Originally Posted by JangBoGo
for both of you here are some data…
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gener…ts%20Inspected
here an earlier case with snags.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/dh…ts-mark/22400/
It looks like when one problem is sorted out another pops up? It looks like someone failed to take proper verification of the design before clearing the project? I don’t know what else can be attributed to such design failure of the rotors and the ribs.
Lots of things really, quality control, quality management, poor operator training, lack of understanding of manufacturing features effects on stress.
So how is my response to the question posed by JangBoGo a insinuation?
rayrubik i.e ,
Step I – Check matt’s question – (50 years?)
Step II – Confirm that my examples are the answers to matt’s question.
All those aircraft were relevant in the years that they were built or were operating in and point towards the experience of HAL.They do not have to be relevant to the Dhruv.
Therefore ,
Quote:
so in summary, the three examples you cited are not really applicable to specific case we are talking about here.
…that is just a totally out of context reply from you.
Quote:
but, even experience airframe manufactures experience these problems, the more experience you have the less problems, but still problems. HAL just need to learn.
..yep , just like every other aerospace manufacturer and/or everybody in this world.Learning is a never ending process.But that is totally different from misreading a situaton and making a rash conclusions/insinuations at HAL.Such problems happen with every other aircraft that is flying.No need to throw a hissy fit about it as some have done.Just makes those comments look stupid.
29th March 2011 20:32
Anyone who has some experience and not a tenious link would have given the same answer to JanBoGo’s question
I don’t know what else can be attributed to such design failure of the rotors and the ribs.
Sign In
