dark light

forester

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 119 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Recommendations for an enthusiast's aviation event #1164460
    forester
    Participant

    Bournemouth 20-23 August.

    You can watch it without blathering commentators.
    You can find a quiet place on the beach or cliff tops away from pushy crowds.
    It’s never rowdy.
    You can go for a swim at the same time.

    IT’S FREE.

    in reply to: Lanc NOT showing its age! #1167644
    forester
    Participant

    Very spirited display at Dover’s Bleriot 100 yesterday with some steep turns around the high terrain in a testing wind – and looking immaculate. Anyone up on the Castle Keep would have got some good shots. Another display due there today so that’s what you saw.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1181391
    forester
    Participant

    The Vulcan was ready to fly by about it’s due slot time of 3.30ish, but the weather was already too bad.

    The Rafael didn’t fly in Yellow state conditions, the ceiling was about 1200ft at that time,

    No.

    The Flying Display Programme I have in front of me scheduled the Vulcan to fly at 1500 and the Finale at 1600.

    And No.
    The Rafale most certainly didn’t have 1200ft cloudbase. It went up “to check the weather” which it did several times – from an inverted position!

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1182990
    forester
    Participant

    Why schedule it to fly near the end of the progamme knowing it is a complex aircraft which might need time for a quick fix after engine start and knowing the weather forecast for the day?

    Then, seeing huge gaps in the programme appearing because of other cancellations, why was it not brought forward by the organisers, also in the knowledge the weather was forecast to deteriorate further towards evening?

    By the way, the Rafale didn’t just fly, it gave a stunning display in what was probably the worst period of weather of the day, putting the Navy’s efforts for the entire day to shame.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1183477
    forester
    Participant

    Let’s be quite clear about this: the weather at Yeovilton was above limits for some sort of display for most of the day.
    Those teams that wanted to get airborne and make the most of it put on some good displays. If 558 had managed just one circuit and landed the very large crowd that came to see it would have been satisfied, even a single high speed run along the runway would have been worthwhile.

    in reply to: BA reports massive losses #545820
    forester
    Participant

    This surely is a fuel price hedging problem. The underlying performance is quite good compared to other airlines. BA avoided the worst of the fuel price surge earlier by hedging and now the same device results in paying over the odds when the price falls.
    Most likely the next set of results will be good resulting in Willie and his crew getting their bonuses back while the workers will have been tricked into accepting pay reductions.
    Good on BALPA for calling the bluff.

    in reply to: Blast from the past #549039
    forester
    Participant

    Classic beauty? Hardly!

    More a graphic example of how attempts to copy beauty so often fail to capture its essence.

    in reply to: Passengers accuse Air France of racial profiling #550006
    forester
    Participant

    India started the visa war many years ago.

    I recall being similarly held in the Mumbai Departure lounge as flight crew travelling passenger and therefore not having the “correct visa” in the eyes of the immigration officer.

    I didn’t whinge about racial profiling, though.

    in reply to: Comet Series 1 #1176082
    forester
    Participant

    THE book for colour photos of the Comet is:
    The First Jet Airliner – The Story of the De Havilland Comet by Timothy Walker (No 2 of the Aircraft of Distinction series) published by Scoval.
    Not cheap, but well worth it.

    in reply to: 80s BA Advert/Poster #512633
    forester
    Participant

    It might help to find out the approximate date the picture was taken then ask which advertising agency had a contract with BA at the time. If I remember rightly BA had exclusive contracts with agencies for quite long periods around that time. If you can pinpoint the agency it is much more likely to keep records and copies than BA, which keeps very little other than legally required records. The agency is also likely to be a whole lot more helpful towards you.

    Good luck.

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560038
    forester
    Participant

    Of course the engines were running, had they completely failed at 2 miles to run then they wouldn’t have made that house let alone the grass undershoot

    Not necessarily true, Deano. It depends on their speed at 2 miles. It was a windy day so the crew may well have already added a substantial increment to their target threshold speed. In the UK we use a generous margin between threshold speed and stalling speed (1.35g ). So even assuming they were right back to their target speed at two miles, there was a lot of speed available to be bled off from approach speed to the stick-shake. With just 40-odd seconds to run they would only be only looking for an extra 10-15 seconds to get them over the fence, even if the engines were running down (thrust decays more slowly on a big fan engine). I’m not saying that’s what happened and the evidence seems to suggest at least the left engine was running on touchdown.

    in reply to: Will 'British Airways' rebrand as 'BA' #561700
    forester
    Participant

    does anyone think that when the time comes for it’s next major rebranding exercise that “British Airways” will and perhaps should become ‘BA’ ?

    British Airways is unlikely to rebrand itself….

    ……but, with predators circling constantly, the private equity firm that takes it over most certainly will.

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #561724
    forester
    Participant

    Sounds like the engines did not fail in the complete failure sense, they just did not respond?

    It looks like the engines went into a sub-idle mode, for some reason. The right-hand engine appears to have then run down completely, while the left kept running but appears not to have been recoverable to a normal flight idle condition from which it could be accelerated.

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #562157
    forester
    Participant

    Photographs clearly show the right-hand engine was not running at the time of impact, since the fan blades are still intact.

    The left-hand engine blades all have their tips missing. It is not clear from the photos when this damage occurred. It may have occurred in flight, in which case it would have ceased delivering significant power at this point, or it may show this engine was still running on impact and the damage occurred then.

    Either way there was certainly an engine failure, possibly double.

    in reply to: No.10 Squadron RAF VC10 survivors? #1302570
    forester
    Participant

    – nothing fancy just a 30 minute flight around the UK.

    And we used to think M0.86 was fast for a VC10…….

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 119 total)