dark light

Steve Rush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 148 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Help Needed #2571855
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Try the friendly people over at the Historic forum section, there are quite a few collectors of that sort of stuff there: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=4
    We are just a bunch of unfriendly weapon-happy militants hoping to see things blown up. We’re not helpful by any means, sorry ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Aren’t we all commie-loving, anti-American, europhile xenophobes too, Art?! Or were you just playing nice :diablo:

    in reply to: Lipesk Airshow June 2006 #2571968
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    The photographer who actually took these posted the URL link on the Photographic forum about a week ago at http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=59488

    I’m sure he would be pleased if any of you who appreciated his pictures and time went along to say a small ‘thank you’ ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2572002
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Su-27SM avionics? Hope that’s a misreporting- it would imply little more than Su-30MK2 avionics! The PESA radar should disqualify such a thing immediately.

    100% sure it’s an error, Vympel, but I will always post what the source reports rather than edit it myself………

    What are the upgraded avionics in the Su-24SM as compared to the Su-34? I was wondering if that wasn’t in fact the typo.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: What should the F-35 be named as? #2572052
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Tubby? What would you call the X-32 then?

    The X-32 already had a nickname amongst enthusiasts this side of the Pond: ‘Codpiece’.

    Any similarity between the shape of the X-32 and Larry Blackmon’s (of Cameo) stage attire was described as “completely coincidental” by a Boeing spokesperson :diablo:

    http://www.angryb.com/images/codpiece.jpg

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2572063
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Russian Plant Builds First Batch-Produced Su-34 Bomber

    Russian Plant Builds First Batch-Produced Su-34 Bomber

    Novosibirsk: The Novosibirsk-based Chkalov aviation production association [NAPO] has built the first batch-produced Su-34 fighter-bomber, NAPO has told Interfax-Sibir.

    “The work is going as planned,” the agency’s source said.

    As reported earlier, NAPO plans to build two Su-34 fighter-bombers by October-November of this year. It is planned that over three years NAPO will deliver 18 warplanes of this model to the Russian Defence Ministry (two in 2006, six in 2007 and 10 in 2007). Thereafter, NAPO plans to build eight to ten Su-34s a year.

    The Su-34 has been in development since the late 1980s. A pilot batch of eight planes has already been built. Starting from the eighth machine, the Su-34 will be equipped with avionics largely standardized with that of the modernized Su-27SM fighter.

    Source: Interfax-Sibir (30th June, 2006)

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    I think flex was talking about the Russian “atomic suitcase”, not the USA version.

    I understood it to be pretty much as he described, so maybe we were both misinformed ๐Ÿ˜‰

    http://www.fas.org/news/russia/1996/960901_01.htm

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Air Tattoo 2006 #2572929
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    though i have nothing againt Mig-29s, can the Ruskies send something over a bit more interesting.. like a Su-24, Mig-31 or Tu-22m3…

    It’s a question of finance really: The MiG-29 will be over for SBAC as they’re marketing it.

    a Polish Su-22 or Mig-23 in the flying display would be nice as well… ๐Ÿ˜‰

    The Polish Floggers have been out of service for 7 years, but it would be great to see a Fitter in the display, certainly.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: US Army selects the UH-145 #2572987
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    “Aren’t you mixing up the role of the ARH (Bell 407) and LUH talking about scout and recon?!”

    Well since it was stated that they were to replace OH-58A/C Kiowas,which aren’t really utility choppers.As far as being a Huey replacement,thats all good and fine but the Army has already been down this road before with the LTV/Aeropostale Panther 500.

    When do you think the US Army last used A and C model Kiowas for the scout mission?! It’s been the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior’s job for over 15 years now, and counting.

    Yes, they will be used to replace the Army National Guard’s Kiowas (OH-58A, OH-58A+ and OH-58C) which, these days, do little more than act as a platform for pilots to retain currency on choppers. The only regular and predictable role that the LUH should replace the Kiowa in is in terms of RAID operations (i.e. internal/state anti-narcotics work).

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: US Army selects the UH-145 #2573632
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    1) Go to the FAA site and type in any US civil registration mark carried by an ‘EC145’ and the result you’ll get will say BK117C2…..because that’s what it is and what it is certified as!

    2) These will mostly be used as Huey replacements (where using a UH-60 would be seen as overkill). Just about every single US state will have a couple for use of the Army Guard and in Homeland Defense duties.

    Aren’t you mixing up the role of the ARH (Bell 407) and LUH talking about scout and recon?!

    By the by, the French Securite Civile (as pictured) have sadly lost two of theirs to separate accidents in the Pyrenees already.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: US Army selects the UH-145 #2573719
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    If you care to check the constructor’s plate on an EC145 you’ll see it is still referred to as ‘BK117C2’ and, I believe, is licensed as such. Basically, this means that the designation EC145 is a stable name for Eurocopter commonality (i.e. read “marketing purposes ๐Ÿ˜‰ )

    It was explained to me by a rep when these first appeared with the EC145 designation that it was a combination of 75% BK117 with the front end taken from a one-off proof of concept protoype for an “all weather” chopper added.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    There have been a couple of news items published in the past couple of weeks or so which relate to engine developments and proposals:

    Russia Plans To Finalize Tests of Modernized Engine for Su-27, Su-30 Planes

    The official tests of the AL-31FM-1 air engine upgraded by the Moscow-based Salyut engineering company are going to end in July, the company’s Director General Yury Yeliseyev told Interfax-Military News Agency Wednesday.

    “No later than the end of July the final tests of the engine to propel Su-27 and Su-30 aircraft will be completed, with the Air Force acceptance certificate issued accordingly,” Yeliseyev said.

    According to him, Salyut has enough own funding to finalize the tests.

    “We believe that the in-service engines for the Russian Air Force will be subject to repairs with simultaneous upgrade provided into AL-31FM-1 versions. The expected rate is about 100 engines a year,” he added.

    “As for foreign clients, preliminary negotiations have been held, and many of them showed interest in both modernizing in-service engines and acquiring brand-new ones,” he said.

    According to him, the next-generation engine now under development may well use the technologies developed by Salyut in the course of the modernization, including the all-aspect nozzle with variable thrust vectoring, the control system, the three-stage low-pressure compressor and the new flame tube.

    “These solutions are sure to be introduced in the next generation engine,” he said.

    The modernization of the Al-31F engine for Sukhoi fighters is organized in three stages. Within the framework of the fifth-generation engine development process, Salyut is going to build three modifications of the engine, namely M1, M2 and M3. The M1 version will have thrust, more powerful than that of the predecessor by a tonne, and also the time between overhauls of 750 hours. The M2 version will feature a three-stage low-pressure compressor instead of the four-stage one, and have even greater thrust and service life. The thrust of the M3 is going to be raised by 29% as compared to the baseline configuration. Moreover, it will be the nearest modification to the fifth-generation engine.

    Source: Interfax-AVN (21st June, 2006)

    Sukhoi To Start Exporting Fighter Jets With New Engine In 2009

    Sukhoi Aviation Holding will start exporting fighter jets with a new engine, 117C, in 2009, a holding official told Itar-Tass on Friday.

    “Sukhoi has not only chosen an engine for the new export brand of Su-35, but also decided to co-invest in the project. It will fund 40% of the engine research and development costs,” he said.

    “A contract on funding research and development of the 117C engine was signed at a Moscow meeting of Sukhoi chief Mikhail Pogosyan, Saturn Scientific and Production Center head Yuri Lastochkin, and head of the Ufa Machine Building Center Alexander Artyukhov. The project will be complete by 2008,” he said.

    The project is testing technologies, which will be used in the development of a fifth-generation engine for Russian warplanes, the source said.

    117C is a profound modernization of AL-31F. It has a thrust of 14.5 tonnes,
    which is 2 tonnes larger than the basic engine.

    Source: Itar-Tass (9th June, 2006)

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Guys,

    am I missing something here? What actually is the “news”? The Rafales have been at St. Dizier flying with 1/7 for weeks now (since mid-April). The article in the first thread reads as though the unit took delivery of 20 jets: which simply isn’t true!

    Basically, there was an open day (portes ouvertes) on Tuesday afternoon to present Rafale to the public (and the Prime Minister).

    However, I did notice the following in one of the PDF files that Glitter kindly posted:

    The standard F2 takes up the standard F1โ€™s air-to-air functions, complemented with the use of the infrared Mica. The maturity of the standard is proven by the fact that as early as 26 June 2006, the first aircrafts of the fighter squadron 1/7 ยซ Provence ยป will be on the alert in Mont-de-Marsan for the active air security measures, reinforced since 11 September 2001.

    Now this is definitely a notable achievement worth marking, but there’s no mention of that in the item which kicks this thread off!!

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    p.s. by the way, as far as I know, EC 1/7 currently have four Rafale B aircraft (i.e those delivered in mid-April) and a pair of Rafale C. If anybody has an update to this then I’d be pleased to know too.

    in reply to: Portuguese Puma Request #2576503
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Mpacha,

    Just in case nobody comes up with any definitive answers for you (and there are a couple of posters here with good contacts in the Puma community), I think it might be worth your while going straight for the jugular and contacting OGMA in Portugal.

    Check out: http://www.ogma.pt/contact.htm

    Let us know how you get on ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Su-30s for Venezuela official with delivery in 2006 #2576712
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    There were more US pilots than NZ pilots fighting the Germans in RAF before US officaly declared war to Germany.

    Really?!

    Three ‘Eagle Squadrons’ as compared to numbers 75 and 485 to 490 Squadrons (i.e. seven in total) that were RNZAF under RAF control?

    I’d be amazed if there were more US personnel than RNZAF, especially as the ‘Eagle Squadrons’ didn’t only consist of American citizens.

    Steve Rush

    p.s. back onto the original topic of this thread for a moment :diablo: …….

    It has been confirmed that no contracts have yet been signed regarding any sale of Flankers to Venezuela.

    in reply to: Mi-28Ns to replace Mi-24s by 2015? #2576764
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Assuming 12 machines per year until 2010, the objective of 50 choppers is obviously doable. How many Mi-24s does Russia have in service at the moment?

    Vympel,

    the actual wording of the reports from statements made concerning the fielding of the Mi-28N was pretty ambiguous. In another press story it read more like the Mi-28N would replace regiments that are operating the Mi-24 in the North Caucusus by 2015……..

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 148 total)