dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2376286
    matt
    Participant

    Logistics isn’t really that bad and definitely something that con uld be handled in MRPsystems available relatively cheaply of the shelf. Also the UK is probably the worst example to take for the IAF which has real existential threats. The UK military although does a lot of fighting and bombing it can choose, take it or leave it and do not have existential threats apart from economical ones.

    in reply to: Indian Space/Missile News/Discussion – III #1797147
    matt
    Participant

    What has happened to India’s anti armour missile?

    Did they or will they integrate the missile onto the Rustom H?

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2377386
    matt
    Participant

    Hi all lost a few pages on this thread what is so special about the 117 type 30 engine?

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #579265
    matt
    Participant

    Well the 1000 and 800 are having similar issues wither uncontained failures on A380 and 787. RR may need to think next move very carefully. Fix the large trents or work on single isle.

    Any news from Boeing? I know they just announced that they think India has a market for 1200 or so craft. But to be honest the gov had said it and started work on NCA

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2378261
    matt
    Participant

    IAF plans consortium of domestic companies for Rs.10,000 cr contract

    Indian Air Force officers may soon power aviation agencies

    Excellent news! Hope the engines are eastern European open rotor engines. Will give Indian firms exposure that will be usefully on the nca

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2000087
    matt
    Participant

    Delivery of the Indian Navy Missile (BRAHMOS) Frigates for which a contract was signed in 2006 will be delayed, delivery date unknown and cost over run of $100 million. Rosboronexport has been asked for this sum.

    Nerpa to be delivered to IN by year end.

    Russian companies will bid for Indian Navy’s next generation Submarine purchase estimated value $11 Billion. However going by the trend in delays and price increases I can not see how they can be percieved in good light.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #580489
    matt
    Participant

    I think they will need geared system for the open rotor to allow bigger fans spinning at lower speeds allowing them to have hollow rohacell or x-cor inners and reduce risk in case of a blade failure.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #580677
    matt
    Participant

    oopps going off subject with the engine talk…

    As for Boeing …

    What could it pull out of its hat technically in the next say 3-4 years that could rival the A320 NEO or CSeries.

    Answers on a postcard, better yet stick them below…

    I am thinking still that the Flying wing powered by an Open roto engine, maybe Boeing pushes P&W or GE to work with the D-27 engine makers?

    I know boeing probably need to do a lot less to beat the A320 NEO but i can dream of sitting in the flying wing whilst we still have enough oil to make flight affordable for normal people.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #580696
    matt
    Participant

    If they cannot recoup costs on 250+ airliners (500 engines) assuming 50% market…

    Then R-R definitely have the right approach, making things modular and having small iterations off the latest stepping in each area.

    Possibly but only if they do not have to exercise the governments golden share because they did not have a competitive enough engine for the single isle.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #580889
    matt
    Participant

    835 B787s on order.

    574 A350s on order.

    Both numbers are PRIOR to first delivery!!

    Not lucrative enough? :confused:

    may not be able to recoup costs who knows… they have engines for the single isle.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #580915
    matt
    Participant

    The other side of GE not being on the 350 is that the market may not be lucrative enough.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #581420
    matt
    Participant

    Engines seems to be your bag, so I wont probe anymore… However it now comes down to the next challange. They have an engine what aircraft do they prove it on?

    They will be competing against PW and GE & Snecma who are going to be on the Airbus, Superjet, Comac C919, Bombardier C-series. RR possibly only have Boeing and even then boeing will most likely get 50% market share on single isle maybe (its usually always been 50-50 or there abouts) and on top of that it has to compete with two other proven engines.

    With regards to Boeing itself, yes they have customers who are waiting but those customers will also be thinking about market share and competitiveness. If they find others undercutting them on similar routes in the coming future they may not be able to wait. The market may push those airlines towards more efficient/lighter aircraft.

    I do take the point onboard that single isle will most likely require higher thrust engines with light airframes as most of the time is spent landing and taking off as apposed to longer distance/range aircraft which spend larger proportion of time cruising.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #581427
    matt
    Participant

    Ooofft.

    That is probably stretching things just a bit too far…

    Lemme see.

    Trent XWB – A350

    Trent 1000 – 787

    Trent 900 – A380

    Trent 800 – 777

    Trent 700 – A330

    All post the V2500. While you could argue that the above are “just” derivatives of the RB211, that would be tenuous in the extreme!

    Indeed – you’ll struggle to find a recent new build LCA that doesn’t have Rolls-Royce options.

    I thought they were called or modified rb211 but I am not stating this as fact, also the way rb285 has been sidelines makes me wonder well firstly what was so wrong or old with it and secondly won’t they need a completely new design to challenge Cfm and pw.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #581460
    matt
    Participant

    Amiga a lot of them have gone alone, snecma is still tied to Cfm partners but the iae partnership is definitely gone. RR does not have many vehicles left to showcase its new engine. And if market blurb us correct they have not designed and made and engine on their own for 30 odd years. Last new engine was prob the v2500.

    in reply to: Predictions for Boeings Next Move #581646
    matt
    Participant

    Well thing is if Michael O’Leary is correct by backing COMAC with its CFM engine and COMAC do manage to beat Boeing in operation cost as well as price point then Ryan Air would go for COMAC as would a lot of other people.

    Also by the time Boeing come out with the new single isle aircraft the current engines would have probably proven their efficiencies and savings making it very hard for a new third engine to come back into the fray.. It would be a paper engine at that point in time.

    Scalled down 787 using same materials, smaller tooling… I can imagine the wing box etc could not be scalled down and cause a lot of headaches though..

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 3,292 total)