dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2143340
    halloweene
    Participant

    Incident of a 2000D in Cad. Engine took fire. !no casualty, WSO slightly injured

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2143478
    halloweene
    Participant

    F-35 B can operate from L61, certainly, but from austere bases????

    in reply to: Canadian Fantasy Fleet #2005278
    halloweene
    Participant

    Would you be british?

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2143558
    halloweene
    Participant

    Skylark 3 soars after operational approval

    Still has its proprietary Goegraphy software? A pain!

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2144046
    halloweene
    Participant

    Was it already posted?
    SUBJECT: How the F-35 is Meeting Current and Future Fifth Generation Fighter Capability
    STATEMENT OF: Lieutenant General (s) Jerry D. Harris Jr., USAF
    Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Plans and Requirements
    Headquarters U.S. Air Force
    FEBRUARY 16, 2017

    http://docs.house.gov/meetings/AS/AS25/20170216/105552/HHRG-115-AS25-Wstate-HarrisJ-20170216.pdf

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2144492
    halloweene
    Participant

    What sensors are you referring to? They are all integrated, and the software patch of four ship fusion was tested and fielded long ago.

    And still do not work (false alarms, tracks disappearance etc.) or no?

    “You’re going to see us continuing to do a business-case analysis of retrofit of these aircraft,” he said during a Sept. 19 press conference. But he quickly added that this is not a new kind of discussion—the Air Force had the same one around the F-16, the F-15 and F-22.

    very consistent with…

    F-35 Retrofit Cost Estimates Come Down

    Another beatiful rosy announcement in 2013 about future of retrofit….

    MISMANAGEMENT

    (not essential for program, BUT mismanagement).

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2144682
    halloweene
    Participant

    “Our mods program is almost as exciting and dwarfing our production program.”

    With that in mind, Winter said it is time to consider perhaps not modifying every aircraft to the Block 3F standard that would enable it carry a full complement of air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons. Testing of Block 3F could be delivered by the end of this year. “We’re looking at a solution space that gives our warfighter options,” he said.

    AW

    And JPO has niothing to do with it? i thought he was head of JPO…
    Genuine question : a new calculator was alsways scheduled for FOC?

    However, if that change was not anticipated/scheduled before, it is a clue about the terrible mismanagement of the program. (even if it is not directly very harmful…)
    About concurrency and delays… How many 2B were scheduled? Wohmany will be ordered in the end?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2144740
    halloweene
    Participant

    And multiple delays and concurrency have nothing to do with hte obsolescence of systems before they are operational?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2144976
    halloweene
    Participant

    Seriously this time, is the “2 visors” issue fixed?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145002
    halloweene
    Participant

    While I am also of the opinion that all the training jets should be upgraded to 3F your point is not valid. Pilots who graduate from an Operational Conversion Unit come out at a baseline standard. The intent of the course is to learn to fly the jet and then depending upon type, operate the jet in basic A2A and A2G scenarios with baseline threats. The difference then between a 2B and 3F for OCU is marginal at best. When aircrew leave OCU they start at ‘D’ Cat, functioning as a junior squadron member and spend the next year or two learning the jet, tactics and threat capabilities before they graduate higher, can command a pair and then years later a four ship.

    The OCUs I am aware of for several western Air Forces all operate typically either lesser capable jets or delay upgrading the OCU jets until last.

    Look, i understand it would not be catastrophic . But tbh, if it happens it will still be a big failure of program management.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145026
    halloweene
    Participant

    It might be helpful to look at the state of every other airforce and fleet before throwing passive-aggressive barbs at the USAF plans for the F-35. In a perfect world, all aircraft in everyone’s service were up to date, combat capable, and well maintained. Reality does not support that.

    Wow, and vvery soon i’ll learn that “it was always the plan”… And no, a conversion unit equiped with subpar standard is not a good idea. You are qualifying pilots on subpar stds (aka not fully qualified)

    Ejection seat issue not so fixed???

    Safety Experts: Some F-35 Ejections Pose ‘Serious’ Death Risk

    http://www.rollcall.com/news//safety-experts-some-f-35-ejections-pose-serious-death-risk/

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145198
    halloweene
    Participant

    Are the Typhoons in OCU units “expensive” for a trainer? Are the Rafale in 2/92 Aquitaine “expensive” training aircraft

    I don’t know about Typhoons, but Rafale from 2/92 are F3.4 type afaik.Again i did not originally comment.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145202
    halloweene
    Participant

    That is 1 of several proposals and nothing has been decided.

    yes. i said “would” not will 😉

    But if so, quite expensive for a trainer…

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145217
    halloweene
    Participant

    It has always been like that in aviation, at least with large programs. See the P51, P47, F-86, F100, F101…. Either Halloween has forgotten what a successful program can be or if he really makes a discovery out of this, I will suggest him to spend more time studying history and less nitpicking F35’s enormes scandales

    For the sake of discussion, i did not comment. So your opinion about me is purely fantasies.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2145261
    halloweene
    Participant

    US considers non-combat-rated subset of F-35 fleet

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/us-considers-non-combat-rated-subset-of-f-35-fleet-441248/

    Around 100 F-35 would not be upgraded to level 3 std vu reamain with 2B software…

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 4,136 total)