Research is unprofitable.
I have a issue with this statement not with yourself Witcha, this is the third or fourth time i have heard this and frankly this is not my opinion but a fact.. Those sentiments that you echo (i.e. they might not be your own) are the very reason why India will never be a developed country!
If it wants to be developed then people and industrialist need to start looking at things from a different perspective. i.e. think long term.
R&D is profitable but in the long term!
Example.
DRDO or the Indian MOD give company x (apologies will do materials based example)…
10million dollars for a public private partnership where the government covers covers 50% of the cost of the research and the stipulation is that the IP generated is owned by the company but benifits India only.
Company X embarks on this project and does not make any profit on it during the 5-10 years (normal gestation time for any lab – production based project)
Company X at the end of 10 years has generated IP, trained up its work force on a novel process and procedure
Copany X now embarks on another 50/50 work package of research with the governemtn
However in parrallel to this company X has now trained up a work force, set up the correct operating procedures and processes with which it is able to do bread and butter work and not only bid for contracts but develop its own products and market them for local defense contracts.
R&D is a tool that should be used in conjunction with bread and butter work… use the bread and butter to make the profit and use the R&D to learn the processes that will be the bread and butter of the future!
One thing is certain. The Chinese have closely studied and learned greatly from history, which encompasses Imperial Japan`s loss and failures, the United States military`s use and exploits of advance technology warfare!
They took in what the United States did and achieved in the Cold War (the importance of economic strength not being outstripped by arms expenditure and large sanding armies), Gulf War I & II, and the NATO`s military actions against Serbia (predominantly lead and initiated by U.S airpower). Nor would the Chinese forgotten the lessons of the Korean War! The Chinese remember and utilize the teachings of Sun Tzu, which would not simply conceive sending 20 Flankers against 20 Raptors! Never under estimate your enemy (or potential enemy! Regardless of your perceived strength and envisioned superiority!
By the way it should be noted – as per the teachings of The Art of War, one only needs to see the importance and effectiveness of the Chinese intelligence system, and just how effective it has been in penetrating the United States military and the United States Arms Industry.
This effectiveness really has the Pentagon worried!
It is the duty and job of the pentagon to be worried about anyone it thinks is trying to achieve parity in some form or another.
Sun Tzu is the corner stone and gives basic building blocks it is also a heritage text which although comes from China does not preclude other people from reading and building on it.
For all the points you list and for all the build up the PLAAF is going through they have still never had to use their power in anger yet. The USN and USAF has and that will also help.
I think it would have to be a very foolish person that underestimates US air power now or in 10 years, thats not to say that a war with the US can not be won.
Also I do not understand when the F-22 got cancelled and suddenly became obsolete… Even if it did does it really matter ? have to agree and second pjhydro!
There is new post about Russian Strategic Air Defense in his blog today.
what is his blog addy?
Who cares what it is based on, its the fact that its flying and that the PAF and Catic have enough faith in it to sell it to others that makes the big difference!
Simple equations for warfare i suppose are that quality > quantity unless Quantity xX > quality. where x is multiplication and X is the factor. The factor would depend on who was against whome. Support available etc etc..
Unfortunately for a lot of people the US has both and the support required also. Was it SOC ((?) and where is he these days anyone heard? is he ok?)) who said the the USN is still the largest airforce in Asia? Enough to make anyone think.
That gives you a hint.
Doesnt matter if the EFA etc catchup with the F-22 or not.. And yes china is making moves but no country can go 10% gdp year on year on year the supremacy is for the US to lose not for China or country x to gain.
Abhimanyu, do you have details of the difference between the LCA MK1 and MK2 and Naval LCA?
The wikipedia page and the final summary looks odd or incorrect…
Max speed of Mach 2+ being quoted does not make sense I thought the angle of the wings restricted it to mach 1.6.
I am excited to go to farnborough and go see the JF/17 looks like a good plane! 🙂
looks beautiful from the top looks different from the side..
cant believe the empty weight is 6400kgs..Shows what good design and rationalisation can do..
Does that mean you do not know either? I do not care about the aero differences I was asking about the manufacture and structure.
What is the difference between nlca and lca mk2
Hmm where did you see that when I looked for data most bits I saw said that gripe was around 6400-6600 nothing near 5800
Key players in usa want to stop c-17 induction into usaf
who says it is 800 kgs lighter ?
my mistake took the post previously as fact. should have checked hard to do so on mobile.. but no excuse really.
Just wondering if someone could tell me why the Gripen is 800Kg’s lighter than the LCA?
Temperature is kind of konstant all over the globe at 28000ft.
you would hope so otherwise we would be in big trouble!
Now consider that the gripen has a fair amount of composites in its structure. why is it 800Kg lighter?