dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2042172
    matt
    Participant

    you said in your post hi-hi could have a higher range so explain what hi-hi is.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2042180
    matt
    Participant

    Matt dude , atleast the published range of Brahmos is

    Lo-Lo — 120 – 130 KM
    Hi-Lo — 290-300 km
    Hi-Hi Range of Brahmos would certainly be higher than 290 Km

    Hi hi? you mean like a balistic missile? Then why not just use a BALLISTIC MISSILE?

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2042185
    matt
    Participant

    depends mainly on the flight path and speed i doubt its true range will ever be released.

    What?
    your joking arent you? you think that the missile will suddenly increase from a 300KM range missile to a 1000km by changing its speed and flight?? The engine is designed to be efficient at its cruise speed!

    Please stop with the wishful day dreams of what they may or may not disclose.. The range in the literature is the range it has unless and until they publish officially a higher range.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2042319
    matt
    Participant

    Its fairly simple to increase the propellant/fuel levels in the missile, so its 300KM for everyone on the export list but probally 1000KM for India / Russia

    extra 700km? and where would they get a such a massive hike from?

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2077910
    matt
    Participant

    why are they buying crappy hawks.. please stop proping BAe up they are a useless dinosaur

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2078030
    matt
    Participant

    Its a case of IN needing them to have a Submarine force at all.. already these are coming in later then they should have.
    And i really doubt that they would be that much more advanced then the agustas that PN has.

    in reply to: Is now a good time to buy a 2nd-hand digital SLR? #466554
    matt
    Participant

    I was wrong Canon did call it the 5D lol oh well.

    Still way to expensive for me to buy :'(

    in reply to: Two new SLR's from Canon #466558
    matt
    Participant

    never did print or developing work so wouldnt know about the problems.
    But to be honest I do have more fun with my TLR’s and they do make street photography a lot easier.

    in reply to: Two new SLR's from Canon #466560
    matt
    Participant

    I basically got told that if i dont have file sizes that are 35MB or upwards i can forget about selling any of my prints! (i have a lot of non av work).

    So yeah digital is great if you can affords the £20K digital backs or the Pro digital SLRS. Other wise Medium format and 35mm still rock the roost.

    Has national geographic started to accept digital yet? i think they want 35MB’s too.

    Dont get me wrong i use a 300D, Lubital 166U and a Yashica Mat so i do use both. And most of my gallery does have digital but i have found film to be more fun.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News and Discussion #2080396
    matt
    Participant

    India secretly building nuclear submarine

    By Khalid Hasan

    WASHINGTON: India is building a nuclear submarine secretly, but it should do so openly as it is not breaking any laws, according to a retired admiral of the Indian Navy.

    Admiral Raja Mohan told a meeting at the Brookings Institution on Thursday afternoon that India needs to come clean on this secret project and the United States should extend an assurance that If India owns up to it, there will be no adverse reaction from Washington.

    Mohan was speaking on the emerging defence and security relationship between the US and India, in particular with reference to the recent agreement on nuclear cooperation between the two countries. He said India has the ability to outstrip China in the production of plutonium but has no plans to do so.

    Turning to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement announced when the Indian Prime Minister visited Washington, he said domestic opposition to the deal in both countries will need to be satisfied. This is one issue on which the ultra right in America and the ultra left in India are in accord. It will be for the leaders of the two countries to set the pace.

    He suggested the establishment of a high-level panel which should have the authority to cut through inter-agency wrangling that is sure to accompany the implementation process. He argued that the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) has flagged and the Indo-US deal will invigorate it. It will be better to get India “into the tent” rather than leave it out, he added.

    Asked if the Indo-US nuclear agreement opens the door for Pakistan to seek a similar arrangement with Washington, he replied that Pakistan would have to demonstrate a “clean record” for at least 10 years. As of now, nobody would take Islamabad very seriously.

    Mohan, asked about Pakistan’s cruise missile test, said it was in January 1999 that Pakistan started work on this programme, but the test firing at this particular time is “coincidental.” He said Pakistan’s Shaheen II missile is without doubt of Chinese make. As for Pakistan’s cruise missile, it would have to be asked how a country with only 150 PhDs has made a cruise missile.

    The meeting arranged by Stephen Cohen, head of the Asia Programme at Brookings, was attended by a number of experts, including Michael Krepon. HE asked Mohan what the Indo-US nuclear cooperation deal had for the US.

    Cohen said both the left and the right in America would be opposed to the deal.

    Krepon said the Indo-US ties would weaken the Nuclear Suppliers Group and acquisition of nuclear materials would be easier for Pakistan. The bad news for Pakistan is that one area where it competes with India is nuclear and the expansive relationship envisaged by the agreement between India and the US will put India ahead. He was critical of the agreement as it would leave India to decide what is military and what is civilian in its nuclear programme. He also said that in the past India has been secretive about its nuclear programme, so the question arises: why should America trust India now?

    from the daily times

    in reply to: More news on the carrier (China) #2080730
    matt
    Participant

    Anybody up for a carrier?

    Yeah sure.. is that a new drinking game?

    in reply to: hms invincible…for sale?…to who? #2081366
    matt
    Participant

    AAh i was wondering why the vince was still in port when i saw it on the fast cat.

    it did a nice salute during cowes week.

    in reply to: Pakistan test-fires first ground-launched cruise missile #2043409
    matt
    Participant

    Please read this first, –

    Copyright © Vijainder K Thakur. May not be reproduced without explicit written permission

    SOURCE (BABUR missile analysis)
    http://kuku.sawf.org/Articles/2111.aspx

    -Mod

    It is interesting how you have only posted the first article which may or may not have any truth to it but have not posted any of the rebuttles.

    in reply to: All 7 Russians rescued #2081693
    matt
    Participant

    Well maybe I don’t pay much attention but lets face it if the Yanks did something great or the Russians or the Indians or anybody else then their own news agencies would also make something of it and nobody would bat an eyelid. I suppose being Brits we are not allowed to or something :rolleyes: .

    Phil 🙂

    haha morning mate !

    well i just said the bbc did it i never said we arent allowed to do it 😉

    in reply to: All 7 Russians rescued #2081729
    matt
    Participant

    “But i am suprised that private firms were not asked to rescue the guys i am sure their are some that own dsrv’s”

    The Russians did this before with the Norwegians during the Kursk debacle. However, having recently spoken with some of those Norwegian lads who were involved I guess both the Russians and private firms might be very cautious about going down that route again. The Russians tried to “claim the glory” (perhaps not the best word to chose with the Kursk 🙁 ) by covering over the Norwegian private firm’s logo on the recovery video with one of their own logos, thus trying to make out a “big deal” to their own nation that they had done more than they actually had done! Blackcat, the Russians are just as good, if not worse in this case, by actually falsely claiming to their own people about their apparent efforts – at least the British efforts were genuine!! 😡
    Skipper

    Norwegian? really it thought it was an american company which sent rescue equipment to help the kursk wasnt it KBR/Halliburton that did the work?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,292 total)