does there have info what is range and speed is of f-22 with afterburners. meaning aircraft takes off flies with full gas goes at max speed (what is it?) and covers how much distance ,with weapons included . and fuel weight is how much of total weigh?
New and simple marketing video, at least I haven’t seen it before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn6nx_GGERQ&feature=related
but,but why suhois as enemy ,flying around doing nothing,why not typhoons going down?
Suhoi has better marketing section of firm.
OMG we need PAK-FA ,Su-29 immediatelly 😀
and F-15SE (second edition) ,it does not have vectored trust …oh quite a dissapointment.
40N6 or 400N6 is planned ,and its based on N6 missile general design.
since this forum likes forbbiden footage here is for rodolfo from mobile phone.
talk betwen division and 2 batery commanders ,during deployment of missiles.
kommander is no very happy,rookies make some mistakes in procedure :diablo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkd9OMNZITk&feature=related
north korea realised its cannot maintain parity and equal military against south korea and america so asymetric response was with nukes ,
tactical and inter-kontinental.
tactical of small range woud crush south army ,and longrangeos ones will keep amerika away. norths army would survive in underground tunnes ready to take over ,and march on command.
this pace was accelerated especially after amerikan invasion of south iraq in 1991,where big conventional army was destroyed.
noth korean military planers were very smart.
May be they know that they make good planes. 😀 If they do, they will be dammed as Russian propaganda. Secondly, Russian arms market is pretty much very less conflicting with Western/US market. hey your neighbor bought f-16, counter it with our MiG-29 etc.
I always wondered if Russians got hold of US/Western planes like vice versa has happened. Do, they have data on western/Us a/c’s to simulate? have Russians ever got hold of a F-16 or F-15 or F-18 or Mirage or anything else?
Ofcourse it is done but its much more serious and with scenarios and missions of interest.also it is considered top secret.
well vietnam ,malesia,venecuela provided good source of info of amerikan fighters, also a espionage effort long ago i think in japan about F-15 secrets revealed and manuals ,etc.
Also live exercise is done with china,KA3AXCTAH and belarus most recent i can remember.
is there some other video of this and other simulations. maybe the westerners are hiding it,and the truth .:eek:;)
i told you russian technology is superior, and this video shows it.
then again how would you make kill ratios based on this 2 videos ,.
16:1 too much, ore underestimateded.:diablo:
Yes, funny, isn’t it? 😀
The Russians are a bit behind when comes to marketing of weapons. They still need to learn our capitalistic tricks.Ok, maybe they haven’t done a simulation, but look at this, they ‘ve done it in a way that even a small child can understand it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7ChAzr7iFE
See how it is smoking all Typhoons? 😀 More than simulation! Visual experience! 😀 At 5:36 and 7:12 you can almost suspect that the Russian pilot is laughing below the mask, while looking at his wingman. What can a simulation say more than this! 😀 Besides, as the video clearly demonstrates, there is no defence against a Pugachev’s Cobra.
ah yes this is true result from our simulations.
we took best operational 4,5 gen fighter and completely destroyead him.
first combat its 3 vs 2 and 2 agressours go down.
second its 2 vs 4 ,even with help of awacs typhoon is helpless, 4 go down.
so final score ratio is ? hmmm….
well even 1 was enough to kill both typhoons in first fight so 2:1
and second it was fight of 2 against 4 and both alive so 8:1
so realistic result of simulations show SU-35 is at least 16 times superior!!! to poore typhoon (even awacs doesnt help).
buy russian.
ta-da…
Because it makes no sense to develop a warhead for a missile that has about a 50% chance of getting off the launch pad. Then there’s the issue of accuracy…a 2-4 kiloton warhead mated to a horribly inaccurate missile system isn’t going to do anything impressive.
The best uses for these weapons aren’t fitted to missiles…
No no you think it wrongs ,this is good for its tactical balistic missiles that can cover south korea ,missiles of scud type- small range, without using too much nuklear fuel and heavy warhead ,thus making them too short range.
up to 5 kt is great for crushing large army formations of south korea and not destroy your troops close within that hiding in tunnels.
And because north knowes it can only win if renders usa impotents with military unable to use its power because of amerikan fear of nukes, unlike it was in 50s, so investing into 50 taepodongos is worth it ,even with 50% chanse ,but it will get better for sure.
You need to improve your grip on reality. I’ve never even been to the USA, & I’ve just been accused on another thread of consistent anti-Americanism. :diablo:
And in case you hadn’t noticed – N. Korea has no way of getting a nuclear weapon there.
that was deadly serious :diablo:
on other hand ,north korea has been preparing 50 years for this war, thay say they are 2 koreas one on surface and another undergorund.
tactical nukes would totaly destroy any heavy massing of troops ,terrain is useless for tanks ,planes will be destroyed on the ground ,and smaller troops will be decimated by special forces and guerilla tactics.
It is semi-active guided, with possible radio command guided which is cheapest option used also on some shorter missiles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcmn7Pl4gZg&feature=related
modernised neva s/125M has this radio command improved controls put on it from big s-300 missile inside the body ,doing the corkscrew at 0:40.
swerve i think youre wrong ,and read post number 28 about that.:diablo:
besides tactical nukes falling around it would make it a complete useless ‘victory’ …
those planes have to take off and prepare and spyes would help north make preemptive strikes and destroy aircraft on ground with tactical missiles (this asymetric response nobody accounts for from north ,to nullify air component of americas cariers and south)
therefor losing their only advantage…planes have to take off ,land ,refuel ,rearm etc..you know..:rolleyes:
besides,it would be atomic hell on whole peninsulay. nobody would win.
Just a question.
The other day, I was listening to a report on CNN (I think it was by Barbara Star???), who said (quoting Pentagon sources) that pentagon is not over worried about North Korean nukes for the time being. They know that (for the time being) NK could only rely on its fighters to deliver a bomb (and seeing the state of its AF its not all that much of a pressing threat) and that it would take NK years to develop a nuclear warhead that could be employed on a missile.
So, that was NK. But if so, why is there so much hoo haa about Iran, considering the state of their AF and missile development (NK is much better placed vis-a-vis missile development than Iran). Fear mongering??? To stop Iran even before they get the capability for obvious reasons, i.e. easier to deal with them now than it would be once they get a few kg of enriched uranium?
Few things…
The war on korean peninsulla was possible and almost certain ,but now its impossible…
Amerrika nkows it cant win in war, country is militirised, almost fanatised, unlike other occupied countries korea does trade and bought weapons from different dealers on open and black markets,and has plenty, the terrain is very limiting for use of armour and airforces power, its great for defence and gerrila warfare.
the usa is already overstreched by war in 2 fronts, therefore not many forces to atack ,and by ocupiing korea amrika would finish encircliment of russia and make exellent forward base for limiting china expansion so korea would not be politicaly easy to atack also..
Now they try to limit and downsize korean threat ,and mistakingly sends great message to other countries ,if you dont want to be harrasead by usa, get some nukes.:cool:
About tests why would korea not test a warhead that weight enough for its icbm taepodong.first test was limiting because it was too small explosion on such small warhead ,but this succeded on warhead no higher then 3-400kg ,exelent for tacticala nukes too.
thats thes fuss was made so early untill amerikans realised they powerless ,and now they turning another cover story.
Belive me when iran does the same youll be hearing same story from great satan:p:D
It’s rather primitive, still mostly based around liquid fuel engines with all their drawbacks from a military perspective. .
…with storable, safe to handle and transport proppelants.