dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2170488
    halloweene
    Participant

    The specific long-range aircraft affected were the Austrian-made Schiebel Camcopter S-100s. “

    ty

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2172542
    halloweene
    Participant

    I did not comment. Simply posted Bloomberg article.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2172840
    halloweene
    Participant
    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2173210
    halloweene
    Participant

    Apparently there should be a laser datalink on FCAS (tested on a plane in 2006 by ONERA between plane and satellite)

    “Nous travaillons aussi sur le système de communications laser de l’appareil et sur la furtivité de l’avion, indique Franck Lefèvre, directeur des programmes de défense de l’Onera. Le développement du Neuron nous aide beaucoup.”

    https://www.challenges.fr/salon-du-bourget/avion-electrique-drones-de-combat-les-projets-de-rupture-de-l-onera_482522

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174271
    halloweene
    Participant

    Nope, Mig-31….i’ve seen them both fly during the same afternnoon. 4 times.

    Needs high AoA to turn? Well, Hallow, the harder the turn the higher the AoA. Pretty dumb statement there.

    . I know how to generate lift, TY. What i mean is that F-35 seem to need high AoA to generate it. Look at its angle when oit lands, for example etc. Fairly difficult to talk about naked eye feelings. My GF (not a pane geek) was there on sunday. “it looks powerful, impressive, much less agile and precise than Rafale.”

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174555
    halloweene
    Participant

    µYes Mig 31 . struggle, even in your short “demo”. Imprecise, need high AoA to turn, pityful time to bank etc. Hae a look at Rafale, Typhoon demo…. World a difference. It is clean.

    Vanshilar, what to do with F16?

    Btw, very nice demo showing F-35 strengths. (seen it 4 times…)

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174653
    halloweene
    Participant

    Engine, done. High AoA, done. The rest… Well… Poor roll rate, permanently struggling where eurocanards or others look to be on a rail.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174906
    halloweene
    Participant

    Again it is more subtle than that. In some case yes, the intention was delibarate to reach AoA to showcase F35 abilities in that particular domain but in other instances you could easily see this was rather a constraint.

    You can’t have it all, there is always a compromise somewhere for any jets. Having internal bays and high fuel fraction must have an impact somewhere. but again engine and FCS did a good job to limit impact even if still visible.

    Agree. F-135 ompressive,

    High AoA capabilities impressive, but needed hence the energy loss. (which is normal with high wing loading and small control surfaces.

    None of what was demoed could be matched by any of the eurocanard. I think that was the goal. Classy (no bragging) and efficient.

    Good joke. :applause:

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2174909
    halloweene
    Participant

    no. it was a raven with old datalink afaik

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2175828
    halloweene
    Participant

    About BAT120 LG (the small bomb) wight 42 kgs. Explosive ordnance above 10 Kgs. Range above 5 Kms. submetric precision, with if not at full range, capability to hit vertically.

    Interesting data from this small picture (a jurnalist embedded in a test/ferry flight)
    assembly time 2 weeks. Several months of test : 3 on ground + ?
    max speed tested during the npicture with 3x1200L tanks : mach 1.7. G limit in this config, 5.5g
    auto follow “griuond” at sea : 100 feet, 450 kts.

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2179241
    halloweene
    Participant

    stackable up to 18 told me a DGA pilot there. And it is underr a Mirage 2000 belly. It is a plug and play weapon, management of the weapons is done by the pylonand it uses its selfguidance.

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2180313
    halloweene
    Participant

    “A” IFDL afaik. ad yes if possible common standards based. Understand this is a rough program (to be fielded in 2023-5 timeframe). Should be possible with software defined radios (“contact” program part 2 : air assets) . The photo is therefore general idea, but was validated to me as very probalbe by a Istres Dassault test pilot.

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2180412
    halloweene
    Participant

    http://i956.photobucket.com/albums/ae50/emouchet/Capturerafale%20F4_zpsj1mquuvt.jpg

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2181914
    halloweene
    Participant

    sorry about that. It is a compilation of F3R and F4 stds. As soon as i have time i’ll do it. There was a recent vey interesting interview of program head at DGA. F4 is a beast. It is not broken link, it is protected by tweeter.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2181953
    halloweene
    Participant

    Here’s The Video Of The First Aerobatic Flight Demo Of The F-35: Does It Showcase Exceptional Maneuverability Or Quite The Opposite?

    https://theaviationist.com/2017/06/19/heres-the-video-of-the-first-aerobatic-flight-demo-of-the-f-35-does-it-showcase-exceptional-maneuverability-or-quite-the-opposite/

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 4,136 total)