THey would have to replace the pitot tubes..wasnt their a case like this with the RAF? and some IDIOT doing chin ups on the Probes of a RAF aircraft?
AESA wouldnt need much of a nose, its not gonna move mechanically..
no its not bent, its guiding the aircraft you see, its like a nose that smells the enemy, stealthy featcher…
Of all the aircraft to superimpose why choose this ugly duckling?
Indian , hi, India might have those puppies because she did not have other choices, who knows, but the club has be around for some time now, and i am sure countermeasures for it are out their. If the seeker head and corresponding electrogimickary is not upto the task then their is no obvious point in a high speed Mach 2+ missile, iirc EM waves are faster then sound so against jammers and such i doubt the Velocity would have a big effect.
Just wondering if the club can be launched from the air.
Ohh arent they the professional camera’s?
oki what are peoples opinions on the Milnolta Dimage Z1.
Isnt their an Tomahawk variant for shipping?
What about the First Ever airlaunched anti shipping missile? oki so only a 6mile range but still it worked. 😀
What Camera’s are used in these pics? i have seem images from digi cams and the images arent as crisp or vivid as the ones that are posted on the pegasis forum or on the SAAB website. could you please advise?
I want to get a new cam, for RIAT, Farnborough and such..but not big budget.. and would like some information from you guys.
Cheers
p.s
ofcourse the pics (if good) would be posted here first.. webmaster allowing.
France’s Dassault mulls plans to make electric cars with India’s Tata
Date line: BOMBAY
The car manufacturing arm of French aerospace giant Dassault Aviation is mulling plans to manufacture an electric car with India’s leading automobile company Tata Motors, an industry official said Thursday.
Dassault’s Societe Des Vehicules Electriques (SVE) is exploring options of either setting up a joint venture firm in India or entering into a technology transfer arrangement with Tata Motors, said an official close to the negotiations.
“Very preliminary and nascent discussions have taken place between Dassault’s SVE and the chairman of Tata Motors Ratan Tata,” the official said.
Tata spokesman V. Krishna said his firm did “not wish to comment on this.”
SNIP__read the rest at defence aero
~~~
Dont linch me.. its even on Defence Aerospace.. and Dassault is a defence company so its defence related.
~~~
Defence Aerospace .com
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Matt, Pakistan has frozen its defence spending, India has had year on year increases, so you lose on this arguement as well….bad luck!
Sorry did i bring India into this some place? :confused:
*checks the map.. hmmm i guess UK is a Indian territory , no wait hmm thats strange…:confused:
Originally posted by PLA
Mat… UK did go all the way to the Maldivas and defended some silly islands. Do look at the costs of EF2000 and other BA projects…When it come s to last defence there are allways options. Like one of Pakistans elected premier…. When it comes to defence they would even eat grass… India would do the same.
And these missiles are painted not extremely nice… When will they hire belgian artists…?
And what percent of the GDP are those BA projects? and how much of THOSE BA PROJECTS, is the government funding? Please read around. Cheers!
I think the 200KT is the yield of the warhead, so i guess, its the same effect as 200KT TNT..
A simple unit conversion should do the trick..wait ill do it.
200KT US to Kg’s is
181436948 Kg’s
Originally posted by GarryB
That same investment in time and money and focus would be better spent on developing an EM system or a simpler powder based system.
That is a cool Idea, and not strange either, since the technology is sooo different, you do not really need to develope a steam cat then a EM cat. no point in it.
Would a EM cat be only possible on nuclear aircraft carriers?
Garry , thanks for clearing up the powder confusion i had. just one more question. would it not be simpler to employ a Rocket assisted take of system? i mean just have rocket pellets instead of explosives..
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Matt. defence spending EVERYWHERE has an effect on socila aspects, its called opportunity cost, yes, I am aware of it, and it happens to India, but lets stick to the topic! Pakistani missile and nuke superiority!
Yes it does have an effect, EVERYWHERE!, hence we here in the UK have been cutting defence spending even though as percentage of GDP it is already relatively low..UK’s Economy is larger then pakistans and the government is still doing cuts, now please tell me how Pakistan (social and civil) with its smaller economy and higher %GDP spending on defence would be effected in the same way.
How many Shaheen 2 have been manufactured thus far?
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Matt
Stop flaming and go somewhere else! No one said that Pakistan could survive a full soviet onslaught, (bet you would have loved that to happen though), but when the sovs did try and bomb Pakistani territory we gave to use a term, “a befitting reply!” 🙂
You call that flaming? :confused:
And why would i care if the Soviets bombed you or not, i was just pointing out the obvious, and if the Soviets had in all seriousness decided to bomb parts of Pakistan (i.e. a soviet onslaught) their is nothing that would have stoped them from doing so.
Originally posted by PAF Fan
Not really Matt, according to DIA Pakistan has 3 times as many warheads then India and Shaheen II is based on a fully erector launcher, most independent estimates put Pakistans missile and nuke programme ahead of Indias, we dont need to worry about our nuke deterrent vis a vis India…
Did you read what i wrote? I have already conceded that Pakistan might be ahead on the nuke stakes visa vis India.
READ!
Its having enough trouble keeping ahead of India on the nuclear stakes..
dont tell me that spending the amount you spend, of your GDP on the Army and nukes, as you do, is an easy task and does not effect other Area’s such as Social work, and development.