dark light

How Low Can You Go??

Cracking write up and the photos are quite good………… 😀 😀

Low level over the sand

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

152

Send private message

By: Baldeagle - 24th February 2006 at 16:36

It’s an Aero Commander, good stuff.
I’ve never done any low flying, myself…..

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 24th February 2006 at 14:57

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQpVI_aldB0

Bob Hoover in a Piaggio (?) enjoy!

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 23rd February 2006 at 08:31

An old friend in South Africa gave the brief on water skiing. He does it in a Cub. The recommended technique is to approach the water at normal flight speed with the BRAKES ON, touch down as for a wheeler and apply a little forward stick to maintain a level attitude and there you have it. Simple he says, nothing to it, first time is the worst. On a large lake, he says, you can do flat turns with the rudder but must keep wings level.

Frankly I think to whole business is utter lunacy and if there were to be an incident then the likely repercussions would be appalling both from the insurance and the “endangering” aspects.

Cheers,

Trapper 69

Very true. Water, when approached at speed is very hard, but also usually not flat; a swell ar a big enough chop or wave, or wake from another vehicle in or one the water could very easily undo you. Still the risk-aversion attitudes of display pilots is usually interesting! 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

458

Send private message

By: Skybolt - 23rd February 2006 at 08:24

An old friend in South Africa gave the brief on water skiing. He does it in a Cub. The recommended technique is to approach the water at normal flight speed with the BRAKES ON, touch down as for a wheeler and apply a little forward stick to maintain a level attitude and there you have it. Simple he says, nothing to it, first time is the worst. On a large lake, he says, you can do flat turns with the rudder but must keep wings level.

Frankly I think to whole business is utter lunacy and if there were to be an incident then the likely repercussions would be appalling both from the insurance and the “endangering” aspects.

Cheers,

Trapper 69

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,265

Send private message

By: Skyraider3D - 23rd February 2006 at 08:02

Wasn’t there a case once of a fish strike on an airliner? Something with a bald eagle dropping a salmon I believe 🙂

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

42

Send private message

By: Elwyn - 23rd February 2006 at 01:55

…or have a big fish jump into the prop 😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,265

Send private message

By: Skyraider3D - 23rd February 2006 at 00:55

You do NOT want to sneeze when doing that! 😀

Here’s the relevant topic with some amazing pics:
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6462

It’s a disaster waiting to happen though… :rolleyes:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,892

Send private message

By: trumper - 22nd February 2006 at 20:55

Is that real?, ahh ahhh ahhhhhh CHOOOOOO, WHOOPS,Splash

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 22nd February 2006 at 20:43

My God! 😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,488

Send private message

By: Propstrike - 22nd February 2006 at 20:10

Check this out!!! See thread on WIX for more (Warbird Information Exchange)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 15th February 2006 at 00:53

Actually it’s not a The Aeroplane magazine photo, it is credited to Flight in the publication I got it from. There is also a cutaway below oit of the Anson also credited to Flight, as are all the other RAF photos in the 1938 airshow programme.

Can someone tell me please when did The Aeroplane and Flight each first go on public sale?

That’s the problem with trying to work from memory late (or early!) :rolleyes:

Flight & Aeroplane share photos at a couple of stages of their history, I can say in my defence, and it’ll now be in Aeroplane’s archives I think…

In answer to your question Dave, 1911 – 1968 for Aeroplane, acording to the current magazine’s title page. Flight I neither know (nor care… 😉 )

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,847

Send private message

By: Dave Homewood - 14th February 2006 at 20:46

It’s an Aeroplane (the 1930s version of the mag, like Flight) photo
HTH

Actually it’s not a The Aeroplane magazine photo, it is credited to Flight in the publication I got it from. There is also a cutaway below oit of the Anson also credited to Flight, as are all the other RAF photos in the 1938 airshow programme.

Can someone tell me please when did The Aeroplane and Flight each first go on public sale?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

26

Send private message

By: Paulish - 14th February 2006 at 13:27

Mirages in Africa?

Apologies if these have been referenced before-these guys are low………

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-4787.html

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,057

Send private message

By: adrian_gray - 14th February 2006 at 12:07

Charles Sims was the Aeroplane photographer – here is one of his photos scanned from his excellent (but too slim!) volume “Camera in the Sky”

Meant to post that one myself but never did…

What scares me is that an awful lot of cameras back then had waist-level viewfinders (think Rolleiflex). So if he was using oneof those then that axle isn’t below his EYEline, it’s below his WAISTLINE! 😮

Off for a lie-down to get over thinking about it…

Adrian

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

334

Send private message

By: sconnor - 14th February 2006 at 12:01

PL965, if I’m not mistaken. Am I right in thinking one of the Hannas is in command there?

Wonderful 🙂

You are correct!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,888

Send private message

By: Papa Lima - 14th February 2006 at 11:40

It’s a pleasure, James!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 14th February 2006 at 11:38

Thanks Papa, and for your other recent posts. What would I do without you! 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 14th February 2006 at 11:27

😮

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,888

Send private message

By: Papa Lima - 14th February 2006 at 11:21

Gloster Gnatsnapper

Charles Sims was the Aeroplane photographer – here is one of his photos scanned from his excellent (but too slim!) volume “Camera in the Sky”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 14th February 2006 at 11:12

I’m assuming ti’s Finnish – the swatztikas were what made me suspect (and it’s prewar so not captured).

Bit o’ info here.

It’s a shot taken in in the UK in the 30s, pre-delivery to the Finns.

It’s an Aeroplane (the 1930s version of the mag, like Flight) photo – can’t remember who (Russell something?) but they used to do this quite a lot. The photog would stand in the middle of the field and they’d fly the aircraft around him, or over him, or at him…

The Finns marking is strictly not a ‘Swastika’ but it has a different name. Ummm. Can’t remember. The Finns marking is pale blue and ‘stands on the flat side’ while the Nazi symbol was usually black and always ‘stood on the corner’. The problem with identifying them is the vast amount of inaccurate allied caricatures and spoofs, so the simplicity of the Swastika is lost.

HTH

1 38 39 40 41 42 61
Sign in to post a reply