The fool (excuse me) should have spoken out way before Iraq happened! whats the point in talking bout increasing responsibility with diminishing budget after the milk has be spilt the cat has been let out of the bad and the mouse has been caught..(oki so i made the last one up)..
But they need to reorganise some how i guess, the new AC is just one example..if companies cannot work on the bidding price they shouldnt win..
ooh well.. i hope the mod sorts something out..
is that a modification of a sunburn? the Chinese missile i mean..
I still like the way the Granite works.. abosolutely Evil.
I thought you guys, us, Australia and Russia already had EMP devices..
oki i concede.. i take back what i posted..cheers for the edumacation SOC.
lmao..
erm oki good point..but my counterpoint please humour me..
if the system is a critical system then wouldnt it have a back up generator of some sort?
Wouldnt the systems be hardened?
Does that mean that the Sunburn wouldnt work either? or any missile with Russian tech or involvment? Air to air or otherwise.
Originally posted by plawolf
u forget the part my post abt ‘its what u do with the weapons that matters’? i guess in ur mind, everyone who own’s a gun is a homicidal miniac just waiting to change to pop a cap in ur a$$.:rolleyes:
oh sorry my bad, i guess when people buy guns they do it to dig holes and plant trees and make the world a better place .. guns are never bought to kill anything, animals or humans..
D’oh maah bad.
Erm whats it mean by pop a cap? do they all become drug dealers and druggies instead of murderers?
The Reality is that China has been threatening action if a vote is passed and Taiwan declares Independence. For you to come here and tell me that China is really a peace loving country and is an angel, or to use a colloquialism “Whiter then white” like butter wouldnt melt its in its mouth etc etc, is plain crazy.
And please dont bring in the US having weapons.. This has nothing to do with the US being agressive or not, they are and they are not trying to show otherwise.
and I do not see any US citizen between our two postings saying how much of an angel america is etc etc.. like you are doing for China.
As too weather its one or two territories, i dont care, it doesnt effect me, my objection is about you posting about how China is soo peaceloving because it didnt nuke a country for sheltering hackers.
And if you want to argue that, then i could put on the tables, news about European hackers that got Key US defence details before a US campaign and tried to sell it or give it away…
heads up..or duck..:s
Republic of Korea Chooses Boeing SLAM-ER Missile
(Source: Boeing Co.; issued Mar. 11, 2004)
ST. LOUIS — The Boeing Company confirmed today the U.S. Navy, on behalf of the Republic of Korea Air Force, has finalized a $70 million foreign military sales order for Boeing Standoff Land Attack Missile – Expanded Response (SLAM-ER) missiles.
This is the tactical missile system’s first sale outside the U.S.
“Field experience tells us that SLAM-ER is one of the most operationally effective missiles in the U.S. inventory,” said John Lockard, Boeing senior vice president of Naval Systems. “We are pleased the Republic of Korea has selected our system, and that we can contribute to their air force’s capabilities.”
The Republic of Korea will deploy the SLAM-ER weapon system aboard its Boeing F-15K, the most capable multi-role fighter aircraft in the world. The procurement package includes missiles, logistics and training. The weapon, which Boeing produces for the U.S. Navy, utilizes Global Positioning System data and an infrared seeker with an advanced data link for precise attacks against targets on land or at sea from long ranges.
“SLAM-ER will give the Republic of Korea Air Force a highly accurate standoff land-attack weapon providing man-in-the-loop control for precise guidance to the desired aim point,” said Mike Marks, Boeing vice president and general manager for U.S. Air Force Fighter and Bomber Programs, and Weapons Programs. “SLAM-ER also provides the flexibility for use in anti-ship missions, with visual feedback ensuring targets are properly and positively identified prior to engagement.”
SLAM-ER achieved more than 90 percent success rate during development and operational flight tests. This includes all phases of development and integration on the F/A-18, P-3 and S-3.
Boeing has delivered more than 700 SLAM missiles and modified most of them into SLAM-ERs for the U.S. Navy. An affordable inventory upgrade, SLAM-ER incorporates a number of improvements to the baseline SLAM. These retrofit upgrades include planar wings to improve range and aerodynamic performance; an improved warhead to increase penetration and lethality against hardened targets; and software improvements making it easier for the control aircraft to select the precise hit-point on the target. The U.S. Navy took delivery of the first SLAM – a derivative of the Harpoon anti-ship missile – in 1988, and the first SLAM-ER in 1998. SLAM-ER achieved initial operating capability in the fleet in 2000.
Boeing has continued to evolve the weapon system. SLAM-ER recently demonstrated an important leap in capability – the ability to redirect the missile in flight to pop-up targets miles from the original mission. As a result, SLAM-ER is one of the leading platforms in network-centric operation capability.
“Our substantial investment in this weapon is a solid example of achieving effects-based transformation with today’s fielded platforms via network-centric operations,” Lockard said. “As a result, this already highly capable weapon is becoming increasingly more so.”
|snip|
defence aero..
hmm hot cakes..
Chocolate or fruit?
We should wait for Flood though wouldnt be proper..
Originally posted by plawolf
merely having weapons dont mean crap.
You dont run operation trident i hope. So i guess if some one walks up to you and points a gun in your face..its a act of peace right? coolies.. i love the world you live in.. 😀
Arthur you forget to stand well back mate..
Other possiblities could even be a change in the type of thread used its pitch etc. where they drill the holes..tolerances.. working out all the FRACA’s from the first prototype to make the second one a better engineered product.
cutting out corners that might effect fit etc etc..
then theirs the electronic side i am sure.. but i dont know anything bout electronics so.. i pass that on.
so basically even if they got intercepted they would have a high chance of firing of a missile with high likely hood of it nuking atleast a border town..
Shaheen 2 might have made your nukes less safe then ever if the report is true.
All you have done is proven to be more of a Liability in the eyes of the very peole you want to be safe against, giving them greater conviction to disarm Pakistan.
Iirc this is one test, how many shaheen 2’s are actually in service ??? How many are in production? I dont mean as possible use against India, because simply they would be Over kill.
But for Israel how many do you have? do they have multiple war heads?
If its 2 or 3 for now, do you think that would be enough to get past Arrow 2 and all the other Anti balistic missile missiles and lasers they have?
werent the Black jacks very fast then ? i dont follow, and why were they hard to kill?