dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Japan opts for U.S. BMD system #2684592
    matt
    Participant

    But would it be possible to get a high enough strike rate so that the US would not launch its nukes? will any government trust it enough?

    Oki, the only people with the (tried and tested and also known about) techonology (MIRV’s and decoy munitions) are the russians and they wont fire not now. But still you are putting a lot of faith in this system, so is the UK iirc (although its part in missile defence has been quite for some time)

    in reply to: Trishul fired for fifth time. #2684593
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by Wolverine
    care to explain? this is just testing. the more you do the better.

    Hmm, i am thinking it was a pun, or a joke. not to be taken seriously.

    in reply to: Japan opts for U.S. BMD system #2684695
    matt
    Participant

    Thanks SOC, I guess I could have googled for it, but i didnt know what name to search for in the first place. so thanks for reply.

    Some more info on Japan and UN.

    Date line: TOKYO
    Japan will next year upgrade the role of its troops’ UN peacekeeping missions overseas from a subordinate job to its main operation, a newspaper said Sunday.

    This is part of the government’s effort to provide a firm legal basis for dispatch of its Self-Defense Forces (SDF) to UN-led peacekeeping operations overseas, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun said.

    The planned upgrading of the SDF’s participation in such operations will be incorporated into the defence agency’s new platform to be adopted in August 2004, the newspaper said.

    ~~~
    My two penny’s
    More volunteers for the UN, not a bad thing at all, I hope China will one day start to take an Active part in UN policing, My personal belief that all permenant members should take a active role in peacekeeping or step down from permanant seat. Maybe Russia should start taking an active role also.

    in reply to: Fao Soc. #2684722
    matt
    Participant

    Is it any good? i loved it on the PC but have not got it on the XBOX, i did just buy Medal of Honour wasnt sure about it first, but it is such an excellent game.

    added much later 😮 They throw grenades back at you!

    matt
    Participant

    I keep thinking the EFA.

    in reply to: Fao Soc. #2684901
    matt
    Participant

    http://bestanimations.com/Military/Planes/Planes.html

    this is the place i found them from enjoy i guess. 🙂 i love the F-14’s

    in reply to: Fao Soc. #2684918
    matt
    Participant

    next one

    in reply to: Fao Soc. #2684922
    matt
    Participant

    lol thats pretty sweet..

    in reply to: Highly manoeverable aircraft – are they still needed? #2684926
    matt
    Participant

    RAF website has vids.

    in reply to: PAF Inducts H-4/H-2 AAMs #2684977
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by phrozenflame
    Guys dont get carried away…say its not BVR..(Soc is happy) its air-to-ground missile..thats raptor 2…120 km ..3 m CEP…does india has anything better than that?!

    Dunno about better

    but.

    “The Matra ARMAT was developed from the earlier Anglo-French AS 37/AJ.168 MARTEL (Missile Anti-Radar Television). Development of the ARMAT began in 1980; and was tested in 1982-84. The standard load is two for a Mirage 2000 and one for a Jaguar. The missile has a speed of Mach 0.9, with a minimum range of 15 km and a maximum range of 120 km. As an anti-radiation missile, the ARMAT has a cylindrical body with a pointed nose, four cropped-delta wings and four in-line cropped delta tail fins just astern of the main wings. Propulsion system is based on a solid fuel rocket. The anti-radar seeker has sufficient sensitivity to acquire the target radar before the radar acquires the host aircraft. It has a proximity fuze and a warhead weight of 160 kg.”

    Or what about this one ..

    KH-31A2/P2 [AS-17 KRYPTON]

    ——————————————————————————–

    Note: The Kh-31A2/P2 air-to-surface missiles are reportedly on order from Russia. The Kh-31A2 is the anti-ship variant and has a top speed of Mach 3+ and a range of 70 km. The Kh-31P2 is the anti-radar variant and has a top speed of Mach 3+ and a range of 200 km.

    Also

    u might like this one.

    http://www.brahmos.com/

    in reply to: Japan opts for U.S. BMD system #2684978
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by ageorge
    :confused: :confused: him dyslexic maybe what ? hey hey hey lol lol lol hey hey hey . Anybody clue he say what ,hey hey hey :confused:

    U oki there ageorge? too much Xmas spirit or what?

    Well anyways its good that Japan is taking a more pro active parts in the military world, they have been charitable like always but this is a major change in their out look on the world. and its good to see.

    Is the Antey the one with nuclear warheads? the one thats in place gaurding Moscow?

    in reply to: Trishul fired for fifth time. #2684981
    matt
    Participant

    hmm Xan i think they have already proven the anti sea skimming missile missile bit.

    in reply to: Japan opts for U.S. BMD system #2685009
    matt
    Participant

    US praises Japan on missile defense system

    19/12/2003 at 20:37:13

    Date line: WASHINGTON
    The United States Friday praised Japan’s decision to adopt a ballistic missile defense system, but sidestepped suggestions the move pointed to pessimism over North Korea crisis talks.

    Tokyo said it would adopt a US-developed system to protect itself from emerging threats from terrorists, weapons of mass destruction and North Korean missiles.

    “Without going into the motivations of the Japanese decision, let me say that we welcome the Japanese government’s decision to move forward on plans for missile defense,” said State Department deputy spokesman Adam Ereli.

    “I would note that the United States and Japan have cooperated on missile defense research for several years.

    “Its decision to acquire US missile defense systems is further evidence of the close and cooperative relations between our two countries.”

    Ereli declined to respond to suggestions that Japan’s move signified it was holding out little hope that efforts to defuse North Korea’s nuclear program would succeed.

    A new round of six-party talks on the program was due to have taken place in Beijing this week, but was delayed until next year, after Pyongyang and Washington failed to agree on the agenda for the talks.

    Japan said it would introduce a US-developed missile defense system for now and continue to conduct joint research with the United States to improve on it, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda said in a statement.

    Tokyo has been alarmed by repeated launches of missiles by North Korea into the Sea of Japan.

    North Korea fired a suspected ballistic missile over Japan and into the Pacific in 1998, prompting Tokyo to launch joint research with the United States to develop missile defense systems the following year.

    © 2003 AFP

    in reply to: Trishul fired for fifth time. #2685011
    matt
    Participant

    India tests anti-aircraft missile four times in three days

    20/12/2003 at 09:33:18

    Date line: BHUBANESWAR, India
    India tested its Trishul anti-aircraft missile Saturday for the fourth time in three days, a defence spokesman said.

    The Trishul (“Trident”) was fired from a mobile launcher at 13:00 pmat a moving airborne target from the testing range in Chandipur in the eastern state of Orissa, said the spokesman.

    The military also fired the Trishul on Thursday and twice Friday.

    The ongoing tests are meant to gauge the accuracy of the Trishul, which can deliver a 15-kilogram (33-pound) warhead up to nine kilometers (five miles) away, officials said.

    The missile has now been tested eight times.

    in reply to: Trishul fired for fifth time. #2685765
    matt
    Participant

    The two surface-to-air missiles – the quick-reaction radar-guided Trishul and the active homer Akash – were designed as conventional defences against aircraft, helicopters and remotely piloted vehicles (RPVs). Trishul, which in its three configurations was an air defence weapon of the Army, the Navy or the Air Force, represented a last round of defence. In the event of enemy aircraft eluding the long- and medium-range defensive covers, Trishul’s radar could pick up the incoming target and send a salvo of twin missiles on an interception path within seconds.

    Akash had a more ambitious role – the acquisition, at longer range, of multiple targets with a sophisticated “phased array” type of radar. Powered by an innovative Ramjet motor that uses the air in the atmosphere to burn the fuel, Akash is India’s answer to the Patriot missile defence against other missiles. (Patriot saw action during the 1991 Gulf war.) But the range of operations of these two surface-to-air missiles, which would typically be between 500 metres and 50 km, was again too low for anything except a conventional chemical explosive warhead.
    ~~~
    From link
    ~~~

    So did they test the Akash or the Trishul?

Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 3,292 total)