How can any aircraft be a cold war relic?
Idiots.. i can understand obsolete techonology etc etc..but cold war relic?
and even then its not obsolete at all.
what did congress intend to do during the cold anyway? have a special button in the cockpit labbled.. “KILL OR COMMIES” ?? did they develope special software so that people would walk away from “Peace, Bread and land” and go towards ” fries burger and hold the anoying Clown” ?
considering the money will go back into the USA, and will help fund R&D for another few years, I dont see the point in complaining..the money will just go straight back into the US economy and this program will help other programs in the future..
Well its the only thing close enough 🙁
and they have the F-4 and some warbirds i love, i am looking forward to the Duxford museum visit and the new American hanger with the B52D the SR 71 and the A-10.. 🙂 yes i know A-10 but i like it, its over engineered and it just has character..
Thank you Franck 🙂
here are the possibilities at Hendon..
Cheers
got my self a Minolta Z2 in the end, i dont have a big budget i loved the cams that LN strike eagle showed but they were a bit steap ..
Planing to go to the RAF musean in London , and then Duxford as soon as i can and try it out..prolly wont show here since its aircraft u guys have probably seen to boredome..
no airbase where i am now, kinda wish i was back near Farnborough, atleast i could snap the Chinooks and the B-52’s
How can anyone say that having the most complex piece of Sorftware code with millions of lines is good to have on a aircraft which is constantly being bombarded by em, Cosmic rays etc etc.
well if u want to compare aircraft by the lines of code they hold, then give me a light aircraft with a laptop acting as a flightbag..that would win hands down, it would have windows XP, any flight management software, plus Charts..plus Solitaire
how much of a influence are these guys?
Islamists slam Pakistan’s non-NATO ally status
18/03/2004 at 14:11:53
Date line: ISLAMABAD
Islamist opposition here slammed a US plan to grant Pakistan “major non-NATO ally” status for its role in the war against terror, saying Thursday it would make the country a “client state.”
“I will be very unhappy if Pakistan is inching towards this alliance with the US,” Khurshid Ahmad, vice president of the main fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) party, told AFP.
“This is neither an honour, nor a step towards global security. We have to avoid becoming a mercenary and a client state,” Ahmad said.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell announced at a news conference in Islamabad Thursday that President George W. Bush would soon designate Pakistan a “major non-NATO ally” as a reward for its anti-terror support.
The announcement came as Pakistani troops unleashed their second major assault this week on Al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters near the border with Afghanistan.
The designation means Pakistan will join an exclusive club of nations — including Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Kuwait, New Zealand, South Korea, Thailand and the Philippines, which are given preferential treatment in the areas of foreign aid and defense cooperation.
“I don’t think this as a reward, it is a new trap after, luckily, we withdrew ourselves from the previous US alliances during the Cold War era,” Ahmad said.
Hasnat Qadri, spokesman for the moderate Jamiat Ulema Pakistan (JUP), a key member of six-party Islamist grouping, said the new role will be “dangerous for Pakistan’s military.”
“By entering into such alliance, Pakistani soldiers will be made US mercenaries,” Qadri said. “Muslims will be used against Muslim countries by the US.”
But ruling party Senator and political analyst Mushahid Hussain said the new status would increase the level of satisfaction in Pakistan amid concerns over growing defence cooperation between its rival India and Israel.
“Pakistan is a valued ally for the US and the new status signifies that there is a strong long-term strategic relationship between the two countries.”
Powell unveiled the decision despite US concerns over a nuclear proliferation scandal involving father of Pakistan’s nuclear programme, Abdul Qadeer Khan.
Hussain said that US concerns over nuclear proliferation in Pakistan would not affect the new relationship.
Defence analyst Talat Masood also said the move raised Pakistan’s status as an ally of the United States.
Pakistan has been chosen for this new role “because there is convergence of national and military interests as the two countries are now partners in the war against terrorism,” Masood, a retired Pakistani army general, told AFP.
Originally posted by PLA
J10 was PS and J10 would never become more then a paper fighter. The reality is that LCA is a never ending development and Arjun or other missile projects are dead. It sounds like wishing others a bad time and you will get is more trouble while others will have happy time. But I have to add that I do admire India. Maybe there are two religions dividing them thanks to the Brittish management quality but I do believe in working together. There is no second option.
:confused: huh?
please explain to us what you mean.
isnt the arjun in production?
arent the brahmos, agni, agni 2, and prithvi a hit so to speak?
Didnt i read in the recent afm that the LCA will have a intial production run starting next year?
Originally posted by mavaustin
and who said J-10 is a photoshoped myth:rolleyes:
It still is a myth, untill the specs are out , and its seen combat like all other aircraft its still a myth..atleast its capabilities are
Originally posted by PRC4eva
but the MiG–29 IS a failure because it operates on that s ystem.. its hardware is designed to operate on that system..what more can you get from a fighter with very limited range, poor look down shoot down, etc. Even if she Germans didn’t operate it with restraints of GCI..the MiG-29 had a whole lot of limited capapbilities.
as for the J-10..no one is stoppping you from criticiizing it, best you make a new thread for it though. 🙂
It was designed to operate in that system, but it does not mean the Aerodynamics or the avionics were complete failures.
Far from it…
The Avionics did the job that was required from it and the Aerodynamics did more then that.
Limited range? why how? what do you consider limited range? If the J-10 can fly from anywhere in China to a US airbase bomb it and come back on its own fuel without ifr then its good right? other wise it sucks?
I think the Mig dirivitive.. hmm sorry i mean the J-x prob operates on that GCI system.
Originally posted by Crusader
What about the V-22………:rolleyes:
+ Comanche + Stryder (bleh well come on replacing tanks with this joke?)
Junk the F/B 22 and go in for the YF-23



Cant the USAF bring the YF-23 back from the dead as a bomber? Why redesign to a F/B-22 when you have a huge aircraft with better performance already waiting in the ranks ?
Please go to
http://search.nasa.gov/nasasearch/search/search.jsp
And do a search for hypervelocity impacts, and debri
yes a anti sat weapon which directs particles at sat’s would be more damaging but their are enough stones, pellets, shards etc (you name it ) to make it pretty inhospitable already.
Originally posted by Billy Bishop
Then there must be lots of acts of war against the US, because Russia and China both have satellites whose specific purpose is countermeasures against other satellites, and I’m sure the US has satellites which do the same. For example the Russians have satellites capable of dispersing high velocity particles and other satellites get destroyed when they collide into these particle clouds.
LOL have you looked at how much natural hypervelocity debri is already in ORBIT ?
The particles are already their, Atomic Oxygen amongst others.
:confused:
oki all the notams ive seen are civilians with a few fire exercises or oceonography ones (indian navy) but ive not seen any like this.
is this the same type of notam that gets given to civil aviation?