The specific long-range aircraft affected were the Austrian-made Schiebel Camcopter S-100s. “
ty
I did not comment. Simply posted Bloomberg article.
F-35 Unreliability Risks Strain on Pentagon Budget, Tester Says
Apparently there should be a laser datalink on FCAS (tested on a plane in 2006 by ONERA between plane and satellite)
“Nous travaillons aussi sur le système de communications laser de l’appareil et sur la furtivité de l’avion, indique Franck Lefèvre, directeur des programmes de défense de l’Onera. Le développement du Neuron nous aide beaucoup.”
Nope, Mig-31….i’ve seen them both fly during the same afternnoon. 4 times.
Needs high AoA to turn? Well, Hallow, the harder the turn the higher the AoA. Pretty dumb statement there.
. I know how to generate lift, TY. What i mean is that F-35 seem to need high AoA to generate it. Look at its angle when oit lands, for example etc. Fairly difficult to talk about naked eye feelings. My GF (not a pane geek) was there on sunday. “it looks powerful, impressive, much less agile and precise than Rafale.”
µYes Mig 31 . struggle, even in your short “demo”. Imprecise, need high AoA to turn, pityful time to bank etc. Hae a look at Rafale, Typhoon demo…. World a difference. It is clean.
Vanshilar, what to do with F16?
Btw, very nice demo showing F-35 strengths. (seen it 4 times…)
Engine, done. High AoA, done. The rest… Well… Poor roll rate, permanently struggling where eurocanards or others look to be on a rail.
Again it is more subtle than that. In some case yes, the intention was delibarate to reach AoA to showcase F35 abilities in that particular domain but in other instances you could easily see this was rather a constraint.
You can’t have it all, there is always a compromise somewhere for any jets. Having internal bays and high fuel fraction must have an impact somewhere. but again engine and FCS did a good job to limit impact even if still visible.
Agree. F-135 ompressive,
High AoA capabilities impressive, but needed hence the energy loss. (which is normal with high wing loading and small control surfaces.
None of what was demoed could be matched by any of the eurocanard. I think that was the goal. Classy (no bragging) and efficient.
Good joke. :applause:
no. it was a raven with old datalink afaik
About BAT120 LG (the small bomb) wight 42 kgs. Explosive ordnance above 10 Kgs. Range above 5 Kms. submetric precision, with if not at full range, capability to hit vertically.
Interesting data from this small picture (a jurnalist embedded in a test/ferry flight)
assembly time 2 weeks. Several months of test : 3 on ground + ?
max speed tested during the npicture with 3x1200L tanks : mach 1.7. G limit in this config, 5.5g
auto follow “griuond” at sea : 100 feet, 450 kts.
stackable up to 18 told me a DGA pilot there. And it is underr a Mirage 2000 belly. It is a plug and play weapon, management of the weapons is done by the pylonand it uses its selfguidance.
“A” IFDL afaik. ad yes if possible common standards based. Understand this is a rough program (to be fielded in 2023-5 timeframe). Should be possible with software defined radios (“contact” program part 2 : air assets) . The photo is therefore general idea, but was validated to me as very probalbe by a Istres Dassault test pilot.

sorry about that. It is a compilation of F3R and F4 stds. As soon as i have time i’ll do it. There was a recent vey interesting interview of program head at DGA. F4 is a beast. It is not broken link, it is protected by tweeter.
Here’s The Video Of The First Aerobatic Flight Demo Of The F-35: Does It Showcase Exceptional Maneuverability Or Quite The Opposite?