I do not know if this will interest anyboy but…
I recently lookedat a Peter Ricketts interview by the defence commission at french assemblee nationale (he participates to the new whitebook). He stated that cataplts would have cost 2-3 billions and therfore were dropped.
And in this very case, a quite potent aircraft… Good bang for the buck no?
Assuming reason on a fighter aircraft forum, are you suicidal Tu?
I’ll take the bookmaker role and commissions ok? atm, odds are 8.5 to 1.5… Minus my 10%
this kind of jamming only jam 1 radar at a time
So you assume F35would shoot 2 missiles or more at a time? Considering its internal emport, they’d be out fo ammos rather quickly.
Brazil’s FX-2 is a strange beast. I could envision some convoluted deal whereby Brazil takes all the 2000-9s with full technology transfer as part of an agreement with France for joint carrier construction and fielding of evolved Rafale in mid-2020s.
Obviously that’s just one scenario, but the longer this FX-2 business drags on the more convinced I am that something huge is bubbling beneath the surface, and if Dassault secures the UAE contract the 2000-9s could certainly be part of it.
Definitely.
And the really, really interesting question: the future of 60-odd extensively upgraded Mirage 2000-9.
I really can’t fathom who’d want these.
I could see Brazil getting a small batch to replace current Mirage 2000C/B which are nearly out of life but that’s about it. Perhaps Jordan to replace F-5 but then they retired more capable Mirage F1s due to cost of operation..
Argentina doesn’t want 2nd hand, Pakistan is not a customer cause Dassault would not want to jeopardise Rafale contract.
There were rumours about Lybia and Tunisia.
Dunno what Dassault is (or not) offering to UAE, but they did offer Brazil to build Rafale wings for every Rafales, including french ones. (times ago)
I like that article on the subject. It’s a bit technical at time, but the summary would be that as long as the missile’s ECCM aren’t designed to counter cross-eye jamming and that your ECM system can do it successfully using repeater techniques (same as in DRFM), you can make the missile think the real target is way off where your aircraft is supposed to be.
The problem I would think would be that one of the ECCM technique used is dual link. If a hostile radar can keep tracking your aircraft even as the launcher is manoeuvering away (another fighter behind for exemple)…
Definitely agree… But that also means that fighter radar should keep tracking target during the whole flight… Way after its “first shot” (and absolute probability to be detected), ****s up the idea of “sneak into invisible, shoot and run”. Maybe i’m doing science fiction…
They would have to defeat HOJ capabilities of most modern missiles. Of course if they can use their AESA to fry the missile’s sensors that would be something else.
Using cross-eye jamming?
In a dream world, both eurofighter and Dassault CEOs would tweet at the same time that they consider Bin Zayed conditions unworkable 😀
Haggis is scottish…
From personal experience, english cuisine isnt as terrible as usually said in France…Still miles away from french cuisine imo 🙂
Champagne and croissant vs. … haggis? :p
(Ok so I have no idea about English cuisine — or any cuisine for that matter — but talk about conforming to national stereotypes!)
Wait and see… Hard to wait!
Another question. ASSUMING (not sure) that modern WF suits are unable to jam properly modern AESA LPI radars, couldnt they jam missile seekers? shooting first a useless missile therefore wouldnt be such a huge advantage would it?
I’m wondering about something after reading many assumptions about stealth and LPI radars…
Is an ARM weapon to be induced on F35? Because if i understand some aruments given here, it would be completely useless vs modern AESA LPI ground radars no? (unable to lock them)…