Congress is never going to allow this. They wouldn’t allow the Navy to divest of geriatric CG-47’s
. One thing is for sure though, if the wreckage of the AMRAAM is true, that disproves the official Pakistani line that no F-16s were used.
Sure, if the AMRAAM wreckage is confirmed. Pakistan has one very big reason to deny F-16 involvement in the counterstrike…. and it has nothing to do with hiding losses:
U_i_e_ S_at_s
https://hushkit.net/2019/02/26/how-g…si-think-tank/
Everyone’s favorite RUSI analyst talks J-10C.
“We’re partnering with Kessel Run on prototyping ALIS improvements for the warfighter and working closely with the JPO on a strategy for the rapid development and delivery of ALIS software driving long-term sustainability of the program,”
Oops- BiO already posted this article in F-35 thread.
Posters on this thread who are nationals (and ex-pats) from both nations showed considerable restraint and decorum on the India and Pakistan threads for the majority of this crisis. Commendable. Let’s not watch it devolve into recriminations, sniping, and bombastic comments now.
Finally, I do feel for Scooter. No chance for F-16 or F-21 for IAF now
Two points, there still is no evidence of any F-16 lost. The other obvious point is that the IAF isn’t naive. The F-16 block 70 ( F-16V, F-21 “rebranding exercise”) isn’t equivalent to an F-16 block 15 from the 1980’s (majority of PAF holdings), or even the few block 50’s they possess. The effectiveness of a modern fighter is systems based and the F-16 block 70 is a different beast than the legacy F-16’s (new AESA, IDAS, mission computer, software, IFF, HUD, flat panel displays, on and on).
They will choose (or likely not choose) the RFI submission based on multiple factors, outer mold lines and designation aren’t likely to be one of them. If the F-16 block 70 isn’t chosen, lack of room for future growth is a major strike against it (besides the byzantine acquisition practices of India).
News thread… Many posters just want news…. there are 20 different discussion threads.
Scooter- no one wants your critique of the news. I don’t post these based on my opinions. Just what I read them and posted them based on what others might think is interesting or timely.
Take the links over to a respective thread and have at it.
if you remember there was one poster, tango III who handled posting articles, 20k+ Posts.
good overview of block 4 planning and TR3.
RAC MiG jumping into the Indian RFI- local MiG-35 production:
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/russian-aerospace-behemoth-rac-mig-now-offers-localise-mig-35-production-792688
Alex Holllings making the case for the F-15X based on the costs of keeping the F-15C flying.
Interesting ASQ-239 tidbit:
the AN/ASQ-239 is its apparent use of so-called ‘cognitive’ electronic warfare techniques. Cognitive EW intends to increase the amount of processing which an aircraft EW system can perform as soon as it detects a potentially-hostile RF signal.
inside the EW system to identify an RF transmission and its waveform,even if this has not been encountered by the system before, and then to devise…Ultimately, such an approach promises to greatly accelerate the speed with which hostile signals can be detected and then jammed. This will help to protect combat aircraft carrying such EW systems, and also other aircraft in a strike package which may not possess cognitive EW capabilities.
Anyone interested in Airborne EW systems, good overview in Armada:
https://armadainternational.com/2018…une-july-2018/
Oops wrong one but worth a read anyway.
Here:
https://armadainternational.com/2017/06/compendium-airborne-electronic-warfare-junejuly-2017/