dark light

Steve Rush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 148 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Some Flanker Doubts #2573184
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    The first five aicraft were delivered to the AF back in December 2003 (sort of a Christmas present.

    The plan was then for 11 aircraft to be upgraded in 2005 (I don’t know if any were upgraded in 2004) and for 6 to be upgraded in 2006, but what really happened was that all 17 were upgraded in 2005.

    So at this stage there’s at least 22 aircraft, possibly more.

    Kommersant- about the 17 Su-27SMs in 2005

    For what it’s worth, the 31st March edition of the Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda stated that a total of 17 Su-27SMs had been delivered so far.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Czech AF's SU-25s #2573205
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Bulgaria and Georgia still operate the Su-25. Recent reports suggest that the former Macedonian Su-25s (which were supplied by Ukraine) have also gone to Georgia, although I’ve yet to see any ‘concrete’ evidence to confirm this.

    As Minotaurus said, almost all of the Slovak Su-25s went to Armenia, but it’s still not entirely clear where some of the former Czech AF ones have finished-up: 6 or 7 were reported as sold to the USA but, as far as I’m aware, none have been seen in the States or appear on the FAA register……

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: HELLENIC AIR FORCE NEWS & DISCUSSION #2576427
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    I think this article on the 115th Wing’s F-16 Block 52+ operations has probably been around for a few months now, but I only became aware of it today when I saw the print issue of the magazine (LM’s Code One).

    http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives/2006/articles/jan_06/souda/index.html

    Definitely worth a read.

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Anyway no need to argue with someone who go so far as to to put words in your mouth to be able to reply to them.

    I’m out.

    No truer words spoken in this whole thread.

    sferrin, you’re arguing against points that were never raised in the first place.

    Where has anyone here, or in the GAO report that this thread is about, criticised the (to quote you) the “weapon system”?

    Perhaps it’s you that needs literacy and comprehension classes.

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    By the way both an AF spokesman and LMA spokesman have denied the 1 billion $ fix claim.

    Like I could care less how many of your tax dollars will be spent rectifying the problem.

    The point wasn’t the cost (we all know how the mainstream media love to pluck figures from thin air), but that people far more knowledgeable and better connected than you or I have severe doubts about the efficacy of the programme(s).

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Published today in the Fort Worth Star Telegram, written by Bob Cox:

    Now the Air Force, in an article published Monday by Defense News, has acknowledged that nearly all of the 100 or so F-22 fighters already built or in production may have serious defects that could require $1 billion in repairs.

    Air Force officials told the defense publication that in ongoing fatigue tests of the F-22 they have discovered that critical titanium parts where the wing and tail attach to the fuselage do not meet the design specifications for endurance.

    Lockheed is the prime contractor on the F-22 and F-35.

    The Pentagon’s former chief weapons tester, Philip Coyle, says the F-22 problems underscore the need to exhaustively test the F-35 before buying production models.

    Too many times, Coyle said, designs and systems “that looked just fine in the laboratory … don’t work at all” in operation.

    Steve Rush

    Steve Rush
    Participant

    In the words of general Fogleman

    It was the editor of the AFA’s on-line magazine that actually said that back in 1997, rather than Gen. Fogleman himself.

    Some of you seem surprised that the GAO are critical of DoD programmes. As Kovy said, that’s why the GAO exists and functions.

    I found it fairly surprising that, when the 129th F-35 rolls off the production line, less than 30% of the initial/planned flight testing programme will have been completed.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Syrian navy Mi-14 Haze pictures #2579811
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Sadly, the German Mi-14s are retired now.

    Something that I didn’t realise, until I saw them for myself at Rothenburg last August, was that four of them have been “civilianised” and given registrations for Sao Tome & Principe! From the logos on the side of one I think they were intended to be used as water bombers, but I got the impression these Mi-14s were fairly dormant and in a “stored” condition.

    I’m pretty sure the only Mi-14s still operating in Europe now are the Polish and Bulgarian ones. There should also be at least one active in Georgia.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: F-5 in R.O.C. Taiwan #2583560
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Loving these shots, Ryan Kuo, so please feel free to just keep ’em coming! 😀

    For any of you that haven’t seen the F-5 supplement that comes with May 2006’s AFM (the current issue) I would thoroughly recommend it.

    Best regards

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Mi-24 Hind #2583691
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Dear Steve.. In fact, I am pretty sure. The unusual Hind colors are only a matter of lighting conditions, you as a photographer surely know how different matt colors can look depending on just weather. I am posting pics of Polish helicopters with similar camo, even if probably not exactly the same machines.. Feel free to compare them and write down your comments.

    Cheers, Flex.

    I totally agree with everything you’ve said about colours and tones. It was only recently that I also noticed the huge disparity in colour definition between operating systems (Windows, Mac etc.) and monitors. The differences in some images is startling, especially if the tonal quality is high in the first place (hi-res scan or a digi pic from a good camera).

    I think you’re right now I took a look at the Hip pic too. I’d even go as far as to say that Hip was shot at Tomaszow Mazowiecki (the W-3 base) because the terrain and backdrop are identical to the photo.

    Looks like those marks may have been short-term only for the purposes of a LIVEX.

    Wow, great to hear that! Were you down in the basement level?
    *Jazz Club* is definitely the most famous bar in Kosice but I have to say it only falls second to the reopened *Boba Bar*. Now you got another reason to visit Kosice again!!! Please, ensure you have noticed me before, I am taking the first six rounds! (if you survive… ;))

    Yeah, we finally got chucked out of the basement at about 3:30am I think, and staggered back to our hotel near the station.

    The only problem with advance notice is that I had no idea we were going to be staying in Kosice that night! We’d all been to the airshow at Kecskemet that day and were on our way to Presov but had no real idea of how far we wanted to travel that evening. The new toll motorway in Hungary meant we got to Kosice in about half the time we had planned!

    I’m sure I’ll go back, especially after the work on the SlovAF museum is completed, so be prepared to get those drinks in! Maybe we can persuade Arthur along to join us: I know he has a penchant for Kosice Babes too :p

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Mi-24 Hind #2583794
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    Fourth one is Polish Mi-24D in adversary Northern Korean markings..

    I know it’s an old post, Flex, but I only just saw it today: are you sure that’s definitely correct? Only reason I ask is that I’ve seen all of the Polish Hinds (and photgraphed most) but don’t recall seeing one in that scheme or markings.

    Just curious as to the time period it carried those marks and where the info that it’s Polish came from really.

    Cheers

    Steve Rush

    p.s. enjoyed a pretty storming night down at the ‘Jazz Club’ in Kosice last June. Didn’t feel too great the next morning though 😎

    in reply to: Who has the coolest lookin' camo? #2584012
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    I can tell you Steve, the encounter took place off the Jervis Bay bombing range just south of where I live back in the late 70’s. No it’s not an OA-4M but a standard A-4M of the US navy.

    It wasn’t staged, the USN had to attack the range and the RAN had to defend and this one got bounced hard after being very sneaky and coming in very low and then trying to pop up high out of the main group. I read the account details some time ago.

    Ja, the A-4M (and OA-4M) were USMC birds, not Navy.

    What’s also strange about the pic is that Marine Corp jets were painted in hi-viz schemes (with huge Star & Bar on port wing, plus large Modex numbers on both) well into the 1980s, some even later.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Who has the coolest lookin' camo? #2584573
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    And just to rub in how good we are down here, here is a pic of a USN a-4 in the gunsite of an RAN A-4

    Isn’t that a USMC OA-4M though?

    If that’s really a RAN A-4G site I wonder where this encounter took place :confused: Any takers?!

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Central Asian Military Bases #2584728
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    ….but the talks with the US weren’t about “withdrawal”.

    Basically, Bakiyev wants to charge the US more rent for using Ganci AB. They haven’t agreed terms yet but withdrawal would probably only be the very worst case scenario.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if a compromise is reached by the date mentioned.

    Steve Rush

    in reply to: Central Asian Military Bases #2584787
    Steve Rush
    Participant

    the US and Russian bases are temporary. Kyrgyzstan has already express its intent to get the two out.

    Latest reports, from yesterday:

    Bishkek, 26 April: Negotiations on the US airbase at Bishkek airport should be completed by 1 June, Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev believes.

    “I said that negotiations on the US airbase at the Manas airport in Bishkek that have been going on for 10 months should not drag on. The issues could have been solved earlier if we had found a compromise with the United States,” Bakiyev said at a briefing in Bishkek on Wednesday [26 April].

    Speaking about the Russian airbase in Kant, the president said: “Kyrgyzstan is interested in increasing the Russian presence in Kant.”

    A Russian airbase is important in solving some issues of regional security, he said. “We are all concerned today about regional security. Drug trafficking by international terrorist groups threatens peace and stability in the Central Asian region. One should fight such challenges,” Bakiyev said.

    “The Kant airbase not only promotes the development of Russian-Kyrgyz military and technical cooperation, but also prepares Kyrgyz soldiers, and plays an important role in attracting Russian investments and in developing the social and economic infrastructure of the city of Kant,” the president said.

    Source: Interfax News Agency

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 148 total)