All,
Some off-topic posts have been removed, please try to stick to the subject.
Regards,
Webmaster
Fletcher Fund
We are in the process of setting up trust funds for Tom and Georgia. All donations will be appreciated, please send cheques to:
Fletcher Fund
PO Box 100
STAMFORD
Lincs PE9 1XQ
The Pay-Pal account is: FletcherFund [at] keypublishing.com https://www.paypal.com
The link to the fund page ishttp://www.composiclean.com/id31.html
If you have another way you’d like to help, please contact Dave at [email]FletcherFund@keypublishing.com[/email]
Regards,
Dave Unwin
Hi Bodeen
Drop me a pm with your email address and I will check it out. Also include the email address you are trying to send to.
Regards,
Webmaster
Hi Duncan,
Check you PM
Hi Duncan,
Check you PM
Dear all,
I have been discussing this with our advertising people and at this time there are no plans to provide this service on the forum. However if there are any updates I will keep you posted.
Regards,
Webmaster
My Traffic is very good but you might also want to have a look at the Scotflight Scenery
The throttle quadrant we did the review on was a early model. I will check with Saitek and see if they have done any design changes since then. Drop me an email to remind me in a few days if you havent heard from me.
Watch your language on here or the thread will be closed.
Webmaster
This post is from somebody who is not a part of the forum and wishes to remain anonymous. It appears here as a one-off contribution to the discussion;
————————————————————————
Staggered landings , like everything in formation flying , were designed to permit a number of aircraft to execute a given maneuver
in as short a time as possible . Since the transition from air to ground is one of the most dangerous phases of flight , landings in close formation are usually declined by even the most experienced . The next most expeditious method of getting a formation back on the ground is the ” break ” followed by the ” stream ” or ” staggered ” landing , wherein the formation provides its own separation between aircraft . The separation ( certainly where smaller types of aircraft is concerned ) is provided by two factors ,
lateral , and fore and aft . Lateral separation should be used only where the runway is sufficiently wide to permit an aircraft to pass the previous one with safe lateral clearance , i.e. the runway should be AT LEAST twice the minimum width required for safe operation of a single aircraft of the type . The first lands on the left side , the next on the right etc ., depending on crosswind . Effectively , two runways side by side . The fore and aft clearance behind the preceeding aircraft should be designed as sufficient to allow a pilot to avoid the one he is following no matter what happens , even should the other intrude onto ” his side ” of the runway , or alternatively , to apply power , lift off , and ” go around ” …. while avoiding that aircraft . Stream landings on a narrow ( single ) runway should be arranged so that an aircraft touches down just as the preceeding aircraft turns off at the far end.
If the runway is too narrow , a number of possibilities arise . One aircraft may not be able to pass another without collision . Loss of , or even poor directional control means that an aircraft may either leave the runway surface or veer into the path of the follower . Both dangerous . If the fore and aft separation is too short , the follower may not have sufficient time to react and avoid the preceeding
machine should a problem occur , or , given the forward view problems of ” tail draggers ” , may not see it in time . Following too closely , no matter how wide the runway , just invites disaster . The possibilities are exactly the same as driving a ground vehicle at high speed . If the guy in front of you has a problem , available reaction time is often too small to avoid collision.
All,
Annie, Keith’s wife asked me to post the following message on the forum on her behalf.
Regards
Webmaster
———————————————-
To all Flypast Forum users, it is with great sadness that ‘ Dambuster’ Keith Jones, my husband is no longer with us. He took ill suddenly on 27th January and suffered a brain haemorrhage, he was rushed to the best hospital in London but the operation did not work, it was so severe. He died on 29th January. He will be a great loss to all aircraft enthusiasts, with his knowledge that he built up from a very early age. As the saying goes ‘ if you can’t beat them, then join them’, so I worked with him on ‘Sally B’. We have been helping out for the last 25yrs, I will still continue to do this. He was also very much into 617 squadron as well.
My work colleague has told me about the messages on your website so far, please pass on my grateful thanks to all those who have contributed.The funeral is taking place in Sittingbourne Kent on 18th February, if anyone wishes further information, then they can contact me on Scampton617 at aol.com
Annie
Any of you that have had problems with subscriptions, can you email me direct at [email]webmaster @ keypublishing.com[/email] or in case of PC Pilot email me at [email]mail @ pcpilot.net[/email] and I will follow it up with the subs department.
Cheers
Webmaster
Any of you that have had problems with subscriptions, can you email me direct at [email]webmaster @ keypublishing.com[/email] or in case of PC Pilot email me at [email]mail @ pcpilot.net[/email] and I will follow it up with the subs department.
Cheers
Webmaster
I dont have much experience of Thrustmaster, but if I had to choose between tha CH and Saitek controller I would go for the X52 as it both feels more substantial and has more features.
Similarly in my opinion the Saitek Pro pedals both look and feel better than the CH pedals. The Saitek unit also has a friction a friction knob to adjust the weight of the pedals.
Hope this helps
Gents
Keep it civil.
Thanks
Webmaster