one? Lying again…
And you did not write down any definition, you simply copied wikipedia attempting to explain something you do not comprehend. (otherwise you would have been able to explain it by yourself). How would you the heck know who i was talking to at Abingdon Music Research? You claim it was a PR? Prove it! (your way to act usually no)? I
Of course, i guess you know their stuff better than the company involved… And i cite what i want to cite, it is not an anonymous armchair expert in wikipedia that will dictate which part of conversations i have i will -or not- cite.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]248186[/ATTACH]
Fairly well explained by the company here. Nothing to do with wave interference as electric parasitic noise has nothing to do with radioelectric waves. Still the active cancellation principle is applied (although not using half wavelength displaced signal as it would for radar waves cancellation). NVM…
By generating a signal identical to the noise signal but in the exact opposite phase, it actively cancels all the incoming noise. ANC+® is the perfect ‘antidote’ for power supply noise, the bane of USB audio.
ANC+(3)
With ANC+® the power line is filtered for audio band and RF noise. The measured noise floor of 0.1uV (0.0000001V) is at the measurement limit of what even the most sophisticated Audio Precision equipment is capable of.
Measured noise drops by 100 times or 40dB in comparison to the common noise filters.
Sonically, the background and inner resolution to recordings is brought to the fore and no longer hidden. Sonics are much smoother, just like how good analogue should be. Nothing comes close.
[/I]
http://ifi-audio.com/portfolio-view/micro-iusb3-0/
Pathetic again…
halloweeneA linear regulator is a system used to maintain a steady voltage. The resistance of the regulator varies in accordance with the load resulting in a constant output voltage. It continuously adjusting a voltage divider network to maintain a constant output voltage and continually dissipating the difference between the input and regulated voltages as waste heat.. A simple example of a voltage divider is two resistors connected in series, with the input voltage applied across the resistor pair and the output voltage emerging from the connection between them. That is not, in any ways, shape or forms similar to activate cancellation jamming principles, which is based on wave destructive interference.
What next? are you gonna claim the suspension of vehicle is the same as active cancellation?
Dont pretend to be mysterious, you simply dont say the whole thing because you worried that it would be wrong and it would shows people that you dont even understand the principles, better say only a part of it and tell people to figure out themselves so that if they debunk it again you can blame it on their interpretation
At least i will quote electeronicians directly involved instead of copy pasting wikipedia… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_regulator and calling it “debunking”…
pathetic…
halloweeneso you favor the french grande crowd like msphere and halloweene, aka picard?
you can call me picard as much as you want, why would i care? Sorry, but you are totally insignificant to me so…
halloweeneStop being stubborn and listen little birds twitting @jrvianney tovaritch. I already gave you the hint.
halloweeneJust because you call me a troll doesn’t mean people will see me as a troll.Let readers themselves decide who looks more like a troll to them.The one who back up his claims with evidence or the one who always pretend to be mysterious while show nothing of content.
Nah they will only see you as a troll if they look at you… And as noone is interested…
AGAIN I DID NOT MAKE ANY CLAIM in this topic before previous post. FIND ONE before keeping lying please.
I do not have to prove something i did not say… And i’m not your mum boy to make your homework and referencing job…
You did assertions when you “analysed” Picard’s stuff. I did not. And some of your assertions were wrong, but i’m not interested in debating with you as said above.
You should better thank me for sending references with exact data. Note that i did not claim any!
halloweeneHow can grraya be considered the troll here?.He provides links and explanations for his comments, and as far as i understand he is correct. What have you provided to counter his claim?Seem like this is the new hot trend around here. See someone disagree with you?. Cant win with logical well thought argument? , better call them a troll and ask about ignore button to shut them up.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]248182[/ATTACH]
He provides links to “debunk” something as i DID not say anything, except helping to find relevant infos. That is purely trolling : assuming someone said something he didn’t just in order to criticize it later. He asks me to prove assertions i didn’t do. Flamer attitude, sorry. If he is too lazy to find that from AWST , or that https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/combat-ready-53125/ , or that… http://www.senat.fr/rap/a13-158-8/a13-158-814.html, or that… http://www.defesanet.com.br/rafale/noticia/10893/Shooting-Down-an-Aggressor-on-My-Six–Vive-la-difference-/ or those… https://www.dropbox.com/s/dv8sr9dudblqq7j/12918_resize_800_600_false_true_null.jpg?dl=0 and https://www.dropbox.com/s/iqkar66xwfggyl7/12920_resize_620_380_true_false_null.jpg?dl=0
etc…
AGAIN I DID NOT MAKE ANY CLAIM he is just flame baiting… I ONLY GAVE HINTS SO AS WHERE TO FIND RELEVANT AND VERIFIED INFO.
So someone explaining that when a heavy point is used the FCS limits to 5g Rafale and trying to be taken seriously? FCS is constantly automatically updated considering present loads. And in heaviest config, limit is 5.5g. Btw Rafale structural limit was tested up to 17 or 18g. THIS IS an assertion…
halloweeneThink of the absurdity of what you are writing. A datalink would need a missile-mounted antenna. If the missile had such an antenna, I would have seen it. The ‘short’ missiles I saw had no such antenna.
Of course, it is possible that once I had left the assembly area, the completed ‘short’ rounds that I’d been shown were put back on the line, stripped down, had the antenna installed, and were then reassembled. Not exactly a convincing hypothesis, is it?
It is possible that the engineer who explained the ASRAAM dome heating problem to me had taken too much LSD in his mid-morning coffee, or that the company had decided to pretend it had a non-existent problem just to confuse my client of that time, but once again neither constitutes a realistic hypothesis.
Your suggestion that I have somehow changed my story is also absurd. Is seeing missiles being assembled somehow incompatible with having been briefed on the programme? A trip along the production line is often a stock part of any visit to a company. In practice, the ASRAAM programme has been running for more than 30 years, and I have had a number of briefings over that time.
Time to turn on the TV and watch a few episodes of the old TV series “The Prisoner”. The fact that the programme didn’t make sense was part of the fun. Can’t say the same for this thread…
Asking Lukos to think and speaking of absurdity? On purpose Mercurius? Semilliant today?
halloweeneWhat make you think i haven’t checked these numbers ?, there is nothing support his physics defying claims
Btw, this is not defense india forum, so putting up some acnonyms and pretending to be mystery is not enough, most Keypub members are smart enough to see right through that BS, so if you want people to believe your claims, you better back it up with evidences ( real one not made up figures)
Agree with that part. Plz don’t forget to exclude yourself from those folks.
I did not assert ANY number neither claim ANYTHING on that topic. So i don’t see what i would have to prove, especially to a troll too lazy to make his own research, even when it is prechewed.
Defesanet article is easy to find. So is AWST Mike Yeoh test.
So instead of “debunking inexistant claims make my day and shut up. Before be nice, tell me where is ignore button?
halloweenenote all the picard supporters. halloweene, msphere, etc are also all the france grande group. will always favor rafale and bash any other aircraft.
Oh shut up 250… Picard is Croatian for your info. Why not ask PLAAF what exactly happened over Paracels in April 2013 (hint, it involves a since unfortunately deceased chinese pilot, sincere RIP), but i think if you do so we will not see you here for a loong time from your democratic country…
halloweeneSo you are picard?
If yes then let’s make it simple, did Vianney Riller claim any of thisor this
or this
I want a straight and direct answer
(i) i’m not croatian so i can’t be picard. Do your homework, cjheck figures on defesanet,i do not have enough available time to chew your job. Did you see me claim Picard’s figure were the right ones? Sry i only said you could find them from Vianney’s articles on defesanet. Now move ur a.. and for once try to find a reference when tools are given to you.
halloweene[ATTACH=CONFIG]248147[/ATTACH]
Lockheed reports successful F-35 integration with Aegis system:-WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, N.M., Sept. 13 (UPI) — Lockheed Martin reported Tuesday that the F-35 Lightning II and and the Aegis weapon system worked together for the first time during a live-fire exercise.
The joint exercise Monday between the company, the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Marine Corps was the first live-fire missile test that successfully demonstrated the integration of the F-35 to support Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air, the company said in a statement.
During the test, an unmodified Marine Corps F-35B acted as an elevated sensor and detected an over-the-horizon threat.
The jet sent data through the aircraft’s Multi-Function Advanced Data Link to a ground station connected to Aegis on the USS Desert Ship, a land-based ship.
The target was then engaged and intercepted with a Standard Missile 6.
Lockheed said the test reflects how the 5th-generation fighter can be a force multiplier.
When the capability is fully realized, it will increase situational awareness using Aegis and the F-35 together to better understand the maritime operational environment.
“Using any variant of the F-35 as a broad area sensor, the aircraft can significantly increase the Aegis capability to detect, track and engage,” Lockheed said.
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2016/09/13/Lockheed-reports-successful-F-35-integration-with-Aegis-system/3731473773308/Awesome.
Nice achievement.Much more important in my opinion than “stealth” but of course it is only my opinion
halloweeneSo where is your evidence? in exactly what way main noise cancellation in a cable similar to activate cancellation again radar system?
All i see is you posting whatever has a word active cancellation next to it, and say that is the evidence. But i doubt that you understand how the system work at all.
Now, i supposed that you didn’t lie and actually talked to the company then you should be able to answer this question by Sigma
Our technical director, Mr. Loesch spent some time in military electronics and being an aerospace enthusiast, he does follow the topic with enthusiasm.
While wrestling with the problem how to remove the high noise present on the USB Bus for items powered from it (e.g. a USB DAC) without using traditional linear regulators he encountered articles claiming the active radar cancellation of the Thales SPECTRA system on the Rafale. This immediately made sense at the conceptual level.
Linear regulators invariably place a series element in the power supply line and must lose some (often significant) voltage and power to allow them to operate. The resulting overheads and loss of performance caused by linear regulators severely limit their use where for example you wish to power a DAC Chip that requires 5V (+/-10%) from a USB Socket which provides 5V (+/-10%) of power. There is simply no overhead available with which to work
sry i keep the rest for myself. Go figure.
halloweene^ Here we go with the pilot stories again
:rolleyes:
btw i did added JR Vianney Riller on Fb, but it pretty much seem like a fake account. Very few friends, very few posts, as if someone created it to deceive people.
it is not fake, but i won’t give you his cell phone so as you can check. He is more active on tweeter. BTW he uses parcimonuously FB. Wouldn’t change the articles on defesanet btw.
BTW, pretty sad noone mentioned recently deceased Pete Collins. He was a very great and simple man and pilot. RIP friend.
Sign In
