dark light

baloffski

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 206 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1060331
    baloffski
    Participant

    There were a few Tornado jets which were fitted with Structural Usage Monitoring System which was essentially a big bunch of strain gauges all over the wings and fin which fed data into a cassette tape changed after every landing.

    The training film for this system opened with the footage of the Vulcan break up which led to a section on the probable cause, which if memory serves, was due to a large section of the leading edge failing peeling back and causing catastrophic structural failure of the wing.

    Obviously the accident investigation techniques were not as advanced in those days; but the implication was that a lot of high speed runs and ‘sporty’ displays of the aircraft had resulted in minute fatigue cracks in the leading edges which had joined up and essentially uinzipped a rivet line. This was the start in a sequence of events which resulted in the horrific crash.

    Anecdotal evidence suggests that the bare metal finish applied to high performance jets was to allow easier inspection of rivet lines etc. and also fitting of fatigue meters and the fatigue indexing process were all introduced following this accident.

    in reply to: Phantom XV409 to be scrapped – RAF Mount Pleasant #1065617
    baloffski
    Participant

    Good point! Why scrap it if it is offending somebody…..just tow it away from the terminal! :rolleyes:

    Are there many Argentine visitors to the Falklands? Is there a direct air-link?

    I can understand that the Argentine relatives of those killed during the 1982 conflict who are visiting their graves may be upset but is this aircraft really the problem?

    What would offend any Argentinians more, a dead aircraft parked outside the air terminal or landing at probably the biggest UK Military Base we have overseas? Do we close MPA?

    in reply to: Phantom XV409 to be scrapped – RAF Mount Pleasant #1067039
    baloffski
    Participant

    Last time I was down there it looked in good nick and well cared for by the lads on 1435 and I would be very surprised if it had become unsafe since 2007.

    Given that the 30th anniversary of the war is next year and Flt Lt Wales is going down at about that time, I would be surprised if they were scrapping it this year. I can imagine that the Islanders would be a bit miffed and if it was definitely not to remain in front of the terminal, it would not surprise me at all if it had the wings folded and towed down the road into Stanley.

    There is a bloke down there who gives the most outstanding history talks I have ever attended and if I remember rightly he was very active in preserving anything to do with the islands pre or post ’82, so I would imagine there would be a campaign to keep it in some way shape or form.

    Nothing in this weeks Penguin News, but I will be watching it closely over the next few weeks for the story.

    in reply to: Avro 748 Sisyphus Safe And Secure At Liverpool #1054948
    baloffski
    Participant

    Jon H should be along shortly to share some news, but as he has just managed to get himself engaged, it may be a wee while while the enormity of his good lady finally saying yes sinks in!

    What I can say though, is that while the pace has been slowed by the pace of the admin burden involved, the project is very much alive and progressing. Jon and the rest of the troops at SAHG have been working like one legged bait diggers to get her to Liverpool and properly cared for as soon as possible.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1064291
    baloffski
    Participant

    Anyone got any ideas what this is?

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Thorn-Threshold-Control-Panel-/200657050754?pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item2eb8179c82#ht_500wt_1202

    ‘Threshold Control’ kind of says it may be something to do with Blind Landing Trials perhaps as in runway threshold?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1082029
    baloffski
    Participant

    10 H was the seat fitted to early Sea Harrier, Tornado was 10 A.

    Tonka seats were mounted on three wheel trolleys which were guaranteed to be in the way, wherever the plumbers left them in the Hangar and always seemed to have flat tyres!

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1050164
    baloffski
    Participant

    I take it that there is nothing in the Leading Particulars of the 700? (“Granny get in here – there is eggs to be sucked”)

    Or as a real long shot, do you have access to the BDR manual as that lists alternatives; but they could be for ‘one trip – war goer’ only use.

    Thanks for putting the link up for the online Shell Book and I am a confirmed saddo, as I was right about OM15, pretty much right on the grease and I will spend a happy hour or so later on reading through, while the Long Haired Sgt Maor watches Haemmorhoid Farm and Constipation St.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #1050690
    baloffski
    Participant

    In my time as a global megastar on the workhorse of the RAF, I used to carry the Shell Handbook in my nav bag which gave AeroShell equivalents of all NATO numbered POL Products. It also told me where the Shell Card was taken for fuel.

    They were as rare as rocking horse wossits so I handed mine on to one of the lads coming through the school when I left, as they are invaluable when you are downroute in oomigooley land and you need to talk civvy not RAF.

    Now sad beggar I am, I remember that OM15 relates to AeroShell 41 (but make sure it is the superclean version) and XG 293 is AeroShell 23 C or it might have been CF.

    If you can get your hands on one of these beauties your problems will be lessened as you can get the AeroShell equivalents a lot cheaper, I have even seen the 5 litre tins of 23C for sale on fleabay.

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Identify The Engine . . . #1056978
    baloffski
    Participant

    And the clincher was as they say staring me in the face. The phonic wheel just in front of your lad’s hands and the remnants of the NL Pulse robe in the exhaust diffuser could only be RB199.

    It has taken some sort of a severe walloping though, are they bird remains all through it?

    in reply to: Identify The Engine . . . #1056996
    baloffski
    Participant

    Definitely a bypass engine, RB199?

    The one piece intermediate casing with machining marks has the Module 16 mount/drive in about the right place. It also has the engine mounting pins of the right type and in the right place. The Boroscope Access points look very similar to Turbo Union standard items and from many hours doing 25 hour checks are in the right places if I remember rightly.

    One thing is for sure though, if he turned up for duty in those denims on a shift I ran he would have been in for a flea in his ear! Going for the patent leather look is all well and good (and it keeps the rain out after a while) but unless he has a No Dhobi chit off the MO he would be off to the NAAFI for a box of Daz!

    in reply to: Sqn Numberplates #1067696
    baloffski
    Participant

    Not me Guv. (But I know a man that can!)

    in reply to: Sqn Numberplates #1069012
    baloffski
    Participant

    I have heard from a reliable source that the following changes are going to be made to RAF Sqn Numberplates:

    IV(R) Sqn will be re-equipped with Hawk T2 – 19 Sqn to Disband

    10 Sqn will be the first Voyager Sqn

    XIII Sqn will re-equip with Reaper

    14 Sqn will re-equip with Shadow R1

    42(R), 55(R), 111, 120 and 201 plus a lot of existing Reserve Sqns will disband

    51 Sqn will be re-equipped with Rivet Joint/ Airseeker

    70 Sqn will get the A400M

    Still no definite news on No1 Balloon Company RE although it looks likely they will be the first F35 Sqn. The hole in the wall gang are of course safe until Tornado goes, but that possibly only gives them 6 and a bit years, so what then? Could one possibly become the Reds shadow Sqn?

    in reply to: Victors and Valiants rapid start ? #1071188
    baloffski
    Participant

    The Combustor starter on the Victor was, as I recall, essentially a tube which had high pressure air out of the bottles and fuel forced in at one end, lit and the expanding gases coming out of the other were used to start the engine.

    As you can imagine these got flippin’ hot in use and so had a lagging jacket fitted to them.

    These jackets used to get soaked in oil and I was on quite a few Ground Runs on Victor Servicing Flight when you could see them start to smoulder a bit after they were used.

    Robert Hilton will be able to tell you a lot more – I just remember him giving me the fire extinguisher off the Land Rover ‘just in case’; as we would want to keep the 10Kg CO2 bottle for a real fire.

    in reply to: RAF Out Of Leuchars (But Staying At Lossiemouth)! #1086827
    baloffski
    Participant

    What about moving the two jets from Leuchars (is there a Tornado F3 still there too?), the Javelin off the gate at Leeming, finding a Meteor, a Vampire and a plastic Spit and Hurri and then building a National Air Defence Museum somewhere?

    Other exhibits could include a Bloodhound and a Rapier to keep the cloud punchers happy.

    What do you think? Where could it go?

    in reply to: Jet engines #1035883
    baloffski
    Participant

    Should’ve tried the up rated version – the Ghost Teasmaid!

    I always prefered the goblin version as she could have tidied the house up after…..

    Indeed the RAF made use of Derwents after their flying time was over – in the form of the well-known MRD Snow Removal vehicles attached to Bowsers.. 😉

    If you have a look here you can read my thoughts on the piggin’ things:

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=108590

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 206 total)