dark light

Steve Rush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 148 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What's happening with the Qatari Mirage 2000's #2568891
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Qatar has F-16s now.

    You might possibly be thinking of Bahrain or Oman, swerve……?

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    p.s. what Qatar do have is plenty of US infrastructure and facilities….

    in reply to: BAE clinches 2.5 Billion Pound Tornado upgrade deal #2569211
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    AKA Fonck?

    Actually, swerve, Fonck and PILOTGHT are two different people.

    However, they do both come from the same little Rafale “glee club” which has a home on a French forum somewhere out there in cyberspace. As you’ll see from his posts, it’s all data gleaned from PR brochures and out-of-date spec sheets trawled from the web.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: BAE clinches 2.5 Billion Pound Tornado upgrade deal #2570223
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Quite honestly, the differences between Rafale and Typhoon are so marginal that your *comparison* in favor of the Rafale sounds almost comical. Rafale is, indeed a nice aircraft but to place it one league above the EF is ridiculous.

    What do you expect, Flex? It’s PILOTGHT posting under a pseudonym.

    Same old, same old….. :rolleyes:

    As I’ve said before several times, the “rumour” of 48 + 48 Rafales for Saudi came from a single source in France: ‘Les Echos’. It has just been repeated and regurgitated (especially here on this forum, actually) time and time again. Is there any substance to the rumour? Probably about as much as every other French press story that had Rafale being sold to every North African Arab nation that you can think of……

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    liushahe’s data for the AMI Typhoons that he posted earlier in this thread is also much more up-to-date: airpower.at’s info appears to be circa late 2005/very early 2006 for these.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: World's fastest airliner?? #2578680
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    How fast was the CV990?

    Good call: when I was a kid and “into” watching the ‘Smartie Tubes’ at our local airports, I always thought that the Coronado was the fastest airliner. Used to see a lot of them back in the day, as a Spanish airline called ‘Spantax’ flew them into London-Gatwick.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: If the runway aint' finished….. #2578697
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=36914

    And Soundbarrier, nice of you to simply copy-paste an opinion from the first website you found with googling the incident at http://www.alexisparkinn.com/c-130_accident.htm . At least give that site credit for your borrowed opinion :rolleyes:

    As it happens, the pictures were released by the USAF. Just because this incident was particularly embarrassing, that doesn’t make it reason enough not to publish these pictures. Crash pictures are published almost always – and besides, why would those pics ‘damage the investigation’ in any way? Hole in runway, no NOTAM, plane thundered through, there you have it.

    There. I’m commenting on a stolen opinion. Dear me.

    Arthur’s right (as is almost always the case 😮 )

    The pictures that are widely-spread throughout the ‘net of this incident almost all came from a PowerPoint file that did the rounds within 2 or 3 days of it happening. Most people saw the PPS before they even heard about the incident having happened.

    Best regards

    Steve RUsh

    in reply to: canada and russian helos #2578848
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    why would they use foreign helos ?
    are they still using them on current operations like afghanistan, irak, or lebanon? :confused:

    The contracts are open to worldwide public tender: if you happen to own a few helicopters in the right class then you can even submit a bid yourself, Fanch 🙂

    See http://www.un.org/Depts/ptd/pdf/tender.pdf for more details

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Help with F4 Phantom USAF units #2579069
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Although I’m not entirely clear as to what exactly it is you want to know, you may find this page useful (use the drop-down menus to select USAF squadrons and/or wings):

    http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/wings_groups_index.asp

    Hope it helps as a starting point for your research.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Quick ID's required #2582228
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    The chopper is a Eurocopter EC725 HUS operated by the French Army’s DAOS (special ops unit).

    Both shots look like they were taken at Farnborough this year; the EC725 HUS definitely was.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2582814
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    I hope you guys will forgive me posting an IAF-related request in this news thread 😉

    Can any kind sould please enlighten me as to the meaning of the abbreviation ‘SSS’ as used by the two Chetak units 141SSS and 142SSS Flights?

    I’ve tried every single source I can think of and they always seem to be referred to by the abbreviated name.

    Many thanks in advance

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Question… #2584756
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    No i am not saying that i am demanding this and demanding that!! And Just to clarify it i wasnt the one talking about anti-american sentiment and bla bla bla so try reading up on who is saying what. Now as i understand it a report that is from official Sources has to have more credibility then rumours and Page 3 stuff . The entire gossip page 3 extraveganza began when some rumours *( not reports from RAF officials or those from the MOD) began flying that the EF picked the F-22 from 80km and what not . AW went to the Officials at nellis dealing with the F-22 raptor and printed that ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL THAT WENT ON RECORD the F-22 was not up in the air at the same time and that raptors do not ( did not at that point) fly routinly with their full combat stealth which in that enviroment is only understandable as the raptor was not operational or required to be in operational ( combat ready state) at nellis and was undergoing testing , integration work rather then performing combat squadron duties. Now as compared to page 3 rumours about i heard this from this dude who knows this squadron officer AW presented a quoted response from an official , If you wish to weigh the rumour in the same leauge as the OFFICIAL response it is up to you .

    Almost all of that becomes completely irrelevant, however, as soon as you realise that the two Typhoons at Nellis are still there (and will be indefinitely).

    More chance of aliens landing on the lawn at Capitol Hill than Raptors and Typhoons not being in the air at the same time over the Neliis Range….

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2588130
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    By the way, you intentionally forget the reasons for a limited period of secrets.

    Not at all: that’s merely an assumption on your part. There’s a difference between total secrecy (ie black projects) and operating aircraft out in the middle of the desert from locations away from the public gaze.

    Even the Lim example is boring, because there are pics from MiGs in USAF-markings from the 60s/70s long before.

    Sorry to bore you, Sens. My point was that the existence, and photo-proof, wasn’t known at the time, only some years afterwards.

    The Su-27 is widely disclosed to the public and flown by numerous Westerns. Even you can do it, when capable of paying the $ for that! The Su-27 is technology from the 70s/80s at best. A delight to fly but nothing special any longer.

    Sure, but it still no doubt represents the highest order of threat the US DoD might encounter today and, in particularly, 11 years ago which is when the pair of Belarus examples were shipped to the USA.

    Of course people wealthy enough can go and fly them in Russia, but they don’t allow you to tear the thing apart and examine all of its systems to find potential weakspots do they….

    I agree with you, that some military are crazy sometimes, but that does not justify the claim for the proof of everything!
    You can be shure that some Iraqis had taken photos from their aircraft during there military term. Despite that there is still a severe shortage of related photos. Some people are not intrested to share that with the public or not intrested to reveal their former role by that. In most cases it was an offence against an order or official forbidden to do so.

    And I agree with all of that too, Sens.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: SU27 in UK? #2588132
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    I mentioned this transfer in the “USAF Flanker” thread.

    Although that UN register report from 2001 is intriguing, it doesn’t guarantee that the Su-27P ever came to the UK, or that a UK Gov’t agency was involved. Recent transfers of aircraft like L-39s, Su-25s and Mi-8s has confirmed what some of us had suspected for a few years: that private companies acting as brokers (middlemen) are often declared as the final destination by the exporting country.

    It is possible (although perhaps unlikely) that the Su-27P mentioned could have been bought-up by a UK company and sold as a “paper transfer” immediately to another state.

    Hope this makes sense.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2590732
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    By the way, you intentionally forget the reasons for a limited period of secrets. Even the Lim example is boring, because there are pics from MiGs in USAF-markings from the 60s/70s long before. The Su-27 is widely disclosed to the public and flown by numerous Westerns. Even you can do it, when capable of paying the $ for that!
    The Su-27 is technology from the 70s/80s at best. A delight to fly but nothing special any longer. How long was the B-2 kept, which was much more advanced technology.

    http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=U-28A&btnG=Google-Suche&meta=

    I agree with you, that some military are crazy sometimes, but that does not justify the claim for the proof of everything!
    You can be shure that some Iraqis had taken photos from their aircraft during there military term. Despite that there is still a severe shortage of related photos. Some people are not intrested to share that with the public or not intrested to reveal their former role by that. In most cases it was an offence against an order or official forbidden to do so.

    Hey, Sens

    Many thanks for the search link: although almost every result that Google throws up is worthless in that case, it did in fact find a very recent photo of one of the U-28As which wasn’t there when I looked just before my vacation 😀

    http://www.azoresairphotos.com/foto.php?codfoto=2628

    It’s too late at night to pick the bones from your other points so I’ll come back to them tomorrow if I may 😉

    Thanks again

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2590786
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    A couple of points for consideration:

    1) Anybody point us to photos of US SOCOM’s U-28A aircraft? If not, then I guess they don’t really have them. :rolleyes:

    2) Where are the photos taken of the F-117A before the programme went public? After all, it flew from Tonopah for several years prior to that event.

    3) Where did the Su-27P declared as exported to the UK from Ukraine in 2001 go? This appears in the returns to the UN Conventional Arms Register.

    4) Do any of the forum members who reject out-of-hand the idea that the US has flown at least one Su-27 in assessments, or similar, have any idea how much Soviet-, Polish- and Chinese-built equipment has been shipped out to Groom Lake (or other similar facilities) down the decades? At what point in time do we consider that the DoD decided this was all a waste of time, money and effort and they put a stop to it?

    5) In the early 1990s a batch of Lim aircraft (Polish-built MiGs) turned-up at AMARC (Davis Monthan’s desert boneyard). It turned out that these had been in the US for several years and had flown in OpFor threat scenario exercises. So where are the photos of these taken whilst they were flying and “in-service”? There are none that I know of, so does this mean it didn’t happen?

    Steve Rush

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 148 total)