“Another upgrade which isn’t mentioned much is the Mig-21-2000 of the IAI.”
Go ahead and put that in the LanceR one.
That upgrade is real close to the Lancer anyways.
“I don’t see how that is relevent, this is the MiG-21UPG thread, go make a F-7 thread somewhere else. The poster explicitly said this is a UPG thread.”
It’s not relevant it’s the first step in a flame war with the Indian members. They will respond about the UPG being much better armed and he will comment on how the MiG-21s of the InAF crash.
“F-7 is modified MIG-21 and PG is UPG. The reason is too provide information.”
The J-7PG has nothing to do with the MiG-21UPG and an article on the FC-1 has even less to do.
Should I open a J-7PG topic?
………….
…………..
MiG-21UPG clean………..
“What air-to-air weapons can the Lancer-A carry and what air-to-ground weapons can the Lancer-B carry. Troung can u do one of your usual stores lists for each of the three variants (including GSh-23L if it is so fitted)?”
Ok for phantom
Internal Gun
GSh-23
Air to Air weapons (A/B/C)
R-73E (AA-11)
R-550 Mk.2 (Magic II)
Python 3
R-60M/MK (AA-8)
R-13 (AA-2)
PGMs
Opher IRB
Griffin LGB
Lizard LGB
Dumb Bombs
Mk.83
Mk.82
FAB-500
FAB-250
BAEF-250
BEM-100
Rockets
S-24
S-5M
UB-32-57
UB-16-57
Pods
APR recce pod (A)
ECM pods (A/B/C)
Litening (A/B)
They should all be able to drop A2G ordance but only the A/B can laze.
I’ll check on what type of Litening pod that is.
B model Lancer…………
I knew someone would like that one.
🙂 I was to lazy to type the word Litening.
MiG-21 Lancer A………..
MiG-21 Lancer A
MiG-21 Lancer C
MiG-21 Lancer B………..
MiG-21 Lancer A with a LDP……….
Flankers from a certain nation which happens to be communist…….
“Peru said that their R77 are unusuable and about chilean’s Derbys , its only suspiccions so we can say that it seems there are no BVR weaposn at south america till now”
The FAP has the Super 530D on thier Mirage 2000EP/DPs and the R-27R on thier MiG-29S/SEs.
“And one also had to take into account that the Flanker might be more expensive to operate, but it is a force multiplier – twelve Flankers are much more effective, due to its range and weapons load, than twelve Gripens or twelve Mirage 2000s. A airforce with, let´s say, 24 Flankers is as strong as one with 36 Gripens, since the Flanker is more capable. In the long run it pays off purchasing heavy and more capable fighters, because they are able to fulfill every mission that is required of them.”
Russian weapons have a bad habit of turning out to be all hype first off and second the French have a better history of customer support then the Russians do. The Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2 would be a safer bet albiet probably more expensive. And the Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2 can preform the same missions with better weapons. The Su-35 offers no GPS guided bomb and the Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2 has longer ranged stand off weapons.