dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SD-10/PL-12 #2675386
    matt
    Participant
    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2675407
    matt
    Participant

    Its only as strong as breadsticks? really? wow.. i thought it would be stronger.. see another reason why they would need consultants.

    in reply to: Feb16-2004: its official Su30K -vs- F15C #2675549
    matt
    Participant

    Is it possible for people to go see some of the exercise? I think i have some relatives i havent seen in a while 🙂 and would make a great first time plane spotting exercise .. 😀

    in reply to: Stealth design detection #2675615
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT
    in 1994 dassault equiped a Falcon with on board cancellation systems, they crossed UK and all europe, i heard it on radio, not a radar have detected them on the road they was waited to cross!

    they said to foreign authorities, they cacelled theirs flights !

    but theses flights was successfull!

    after they tested more , more flights in Rafale and Atlantic 2 planes!

    all this is classified, the Spectra is more that a standard AEW system!

    this shouldn’t be avaible for second market!

    how do you know if it was classified and please mind the language i apologise for it but WTF are you doing telling everyone on a internation forum!:confused:

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2675617
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by plawolf
    Matt:
    “It doesnt matter where the force effects, its how it effects the deck thats important, then you have to worry about dampners absorbers etc.”

    1) as crobato already pointed out, china has been studying many carrier designs for a long time, she even bought up most of the oldsoviet carrier fleet.

    “know how china does not have unless its operate a Aircraft carrier or has used consultants. Its not so simple.”

    2) ur getting confused in a loop. by ur logic, no-one can build sth unless they have done it before, but sth new has never been built by someone before, so therefore no-one can ever build anything new.

    carreirs have been in service for a long time, and all of the design criteria for a carreir has come out in some way or another by now, its only a matter of finding engineering solutions to those practical problems. while being able to build STs dont automaticlly give china the know-how to build carreris, it does however demonstrate a very high level of engineering ability and compitance. so overcoming all the engineering difficulties associated with designing and building a modern carrier hull is not out of reach of china’s shipbuilding ability.

    1) Reverse engineering will not teach you anything about the kind of forces you should expect from a super sonic or sub sonic missile, apart from this, you would imho need specialised FE software written specifically for the types of Impacts you would expect your ship to face. Its not as simple as welding together 2 inch thick steel plates. Withought any previous experience you would not be able to make any decent guesstimates about the Crew quarters which is also important, no point in having a 1000 crew ship where most of the crew are either p£ssed of or tired because some one said, well its only a AC how much different is that from an oil tanker. Things such noise would have to be taken into account, this ship will have to house a small town and it will need to keep them in a fighting state, this means considerations on noise dampners, sound proofing and ventilation in the crew compartments. Quick Exits and escape routes. Shape of galley, food storage area freezers etc. Sanitation equipment, toilets. strength of bulk heads, hinges and locking mechinism. This later bit i know you need experience in, even experience RN guys have to test new bulk heads to make sure they can with stand blasts and certain conditions.

    Then you have to think of how to place any amo housing, fuel walls, etc etc.

    Their is a marked difference in reading about something and being able to do it practically, and only experience can help you with the later part.

    2) I am not getting confused in anything, If you think you can build a AC of todays standards by going it alone you are blinded by nationalist fervour. You would need to consult.

    in reply to: Ur opinion on the World's most useless air force #2676198
    matt
    Participant

    Kuwait? I dont much trust their roll in all this, lol, they had a personall vandetta and they settled it.. lite blue touch paper and stand well back, as they say. but i was talking about UAE and Suadi Arabi, the two countries that are the most active in trying to show Brother hood, but dont actually do anything when needed.

    in reply to: Su-30MKi #2676201
    matt
    Participant

    U mean F/A-18E super.. against Su-30MKI’s?

    in reply to: Su30MKI v/s Rafale #2676202
    matt
    Participant

    India is working on ways to make civilian versions of GPS and GLONASS more acurate, but puting up 3 sats of its own to augment the three channel with a third. These sats would prob give the extra PSK signall and other information to the GPS system that military US gps’s usually use to be more acurate.

    in reply to: Stealth design detection #2676714
    matt
    Participant

    :confused:

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2676733
    matt
    Participant

    It doesnt matter where the force effects, its how it effects the deck thats important, theny you have to worry about dampners absorbers etc. know how china does not have unless its operate a Aircraft carrier or has used consultants. Its not so simple.

    just because u can manufacture cars does not mean u can make the enteprise.

    in reply to: Mars Landers… #2676767
    matt
    Participant

    Surrey, and Farnborough (DERA) were onces the centre of the UK maned spacecraft drive. Surey Uni it self has a great facilities for Sat research 🙁

    Mars attack rocks.

    and Yes USB is used by aliens,they supplied us the know how when they crashed in new mexico in the 40’s. now they sent a new standard for us. USB 2.

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2676820
    matt
    Participant

    AC = Aircraft Carrier.

    And if it does try to build it on its own without outside help or consultancy it will be useless, and probably of the same level as the 1960’s.

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2676840
    matt
    Participant

    It might be able to build a hull for a AC but i doubt it would be of any great quality of use unless they brought in outside help from people who already build Aircrafts. its not that simple.

    in reply to: Stealth design detection #2676849
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by aerospacetech
    2)Bistatic radar is not some universal panacea. It can allow detection of radar signals deflected by shaping, but the signal will still be attenuated by RAM/RAS. There are difficulties in creating the bistatic radar network, and it is not going to be that simple. How many countries have deployed bistatic radar systems? Oh, about none….

    1)Regarding IRST and RWR I was talking about detecting IR and radar emissions from the ENGINE and RADAR, obviously….

    1) Sorry i got my wires crossed i guess, your sentence sounded like you wanted to capture signals from IR sensors.

    2) I can repost my bit about RAM if you want.

    Most RAM is designed to Absorb a select range of Frequancies not the whole spectrum, thats why shaping is one of the other things used.

    And the British RADARS during WW2 were Bi static.

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2676865
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by plawolf
    “I dont think building large tankers is any assurance of capability
    to build large carriers ”

    so what would u say is the major difference between the design philosophies behind building a carrier and building a ST? what extra chararteristics do a carreir hull have that ST’s dont?

    Wait your saying that if a country can build tankers then it can build Aircraft carriers?

    …………………………….

    Interesting link..
    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/cv.htm

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,292 total)